poor quality of jobs in tourism

share this!

February 12, 2019

Poor employment in tourism threatens sustainability

by Laura Butler, University of Surrey

A new study in tourism employment finds that many jobs are failing to provide dignity in employment. The tourism sector, which accounts for nearly 10 per cent of global employment, risks undermining rather than contributing to the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals, according to three academics from the University of Surrey.

Anke Winchenbach, Dr. Paul Hanna and Professor Graham Miller have co-authored a paper, published today in the Journal of Sustainable Tourism, which reveals examples of where the tourism sector is failing to offer 'decent working practise' to employees, contributing to their sense of self-worth and overall performance.

Travel and tourism are viewed as drivers for economic growth and job creation, with employees and quality of work at the centre of the sustainable tourism debate, yet compared to professions such as nursing, there is limited research on the experiences of the tourism workforce.

Identifying dignity as a powerful concept for assessing workplace experiences, the authors have linked the concepts of dignity and identity to investigate how 'decent work' in tourism employment can be understood – and what can be done to make it a reality for more employees.

The paper illustrates how positive professional identities play a key role in the decision to remain working in the tourism sector and contribute to lasting careers at all hierarchical levels, and that ensuring dignified and decent work positively impacts on the bottom line of organisations and the economy at large, boosting staff retention and future recruitment engagement.

By drawing on case studies , the paper examines individual worker experiences and suggests that the tourism sector can fall short of offering dignified, meaningful working conditions. For tourism to address the increasing skills shortage, tourism workers need to feel recognised in both financial and non-financial terms.

When discussing how her research will benefit society Anke Winchenbach, teaching fellow and ESRC Ph.D. scholar in Sustainable Tourism, said: "Our research highlights where tourism employment practices verge on, or are indistinguishable from, exploitation. The sector needs to adapt and improve its treatment of all of its workforce, as the current model can see workers suffer, which in turn has a detrimental impact on customer experience and business success.

"A deeper understanding of, and engagement with the meaning and value of dignity in tourism employment is critical for policy makers as well, in order to motivate the creation of more supportive working environments within the tourism sector and enable the industry to become a rewarding employment opportunity, contributing to the wider global sustainability agenda."

Provided by University of Surrey

Explore further

Feedback to editors

How worms shaped Earth's biodiversity explosion

15 hours ago

Meet Neo Px: the super plant that attacks air pollution

A Chinese spacecraft lands on the moon's far side to collect rocks in growing space rivalry with US

Saturday Citations: The sound of music, sneaky birds, better training for LLMs. Plus: Diversity improves research

Jun 1, 2024

Study investigates a massive 'spider' pulsar

Greener, more effective termite control: Natural compound attracts wood eaters

Shear genius: Researchers find way to scale up wonder material, which could do wonders for the Earth

New vestiges of the first life on Earth discovered in Saudi Arabia

May 31, 2024

Mussels downstream of wastewater treatment plant contain radium, study reports

A new way to see viruses in action: Super-resolution microscopy provides a nano-scale look

Relevant physicsforums posts, is it possible to transform an electric storm into an emp storm, iceland warming up again - quakes swarming, mount ibu, indonesia erupts.

May 29, 2024

Adirondack Mountains and earthquakes

May 23, 2024

The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones

Mt. vesuvius 1944 eruption light show -- static electricity.

May 22, 2024

More from Earth Sciences

Related Stories

Australian tourism policies fail to address climate change

Nov 2, 2017

We're in the era of overtourism but there is a more sustainable way forward

Jan 16, 2019

The impact of tourism on the sustainability of an aging community in japan

Nov 12, 2018

Businesses think they're on top of carbon risk, but tourism destinations have barely a clue

Jan 8, 2019

Autonomous vehicles could shape the future of urban tourism

Nov 7, 2018

Research reveals secrets of success of tourism entrepreneurs

Jun 29, 2017

Recommended for you

'Forever chemical' discovery can aid drinking water treatment

No new fossil fuel projects needed in the transition to Net Zero, researchers say

Study of radioiodine sorption and transport could help protect groundwater

Reduced sulfur content in shipping fuel associated with increased maritime atmospheric warming

May 30, 2024

A local bright spot among melting glaciers: 2,000 km of Antarctic ice-covered coastline has been stable for 85 years

Let us know if there is a problem with our content.

Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).

Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.

Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.

E-mail the story

Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Newsletter sign up

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.

More information Privacy policy

Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience

We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.

E-mail newsletter

Working conditions – the dark side of tourism

Austria is renowned for its beautiful landscapes and high-quality tourist infrastructure. However, this is very much in contrast with the quality of work and employment in the tourism industry, which can be seen as the dark side of that favourable image. The sector suffers from low income levels, low wage satisfaction, unfavourable working times, very limited career opportunities, a high level of career breaks and significant use of over-qualified workers.

Introduction

Tourism is an important sector for Austria, not only for the country’s reputation but also for its economy. The sector, which includes hotels, restaurants and catering, is a major employer providing 5.4% of the country’s jobs and generating added value amounting to 4.4% of the gross domestic product (GDP).

But even though employees in the tourism industry often represent the official face of Austria to visitors and tourists from abroad, their working conditions often remain invisible. A recent study, Tourism in Austria 2011 (in German, 1.74Mb PDF) , commissioned by the Austrian trade union vida and the Vienna Chamber of Labour , sheds light on various aspects of the quality of work and employment in the sector.

Data sources for study

Analysing a broad range of quantitative data, the study draws a comprehensive picture of the tourism sector and the working conditions under which specific services are delivered. The study is based on the secondary analysis of various statistical datasets including social security data, data from the Austrian Court of Audit , the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the Work Climate Index . The database of the Work Climate Index consists of two cumulative samples of different survey waves to ensure representativeness for the sector. The first sample covers 506 respondents (from different waves, 1998–2001) and the second 798 respondents (2007–2010).

Characteristics of the sector’s workforce

A brief overview of the employment structures of the sector provides a first glimpse of how the tourism sector is structured. The sector is characterised by high proportions of female, migrant and low-skilled workers.

Different data sets confirm that about 60% of the sector’s jobs are done by women. There is also a concentration of migrant workers in the sector; social security data show that 36% of the workforce (compared with 13.8% in the overall economy) have foreign citizenship.

Low-skilled workers make up an important part of the workforce. Data from the Work Climate Index shows that their 25% share of jobs in the sector is well above the 13% across Austria’s total workforce. This is backed up by a 2009 analysis of notified vacancies, which shows that almost half of the jobs advertised in tourism (48.5%) did not require specific professional skills.

Low income levels

Tourism is one of the sectors in Austria with the lowest wage levels. In 2008, the median monthly income (gross salary) in tourism of €1,463 was about a third (32%) below the overall median monthly income of €2,154. This is the third lowest position of all sectors, with only private households and agriculture offering even lower wages. This could also be interpreted as a reflection of the high concentration of disadvantaged employee groups (female, migrant and low-skilled workers) in the sector. Within the sector, female workers achieve only 87% of the level of male workers’ wages. Although the gender pay gap is smaller than average, it is significant for the women concerned given the overall low wage level in the sector.

It is therefore not surprising that data from the Work Climate Index show very low wage satisfaction among employees in the tourism sector. Whereas an average 63% of employees in other sectors reported being ‘very satisfied’ or ‘relatively satisfied’ with their pay, this is true for only 50% of tourism workers (see figure). Moreover, 46% stated that their wage is just enough to make ends meet, and this was not even true for 15%. In addition, a quarter of respondents suspected that their wages would not be enough to earn them a pension on which they would be able to live.

Wage satisfaction of employees in and outside tourism

Source: Work Climate Index 2007–2010

Unfavourable working times

Work in hotels and restaurants is characterised by large deviations from standard working times. According to LFS data for 2009, 76% of workers work (at least sometimes) on Saturdays, 61% work on Sundays, 53% work in the evenings and 33% work during the night. A third of the workforce is affected by shift work.

Beyond these widespread unusual working time arrangements, another aspect of tourism has a major impact on working conditions in the sector. This is the practice of non-compliance with working time regulations (labour law). The study found that the proportion of violations of working time regulations detected by the labour inspectorate in tourism is much higher than the sector’s 5% share of the overall workforce, accounting for 51% of all violations in the field of ‘youth employment’ (primarily working time) and 22% of violations of general working time limits.

According to data from the Work Climate Index, the tourism sector features a very high proportion of part-time work (40%), which is not surprising as it is dominated by female workers (83%). Another specific feature is the high percentage of marginal employment contracts (‘mini jobs’), which amount to 18% of contracts compared with 8% in the overall economy, and they are predominantly given to female workers (69%).

Because wage levels are low in tourism, wages for part-time work in the sector are not enough to live on and, as the study points out, the prevalence of such work also reduces access to skilled jobs and management positions.

Very limited career opportunities

The study pays particular attention to the possibilities of occupational development and career opportunities. Seasonal variations in demand for employees create a major structural problem in the lack of continuous employment in large parts of the sector. In 2009, only 54% of tourism workers were employed throughout the whole year. A further 16% were employed for most of the year (75–94%), and 18% for a considerable part of the year (34–74%) (see table).

Source: Tourism in Austria 2009

This situation is amplified by the high percentage of career breaks in the sector, with 71% of the workforce having spent extended periods out of the sector – female workers to a greater extent (75%) than their male colleagues (63%). The average duration of such breaks amounts to 41 months, which is relatively high, with a significant gender difference (women 50 months, men 23 months) for childcare reasons.

The high percentage of low-skilled workers in the sector (61% of female and 42% of male workers) is another indicator of limited career opportunities. However, a special feature of work in tourism is also the high utilisation of people in jobs for which they are over-qualified. This is especially true for female workers; whereas about 75% of female employees in tourism have completed occupational training, only 39% are deployed in skilled positions. The same is true for migrant workers; 17% of migrant tourism workers who have passed the higher-secondary school leaving examination ( Matura ) work in unskilled jobs compared with only 2% of Austrian workers.

These structural aspects (including the fact that two-thirds of the workforce work for companies with fewer than 20 employees) offer unfavourable conditions for career development. The study also looked at the subjective satisfaction of tourism workers with career development and job prospects, which is significantly below that of workers outside the sector. Only 43% are ‘very satisfied’ or ‘relatively satisfied’ (compared with 56% in other sectors) and 24% are ‘not satisfied’ (16% in other sectors).The same is true with regard to possibilities for vocational training; 45% ‘very satisfied’ or ‘relatively satisfied’ in tourism compared with 61% in other sectors.

Based on data from the Work Climate Index, the study reveals that this situation leads to a greater tendency among workers in tourism to seek exit strategies. Asked about their future work perspectives, about a third of the workforce reported wanting to change company or sector, compared with only 16% in other sectors.

Based on quantitative data on different aspects of the work environment, the study highlights the poor quality of work and employment in tourism, especially with regard to low wage levels, unfavourable working times and very limited career opportunities. This leads to a high turnover of labour and to many instances of using skilled workers to fill low-skilled jobs, a problem which is partly solved by using seasonal migrant workers who are more willing to accept these conditions.

To improve the situation, the study mentions the development of continuous employment models ( Ganzjahresbeschäftigungsmodelle ), regional employer pools (to improve access to vocational training even for workers in small companies) and childcare facilities with adequate opening hours.

Manfred Krenn, FORBA

Share this page

Tell us what you think.

When freely submitting your request, you are consenting Eurofound in handling your personal data to reply to you. Your request will be handled in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. More information, please read the Data Protection Notice .

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, perceptions of job quality in the tourism industry: the views of recent graduates of a university's tourism management programme.

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

ISSN : 0959-6119

Article publication date: 10 July 2009

The purpose of this paper is to explore how recent graduates of a university's tourism management programme in New Zealand perceive job quality in the tourism industry.

Design/methodology/approach

Semi‐structured interviews are used to examine graduates' assessments of the quality of their current jobs. These assessments are informed by their personal expectations and experiences. Understanding job quality requires an approach that takes into account both economic and non‐economic variables.

The interviews indicate the importance of job content and its compatibility with interests and preferences. Graduates associate job quality with opportunities to consume tourism products, assist tourists, acquire valued knowledge, confront challenges, and perform meaningful work. The quality of a job is influenced by the types of tasks graduates are required to undertake. However, graduates also consider a job's ability to provide access to a better job in the future.

Research limitations/implications

Although graduates were able to share their views in an in‐depth fashion through the interviews, the size of the sample prevents the author from determining whether the interviews uncover sweeping trends or the experiences of only a small group of individuals.

Originality/value

The study incorporates the voices of university graduates into the study of job quality in the tourism industry. An important determinant of job quality revealed through this research is the extent to which graduates receive intrinsic rewards from their jobs. Even though the findings of the study diverge from the view that jobs in the tourism industry are mainly of poor quality, a number of graduates would still prefer to see some improvement in the quality of their jobs.

• New Zealand

Weaver, A. (2009), "Perceptions of job quality in the tourism industry: The views of recent graduates of a university's tourism management programme", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110910967818

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

UN Tourism | Bringing the world closer

• All Regions
• Measuring Employment in the Tourism Industries – Guide with Best Practices

This guide provides some examples of best practices of measuring employment in the tourism industries from countries that have demonstrated capacity to develop a comprehensive set of employment indicators.

This publication is a joint project by the International Labour Organization ( ILO ) and UNWTO.

ISBN : 978-92-844-1615-8

share this content

• Share this article on facebook
• Share this article on twitter
• Share this article on linkedin

Related Content

Un tourism news 84: focus on boosting tourism performan..., un tourism news 83: un tourism´s impact: driving invest..., am news | vol. 64 may 2024, africa news issue 23.

Tourism: Job Creation, Entrepreneurship, and Quality of Life

• First Online: 07 October 2017

Cite this chapter

• Scott Hipsher 2  

758 Accesses

3 Citations

While there are some criticisms about the impact of tourism on quality of life for local residents, evidence shows tourism normally creates livelihood opportunities and economic growth. Many of the jobs created in the tourism industry do not require high levels of training or education, making the sector especially effective in combatting poverty. Tourism also creates many opportunities for microentrepreneurship and as the barriers to entry for most of these small businesses are low, tourism can provide opportunities for individuals to escape poverty by creating their own employment. Interviews with employees and microentrepreneurs throughout SEA were presented. Employees generally felt the jobs they chose to take were better options than their other livelihood opportunities and did not feel exploited by their employers and many workers had plans for the future. The microentrepreneurs also felt their choice of occupation was their best option, and often the personal freedom and flexibility of owning one’s own business were as important to the entrepreneurs as were the financial rewards. In general, the individuals interviewed shared in the opinion tourism was good for the country as well as for themselves as it provided additional choices of how to make a living. Also, an exploration of the intangible benefits tourists seek and often obtain was made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Almeida-García, F., Pelaez-Fernandez, M. A., Balbuena-Vazquez, A., & Cortes-Macias, R. (2016). Residents’ perceptions of tourism development in Benalmadena (Spain). Tourism Management, 54 , 259–274.

Article   Google Scholar  

Ashworth, G. (2015). Ethnic conflict: Is heritage tourism part of the solution or part of the problem? In Y. Resinger (Ed.), Transformational tourism: Host perspectives (pp. 167–179). Oxfordshire: Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI).

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Asian Development Bank. (2012). Greater Mekong subregion: Tourism sector assessment, strategy and road map . Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank.

Google Scholar  

Boonzaaier, C. (2009). The applicability of government policy to community-based catering services: The Hananwa of Blouberg, Limpopo Province. In P. Hottola (Ed.), Tourism strategies and local responses in Southern Africa (pp. 72–89). Oxfordshire: CABI.

Breda, Z., & Costa, C. (2013). Tourism development, conflicts and sustainability: The case of Goa. In C. A. Tisdell (Ed.), Handbook of tourism economics: Analysis, new applications and case studies (pp. 683–704). Singapore: World Scientific.

Chase, L. C., Amsden, B., & Phillips, R. G. (2012). Stakeholder engagement in tourism planning and development. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 475–490). Dordrecht: Springer.

Childers, J. M. (1932). From Siam to Suez . New York: D. Appleton & Company.

Genç, R. (2012). Tourist consumption behavior and quality-of-life. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 135–148). Dordrecht: Springer.

Harrison, D., & Prasad, B. (2013). The contribution of tourism to the development of Fiji and other pacific island nations. In C. A. Tisdell (Ed.), Handbook of tourism economics: Analysis, new applications and case studies (pp. 741–761). Singapore: World Scientific.

Hingtgen, N., Kline, C., Fernandes, K., & Gard-McGehee, N. (2015). Cuba in transition: Tourism industry perceptions of entrepreneurial change. Tourism Management, 50 , 184–193.

Hipsher, S. (2010). Theoretical view on microenterprise entrepreneurial motivators. In J. Munoz (Ed.), Contemporary micro-enterprise: Concepts and cases (pp. 49–60). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Inchausti-Sintes, F. (2015). Tourism: Economic growth, employment and Dutch disease. Annals of Tourism Research, 54 , 172–189.

Iyer, P. (1989). Video nights in Kathmandu: And other reports from the not-so-far-East . New York: Vintage Departures.

Jänis, J. (2009). Tourism development strategies in Namibia: Private and community perceptions on the national policy. In P. Hottola (Ed.), Tourism strategies and local responses in Southern Africa (pp. 8–26). Oxfordshire: CABI.

Kalantaridis, C., & Labrianidis, L. (2004). Rural entrepreneurs in Russia and the Ukraine: Origins, motivations, and institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (3), 659–681.

Keobountham, S. (2011). New economic mechanisms and livelihood diversification in the suburban area of Vientiane Lao PDR. In C. Vaddhanaphuti & C. Wittayapakm (Eds.), Revisiting agrarian transformations in the Greater Mekong sub-region: New challenges (pp. 71–88). Chiang Mai: Regional Center for Social Science & Sustainable Development.

Kristiansen, S. (2002). Individual perception of business contexts: The case of small scale entrepreneurs in Tanzania. Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, 7 (3), 283–304.

Kruger, P. S. (2012). Perceptions of tourism impacts and satisfaction with particular life domains. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 279–292). Dordrecht: Springer.

Li, S., & Gaur, A. (2014). Financial giants and moral pygmies? Multinational corporations and human rights in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 9 (1), 11–32.

Li, Y., & Li, X. (2012). Ethnic tourism and resident quality-of-life. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 373–387). Dordrecht: Springer.

Liburd, J. L., Benckendorff, P., & Carlsen, J. (2012). Tourism and quality-of-life: How does tourism measure up? In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 105–132). Dordrecht: Springer.

MacGregor, J. (1896). Through the buffer state: A record of recent travels through Borneo, Siam, and Cambodia . London: F.V. White & Co.

Mbaiwa, J. E. (2009). Tourism development, rural livelihoods and biodiversity conservation in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. In P. Hottola (Ed.), Tourism strategies and local responses in Southern Africa (pp. 90–104). Oxfordshire: CABI.

McKercher, B., & Ho, P. (2012). Cultural tourism and the enhancement of quality-of-life. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 341–358). Dordrecht: Springer.

Mihalic, T. (2013). Economic impacts of tourism, particularly its potential contribution to economic development. In C. A. Tisdell (Ed.), Handbook of tourism economics: Analysis, new applications and case studies (pp. 645–682). Singapore: World Scientific.

Nguyen, P. L. (2011). Relationship between the state and the peasant: Everyday politics in a traditional craft village in Northern Vietnam. In C. Vaddhanaphuti & C. Wittayapakm (Eds.), Revisiting agrarian transformations in the Greater Mekong sub-region: New challenges (pp. 116–159). Chiang Mai: Regional Center for Social Science & Sustainable Development.

Pitamber, S. (2000). Accessing financial resources and entrepreneurial motivations amongst the female informal sector micro-entrepreneurs in Sudan. Ahfad Journal, 17 (1), 4–21.

Potts, R. (2003). Vagadonding . New York: Villard.

Puczkó, L., & Smith, M. (2012). An analysis of tourism QOL domains from the demand side. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 264–277). Dordrecht: Springer.

Reisinger, Y. (2015). Reflections on life purpose. In Y. Resinger (Ed.), Transformational tourism: Host perspectives (pp. 3–5). Oxfordshire: CABI.

Rempel, J. M. (2012). Exploring the causal nexus of tourism impacts on quality-of-life. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 583–606). Dordrecht: Springer.

Singh, S. (2015). Where is the host? An analytic autoethnographic inquiry in transformational tourism. In Y. Resinger (Ed.), Transformational tourism: Host perspectives (pp. 47–66). Oxfordshire: CABI.

Tran, T. (2011). Household livelihood diversification as the result of a modernizing development project: A case study of modernizing development project: A case study of Can Tho bridge in Vinh Long Province. In C. Vaddhanaphuti & C. Wittayapakm (Eds.), Revisiting agrarian transformations in the Greater Mekong sub-region: New challenges (pp. 40–70). Chiang Mai: Regional Center for Social Science & Sustainable Development.

Truong, V. D., Hall, C. M., & Garry, T. (2014). Tourism and poverty alleviation: Perceptions and experiences of poor people in Sapa, Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22 (7), 1071–1089.

Uysal, M., Woo, E., & Singal, M. (2012). The tourist area life cycle (TALC) and its effect on the quality-of-life (QOL) of destination community. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 423–443). Dordrecht: Springer.

Vandenberg, P. (2006). Poverty reduction through small enterprises: Emerging consensus, unresolved issues and ILO activities (SEED working paper no. 75). Geneva: International Labour Organization.

Vanegas, M. (2012). Poverty elimination through tourism dynamics. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 65–83). Dordrecht: Springer.

Williams, D. R., & McIntyre, N. (2012). Place affinities, lifestyle mobilities, and quality-of-life. In M. Uysal, R. R. Perdue, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research: Enhancing the lives of tourists and residents of host communities (pp. 209–231). Dordrecht: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Webster University Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand

Scott Hipsher

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Hipsher, S. (2017). Tourism: Job Creation, Entrepreneurship, and Quality of Life. In: Poverty Reduction, the Private Sector, and Tourism in Mainland Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5948-3_11

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5948-3_11

Published : 07 October 2017

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-10-5947-6

Online ISBN : 978-981-10-5948-3

eBook Packages : Economics and Finance Economics and Finance (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Follow us on Facebook
• Follow us on Twitter
• Criminal Justice
• Environment
• Politics & Government
• Race & Gender

Expert Commentary

Is tourism a low-income industry? Evidence from three coastal regions

2011 study by Clemson and Michigan State University on how revenue generated by tourism is distributed across different income groups.

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .

by Katie Gleason, The Journalist's Resource June 20, 2012

This <a target="_blank" href="https://journalistsresource.org/economics/tourism-industry-wages-u-s/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://journalistsresource.org">The Journalist's Resource</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cropped-jr-favicon-150x150.png" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

Tourism is often promoted as an effective economic development strategy by regional planners and politicians in the United States. Among the potential benefits cited are job creation and tourism’s ability to create a positive public image for a region. Critics argue that tourism is not a panacea, but instead creates jobs that are low paying, offer few benefits, and are only part-time or seasonal work.

A 2011 study in the Journal of Travel Research , “Is Tourism a Low-Income Industry? Evidence from Three Coastal Regions,” analyzed how income generated by tourism is distributed across different income groups.  The researchers, based at Clemson and Michigan State University, used survey data of visitors and labor statistics from the tourism-dependent South Carolina areas of Myrtle Beach, Charleston and Beaufort-Hilton Head Island for their analysis.

The study’s findings include:

• Income from employment in the tourist industry was distributed primarily to those in lower-income brackets.
• Comparing the “income distribution from tourism-generated jobs to the overall distribution of income suggests that tourism provided more jobs with low wages than the overall economy of the regions.”
• In Charleston and Myrtle Beach, half of the jobs in the tourism industry provided annual incomes of less than $20,000.

The authors note that the study’s assumption of full-time employment likely causes it to overestimate the earnings of tourism workers. The researchers further cautions against extrapolating results to tourism in developing countries, where employment in the sector “may actually require relatively high levels of education and be high paying.”

Tags: tourism

About The Author

Katie Gleason

These are the top 10 countries for travel and tourism

The US retains its prime position in the World Economic Forum's latest Travel & Tourism Development Index. Image:  Unsplash/EveLazco

.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo{-webkit-transition:all 0.15s ease-out;transition:all 0.15s ease-out;cursor:pointer;-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;outline:none;color:inherit;}.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo:hover,.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo[data-hover]{-webkit-text-decoration:underline;text-decoration:underline;}.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo:focus,.chakra .wef-1c7l3mo[data-focus]{box-shadow:0 0 0 3px rgba(168,203,251,0.5);} Charlotte Edmond

.chakra .wef-1nk5u5d{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;color:#2846F8;font-size:1.25rem;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-1nk5u5d{font-size:1.125rem;}} Get involved .chakra .wef-9dduvl{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-size:1.25rem;}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-9dduvl{font-size:1.125rem;}} with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale

• Pent-up demand after the pandemic is expected to drive passenger numbers back up to pre-pandemic levels in 2024.
• The recovery of the travel and tourism sector since the pandemic has been uneven, however, and some nations are better placed than others to respond to the challenges and opportunities of the future.
• The top three best-placed countries for travel and tourism are the US, Spain and Japan, according to the World Economic Forum’s Travel & Tourism Development Index.

If you were desperate to get away after the restrictions and enforced staying at home of the pandemic years, you were far from alone.

Global international tourist arrivals are expected to meet pre-pandemic levels in 2024 driven by this pent-up demand. But, the recovery of the travel and tourism sector since the pandemic has not been without challenges. Add to that macroeconomic, geopolitical and environmental factors, which have added pressures on the industry.

These pressures will amplify and evolve over the coming years and, along with the growth of digital technologies and AI, may well force the travel industry to adapt.

Some economies are better placed than others to make these changes, respond to future risks and ensure that travel and tourism is a driver of economic growth and prosperity.

With this in mind, the World Economic Forum’s Travel & Tourism Development Index (TTDI) aims to serve as a benchmark for stakeholders to gauge progress, inform decisions and policies, and encourage sustainable and resilient growth.

A mixed recovery in challenging conditions

Europe dominates the top 10 economies for T&T, as ranked by the 2023 index, although the top spot is clinched by the US.

But the index also shows that while 71 of the 119 economies it ranks improved their scores between 2019 and 2023, the average improvement is just 0.7% above pre-pandemic levels.

On the one hand, the rebound in travel and tourism has coincided with rising global air route capacity and connectivity, improved international openness, and increased investment in natural and cultural resources driving tourism. On the other hand, non-leisure demand is still lagging, there are ongoing labour shortages, and air route capacity and connectivity, capital investment and productivity have struggled to keep pace with demand.

This has created a supply and demand imbalance which, along with inflationary pressures, has led to reduced price competitiveness and service disruptions.

Europe and Asia-Pacific have the most favourable conditions

Of the top 30 TTDI scorers in 2023, 26 are high-income countries. Nineteen of them are based in Europe, and seven in Asia Pacific.

These countries benefit from favourable business environments and labour markets, open travel policies, advanced technology adoption, excellent transport and tourism infrastructure, and rich natural, cultural and non-leisure attractions.

As a result, this group of 30 accounted for more than three-quarters of T&T industry GDP in 2022, and 70% of GDP growth between 2020 and 2022.

But although this group is leading the way, many of the above-average improvements in scores come from low- to upper-middle-income countries, including sub-Saharan and North Africa, Eurasia, South America, South Asia, and the Balkans and Eastern Europe.

While many have shown improvements, these less affluent countries still make up the vast majority of below-average scorers in the index. More investment is needed to help increase their share of the market and improve their readiness for future risks and opportunities.

Progress needed on resilience and equality

The ability of the travel and tourism sector to grow is limited by challenges like tight labour markets, growing fiscal constraints and concerns around health and security conditions. Labour market resilience will be an increasingly important factor for the sector, but issues like equality of job opportunities, workers’ rights and social protection are holding many economies – particularly low- and middle-income ones – back in this area.

As other sectors proceed to decarbonize, the aviation sector could account for a much higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century than its 2%-3% share today.

Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) can reduce the life-cycle carbon footprint of aviation fuel by up to 80%, but they currently make up less than 0.1% of total aviation fuel consumption. Enabling a shift from fossil fuels to SAFs will require a significant increase in production, which is a costly investment.

The Forum’s Clean Skies for Tomorrow (CST) Coalition is a global initiative driving the transition to sustainable aviation fuels as part of the aviation industry’s ambitious efforts to achieve carbon-neutral flying.

The coalition brings together government leaders, climate experts and CEOs from aviation, energy, finance and other sectors who agree on the urgent need to help the aviation industry reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

The coalition aims to advance the commercial scale of viable production of sustainable low-carbon aviation fuels (bio and synthetic) for broad adoption in the industry by 2030. Initiatives include a mechanism for aggregating demand for carbon-neutral flying, a co-investment vehicle and geographically specific value-chain industry blueprints.

Learn more about the Clean Skies for Tomorrow Coalition's impact and contact us to find out how you can get involved.

Another major hurdle for the sector is balancing growth with sustainability. Although there has been broad progress in areas like energy sustainability, some progress – like the fall in emissions seen during the pandemic – is likely to only be temporary.

Have you read?

What is overtourism and how can we overcome it , rising global temperatures are already affecting the tourism industry - here's how, don't miss any update on this topic.

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

The Agenda .chakra .wef-n7bacu{margin-top:16px;margin-bottom:16px;line-height:1.388;font-weight:400;} Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

.chakra .wef-1dtnjt5{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;} More on Energy Transition .chakra .wef-17xejub{-webkit-flex:1;-ms-flex:1;flex:1;justify-self:stretch;-webkit-align-self:stretch;-ms-flex-item-align:stretch;align-self:stretch;} .chakra .wef-nr1rr4{display:-webkit-inline-box;display:-webkit-inline-flex;display:-ms-inline-flexbox;display:inline-flex;white-space:normal;vertical-align:middle;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:0.75rem;border-radius:0.25rem;font-weight:700;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;line-height:1.2;-webkit-letter-spacing:1.25px;-moz-letter-spacing:1.25px;-ms-letter-spacing:1.25px;letter-spacing:1.25px;background:none;padding:0px;color:#B3B3B3;-webkit-box-decoration-break:clone;box-decoration-break:clone;-webkit-box-decoration-break:clone;}@media screen and (min-width:37.5rem){.chakra .wef-nr1rr4{font-size:0.875rem;}}@media screen and (min-width:56.5rem){.chakra .wef-nr1rr4{font-size:1rem;}} See all

The small island states making big strides towards 100% renewable energy

Michelle DeFreese

May 31, 2024

What is energy literacy and why is it important? Malaysia’s programme sees the potential

Olivia Zeydler

May 29, 2024

How solar thermal trapping paves way for sustainable metal smelting

Paige Bennett

May 27, 2024

'Every fraction of a degree matters': Why climate action needs a new narrative

How India is emerging as an advanced energy superpower 

Maciej Kolaczkowski, Debmalya Sen and Jeremy Williams

How MENA’s biggest actors can help the region’s suppliers and SMEs to decarbonize

Akram Alami and Kelsey Goodman

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Comparing working conditions and job satisfaction in hospitality workers across Europe

Rosalía díaz-carrión.

b Universidad de Sevilla, Spain

Virginia Navajas-Romero

a Universidad de Córdoba, Spain

José Carlos Casas-Rosal

c Universidad de Córdoba, Spain

• • The study explores the influence of the institutional context on job satisfaction.
• • The research develops a multilevel analysis that considers institutional and organizational factors.
• • Data of 22792 employees of 16 European countries from the Sixth European Working Conditions Survey are part of the sample.
• • A novel classification of countries according to their working conditions is provided.

Job satisfaction is important in the tourism sector since workers’ satisfaction is key to providing high-quality service, which is very important in determining organizational success. The working conditions that influence job satisfaction depend to a large extent on the institutional context, which shows similarities in some European countries. This research aims to compare working conditions and job satisfaction among European country blocks that have similar institutional characteristics. Unlike previous studies, this research adopts a comprehensive approach by considering institutional and organizational factors in the analysis of employees’ perceptions of job satisfaction. The sample is made up of 1633 workers in 16 European countries. The results demonstrate the existence of three different models of working conditions in Europe leading to differing levels of job satisfaction in tourism. These models do not correspond to the clusters identified by the previous literature, which adopts an institutional perspective.

1. Introduction

Satisfaction at work is one of the most studied topics in the management literature ( Dixit and Dean, 2018 ; Jung and Takeuchi, 2018 ; Lee and Chelladurai, 2018 ). Job satisfaction not only affects the productivity and performance of workers, it also influences how a company’s goals are achieved in terms of improving customer satisfaction, perceived service quality, customer loyalty and satisfaction, and brand image ( O’Donoghue and Tsui, 2013 ). This is especially relevant in the service industry since an adequate quality of service involves employee attitudes and behaviors that affect customers’ experiences and expectations ( Oliver, 1980 ). Our research focuses on the tourism sector due to the strong position this sector has in the European economy. According to the United Nations World Tourism Organization, the tourism sector comprises the third largest economic activity in the European Union (EU), accounting for about 10 % of its gross domestic product and ranking as the fourth sector in terms of exports. Tourism also contributes employment in the EU equivalent to 9.7 % of total employment ( World Tourism Organization, 2018 ). Despite its importance for the European economy, the tourism sector is characterized by underpaid jobs and high work-related stress ( Jovanović et al., 2019 ; Lillo-Bañuls et al., 2018 ). This is due to the characteristics of jobs in this sector, where limited career opportunities and broad work schedules exist ( Hofmann and Stokburger-Sauer, 2017 ; Stamolampros et al., 2019 ).

Job satisfaction is the result of different factors, among which working conditions play an important role. As shown in the literature, working conditions such as salary, promotional possibilities, job security, and the working climate highly affect job satisfaction ( Dalkrani and Dimitriadis, 2018 ). At the same time, working conditions are determined by different factors, among which the institutional context becomes especially relevant ( Boon et al., 2009 ). The literature defines the institutional environment as the set of directives, rules, laws, norms, and legal standards that determine the normative structure for economic and social development ( Acemoglu and Johnson, 2005 ; DiMaggio and Powell, 1983 ; Scott, 1987 ). The institutional context is determined by different factors such as economic conditions, unemployment rate, the national level of income inequality, and the degree of unionization ( Pichler and Wallace, 2008 ). However, the influence that the institutional context has on working conditions among countries classified as similar in terms of their institutional setting can be heterogeneous because, although the institutional context establishes the framework in which working conditions are developed, these conditions highly depend on employment practices implemented by organizations.

Job satisfaction is a concept that has been measured both nationally and internationally ( Lee and Chelladurai, 2018 ) in different sectors such as in banking and the public or hospitality sector ( Ariza-Montes et al., 2018 ; Kong et al., 2018 ). Most of these studies were conducted without taking into account the institutional context. Economic conditions, unemployment rate, and national level of inequality of a national territory, among other institutional factors, generate similar working conditions among countries in terms of salaries, working hours, job security, and flexibility ( Posada-Kubissa, 2018 ; Tangian, 2008 ). Working conditions are particularly context‐sensitive due to their strong linkage to the industrial relations system of a country, unemployment rate, etc. ( Van Dierendonck et al., 2016 ).

Despite the existence of a supranational government in the EU, the institutional context differs across countries, and therefore working conditions and employee satisfaction are also different across Europe. Previous studies have classified countries according to their institutional context and identify different models of human resource management in Europe (e.g., Brewster and Tregaskis, 2003 ; Ignjatović and Svetlik, 2003 ; Nikandrou et al., 2005 ). It is interesting to complement these studies that present an institutional focus with a perspective centered on organizational practices and employees´ perceptions. For employment practices to create value for companies and society, they must generate job satisfaction. Due to the importance of job satisfaction at individual, organizational, and societal levels, including employees´ perception of their job satisfaction, the analysis becomes crucial. A deep understanding of the differences in job satisfaction across Europe could set the basis for a deeper discussion and formulation of novel hypotheses regarding the influence of institutional factors on working conditions. This understanding could lead companies and policy-makers to propose policies for improving working conditions in order to enhance job satisfaction and social welfare.

Although some studies that compare job satisfaction across European countries can be found in the literature (e.g., Eskildsen et al., 2004 ; Millán et al., 2013 ; Pichler and Wallace, 2008 ), comparisons are made across national territories without considering the homogeneity that may exist among European countries. According to the literature, these countries can be grouped by blocks according to the similarities in their approach to the welfare state—which impacts, among its main facets, working conditions. The welfare state model of each country is determined, among other aspects, by public policies, labor regulation, and organizational practices—fundamentally, human resources management practices. Hence, the literature establishes blocks of countries based on their similarities in their institutional setting and their prevailing organizational human resources management models (e.g., Albareda et al., 2007 ; Brookes and Barfoot, 2005 ; Filella, 1991 ; Ronen and Shenkar, 1985 ; Tangian, 2008 ). The underlying premise is that there is some convergence toward homogeneity of these characteristics of countries within the same cluster and differences with respect to the rest of the blocks. Studies that analyze whether this convergence leads to homogeneity in workers´ perception of labor conditions and job satisfaction across Europe are rare.

This study tries to contribute to this end by exploring working condition models in Europe from an organizational perspective and considering workers´ perceptions. This might allow identification of possible deviations between the institutionally established regulations at the national or supranational level and the patterns of interaction of the workers and organizations in the labor market. This can help us understand which models lead to higher levels of job satisfaction and whether there is convergence in this aspect in the European context. The research seeks: (i) to analyze the different models of working conditions—what likely leads to differences in perceived job satisfaction—that exist in Europe; and (ii) to explore whether these models differ among the clusters of countries based on institutional characteristics identified in the previous literature. From these objectives, the following research question is derived: Does the clustering of European countries according to institutional characteristics correctly reflect the differences in labor conditions and subsequently job satisfaction across Europe ?

This article is divided into six sections. First, a review of the relevant literature is presented in the second section. Next, the methodology of the research and the results are explained in the third and fourth sections. Finally, a discussion of the results and the conclusions, which includes the limitations and suggestions for future research, are detailed in the fifth and sixth sections.

2. Literature review

2.1. job satisfaction and working conditions in the tourism sector.

Job satisfaction is an essential aspect for firms to gain a competitive advantage in all sectors, given the central role that employees play in business success ( Kramar, 2014 ). However, despite the importance of job satisfaction, there is no general agreement regarding its definition. Different authors have contributed to its clarification. Among the most-cited definitions is the one given by Spector (1997) , who emphasizes that job satisfaction refers to the way employees feel about their job and depends on different factors. Mahdieh and Sotoudehnama (2018) affirm that job satisfaction depends on factors such as personal, organizational, managerial, academic, professional, and economic variables. Goetz et al. (2016) underline four factors as determinants of job satisfaction: professional development, interpersonal relations, economic expectations, and working conditions.

There are principally two methodologies for assessing job satisfaction: the integral measurement of a single factor and the comprehensive multidimensional measurement. The difference between the two methods lies in the fact that while the former relies on a single item to measure job satisfaction, the latter employs several factors. Most research on job satisfaction at the national level adopts a multidimensional measurement approach. For instance, the descriptive work index (JDI) developed by Locke et al. (1964) includes different dimensions of the job such as promotion, payment, and relationships with managers and colleagues. Spector (1997) created a Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) that contains nine dimensions: salary, promotions, additional benefits, incentives, superiors, colleagues, operating environment, intrinsic work characteristics, and communication. Parent-Thirion et al. (2016) developed their Job Quality Index (JQI) from seven variables (earnings, prospect, social environment, physical environment, work intensity, skills and discretion, and work time quality) that are related to the multidimensional nature of work. The JQI has been considered for the present investigation because it is comprehensive in coverage, transparent in method, and widely employed in the research on job satisfaction and the quality of work in the European context (e.g., Erro-Garcés and Ferreira, 2019 ; Punzo et al., 2018 ; Soriano et al., 2018 ). It is the basis for the development of the sixth European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) which, according to Grimshaw et al. (2017) , yields solid and reliable information. In 2000, the EU launched the European Employment Strategy with the aim of creating more (quantity) and better (quality) jobs ( Ariza-Montes et al., 2019 ). EWCS asks workers about the intrinsic characteristics of their jobs: salary, hours, participation, organization, and security, among others. The EWCS has been used in previous studies in which the impact of working conditions on satisfaction is analyzed, but using different perspectives such as new technologies ( Castellacci and Viñas-Bardolet, 2019 ), gender issues ( Brinck et al., 2019 ; Gómez-Baya et al., 2018 ), and workers’ age ( Berde and Rigó, 2020 ; Okay-Somerville et al., 2019 ).

The tourism sector is characterized by high levels of seasonality, which leads to labor practices that do not favor workers’ commitment and permanence in the company in the long term ( Hofmann and Stokburger-Sauer, 2017 ). The characteristics of the job positions in the tourism sector are related to higher levels of job dissatisfaction compared to other industries, which explains why more than half of the workers in the tourism sector are dissatisfied and consider moving to other sectors ( Stamolampros et al., 2019 ). Factors explaining the low levels of job satisfaction observed in the tourism sector are related to characteristics of job positions and to the lack of professionalization of the human resources management in this industry ( Jovanović et al., 2019 ; Lillo-Bañuls et al., 2018 ; Zopiatis et al., 2014 ). On the one hand, the characteristics that make this sector present low levels of job satisfaction compared to other sectors are related to low salaries ( earnings ), long working hours ( work intensity ), low job security, and the scarcity of promotional possibilities ( prospects ) ( Zopiatis et al., 2014 ). The low work time quality of the jobs in the tourism sector is associated with the continuous relationship with customers, shift work, unsocial hours, and night work ( Lillo-Bañuls et al., 2018 ). This, together with the scarcity of occupational health and safety practices that favor an adequate physical environment , make employees working in this sector experience difficulties maintaining a work-life balance and a healthy lifestyle that would prevent stress and not lead to low levels of job satisfaction ( Hofmann and Stokburger-Sauer, 2017 ). This stress is increased by the lack of perceived organizational support and autonomy that characterize jobs in the tourism industry ( Loi et al., 2014 ; Tongchaiprasit and Ariyabuddhiphongs, 2016 ). The low levels of employee recognition, centralization in decision-making, and presentism that characterize this industry are associated with a lack of professionalization of human resources in the tourism industry ( Nickson, 2013 ). The degree to which employees perceive social support from their superiors (the quality of the social environment at work) and are provided with autonomy to perform their job ( skills and discretion ) highly determine employees’ level of satisfaction and work engagement since the social support of managers and supervisors influence workers´ perception of justice at the workplace ( Jovanović et al., 2019 ).

To obtain a comprehensive view of job satisfaction and its antecedents in the tourism sector, different dimensions must be considered. This study combines different factors that determine the quality of work (earnings, prospect, social environment, physical environment, work intensity, skills and discretion, and work time quality) to provide a holistic view of working condition that allows the comparison of the quality of work and the level of job satisfaction across Europe by relying on the employee’s own perspective.

2.2. Influence of the institutional context in job satisfaction

The EU´s regulations favor workers’ mobility within Europe. Labor mobility is the result of different levels of national unemployment rates, salary level, flexibility, etc. ( Fahri and Werning, 2014 ). Taking into account that the quality of employment varies across European countries, factors that strongly explain workers ´ mobility and differences in job satisfaction depending on the country can be observed, as indicated in the literature (e.g., Leineweber et al., 2016 ; Salpigktidis et al., 2016 ; Thite et al., 2012 ). These differences can be explained by the distinct institutional settings of each territory ( Salvatori, 2010 ). As derived from the premises of institutional theory, coercive pressures—especially national regulations—highly determine human resource management practices, so they might lead to differences in working conditions across countries ( Western, 1998 ). The different labor legislations across European territories, despite European countries sharing a supranational government, influence working conditions and job satisfaction ( Brewster and Hegewisch, 2017 ). According to institutional theory, in addition to the coercive pressures exerted by legislation in a country, there are normative pressures, which are related to the appropriate and desirable norms of behavior for both organizations and individuals that predominate in a country ( Acemoglu and Johnson, 2005 ; DiMaggio and Powell, 1983 ; Scott, 1987 ). These pressures also vary across territories and can be determinant in working conditions. Countries that present similar institutional contexts—that show similar coercive and normative pressures—might present differences in terms of employee job satisfaction. This could be the case in countries such as Denmark and Norway, which present both institutional and cultural similarities but significantly differ in their working conditions ( Bech et al., 2017 ).

Reviewing the literature, it can be observed that previous research has made efforts to identify blocks of European countries according to their institutional context (e.g., Albareda et al., 2007 ; Brookes and Barfoot, 2005 ; Filella, 1991 ; Ronen and Shenkar, 1985 ; Tangian, 2008 ). One of the most commonly used classifications identifies four clusters of countries in Europe: Anglo-Saxon (Ireland and the United Kingdom), Central European (Austria, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland), Latin (France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain) and Nordic (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) ( Filella, 1991 ; Ronen and Shenkar, 1985 ).

Numerous aspects of institutional context determine working conditions. Pichler and Wallace (2008) emphasize the key role played by four institutional factors in working conditions: economic conditions, unemployment rate, the national level of inequality, and the degree of unionization. Economic conditions of a territory highly impact the labor market in terms of job rewards in both extrinsic (average wage level, working hours, etc.) and intrinsic terms (meaningful, high-skilled jobs, etc.). The national unemployment rate and the national level of inequality also influence working conditions and job satisfaction. High levels of unemployment hinder job mobility regardless of a workers’ level of satisfaction. Employees, even those who are dissatisfied, will remain in their jobs because of the lack of opportunities in the labor market. The scarcity of job opportunities and the excess of job demand might lead employers to offer poorer conditions in terms of salary, working hours, etc. Socio-economic inequality is also a determinant of job dissatisfaction if employees perceive that similar jobs lead to great differences in economic outcomes. The degree of unionization in a country seems to be highly determinant of the average wage level and other conditions of work that influence the welfare of employees. In highly unionized countries, employees are more likely to find better jobs in terms of salary, working hours, etc. Accordingly, working conditions are generally better in countries that present a solid economic situation, a low unemployment rate, and a high level of unionization. This is the case for companies in the Nordic cluster, which have good working conditions in comparison with the rest of European companies ( Eskildsen et al., 2004 ). This can be explained by the high level of trade union intervention in those countries, where labor reforms encourage workers’ representatives to negotiate working conditions with trade unions.

As indicated in the literature, another institutional characteristic that determines working conditions is the country level of regulation ( Gialis et al., 2017 ; Keune and Jepsen, 2007 ). The level of regulation is closely related to the level of flexibility in the labor market and to the degree of job security ( Posada-Kubissa, 2018 ). Labor flexibility is negatively associated with job satisfaction and employees´ physical and psychological health since flexibility is associated with low levels of job security ( Carr and Chung, 2014 ; Probst et al., 2017 ). Flexibilization comes from deregulation; job security pursues the maintenance of social advantages through a compensatory system. Both depend on the country and are not only affected by economic conditions, but by collective agreements, and by the agents involved: governments, employers, and trade unions ( Tangian, 2007 ). In this line, Sapir et al. (2004) identified four different social systems within Europe according to the level of flexibility of each country. Gil-Alana et al. (2019) affirm that a robust social security system is associated with low levels of inequality.

From the aforementioned two premises are derived: (i) that the institutional context strongly influences working conditions and that these become a determinant factor in job satisfaction ( Williams and Hall, 2000 ); and (ii) that since institutional pressures are similar in each country block—Anglo-Saxon, Central European, Latin, and Nordic—similar working conditions within each cluster (intra-group similarities) and differences across clusters are expected (inter-groups differences). This is because, among other aspects, government regulations determine an organization’s freedom of action regarding employees’ minimum wages, training and development investments, working hours, etc. ( Vaiman and Brewster, 2015 ).

Although the influence of the institutional context on working conditions is expected, companies’ freedom of action within the framework of labor regulations is also expected to determine working conditions. In this way, workers in the tourism sector of countries with similar institutional settings could present discrepancies in their working conditions and, subsequently, in their job satisfaction. Providing evidence about this would justify the need to group countries according to their working conditions model, a categorization that would more accurately show the reality of the labor market from an employee's perspective. In order to address the research objectives, the methodology used to develop the empirical analysis is presented below.

3. Sample and method of research

3.1. sample.

To investigate differences in job satisfaction and in the quality of work among countries that show significant institutional differences, we have focused on the tourism sector due to the relevant role it plays in the European economy. The data used for the research were extracted from the sixth EWCS (the most recent available). This survey contains data on 43,850 working individuals 15 years old or older residing in private homes in one of the 33 European countries studied (28 countries of the EU; Albania; the former Yugoslav Republic countries of Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia; and Turkey). This survey was developed by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2020) (dependent on the European Commission) to obtain information on the quality of work and employment in Europe.

To perform the analysis, countries that present significant institutional and organizational differences were selected ( Filella, 1991 ; Ronen and Shenkar, 1985 ). The sample includes the following countries and country clusters: the United Kingdom and Ireland (Anglo-Saxon); Austria, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland (Central European); France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (Latin); and Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (Nordic). The sample used in this study is formed of 1633 employees of 16 European countries that work in the tourism sector. Table 1 shows the number of observations for each country cluster.

Tourism sector sample (country clusters).

To select workers from the tourism sector, the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community, NACE 1 codes were used. According to Eurostat, the following codes were included as part of the tourism sector: 491 (Passenger rail transport and interurban); 493 (Other passenger land transport); 501 (Sea and coastal passenger water transport); 503 (Inland passenger water transport); 511 (Passenger air transport); 551 (Hotels and similar accommodation); 552 (Holiday and other short-stay accommodation); 553 (Campgrounds recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks); 561 (Restaurants and mobile food service activities); 563 (Beverage serving activities); 772 (Rental and leasing of personal and household goods); 791 (Travel agency and tour operator activities); and 799 (Other reservation service and related activities). Filtering by these criteria, 1633 employees (7.2 % of 43,850) made up the sample.

3.2. Variables

We based our research on the sixth edition of the EWCS, which includes the dimensions of the European JQI developed by Parent-Thirion et al. (2016) . This index is formed of seven dimensions that determine working conditions: earnings, prospects, social environment, physical environment, work intensity, skills and discretion, and work time quality. 2 All the constructs used in the analysis except salary (expressed in euros) and job satisfaction (expressed on a four-point Likert scale) are numerical variables expressed on a scale of values between 0 and 100. According to Parent-Thirion et al. (2016) , the constructs were defined as follows:

Earnings : The importance of earnings as a motivational factor has been widely studied in the literature ( Suzuki et al., 2018 ). This construct is defined as the net hourly earnings of workers.

Prospects : This refers to the job characteristics that contribute to a person’s material and psychological needs, encompassing the need for income and for employment continuity. De Witte et al. (2016) point to these factors as determinants of job satisfaction.

Skill and discretion : This dimension refer to the skills required for the job and the level of job autonomy. Both are pointed to in the literature as relevant factors influencing job satisfaction since they enhance job identification and commitment ( Fregin et al., 2018 ; Mateos-Romero and del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, 2018 ).

Social environment : This dimension measures the social support perceived by employees (good social relations with line managers and fellow workers) and the absence of abuse in the company, which becomes especially important for workers’ welfare as it moderates the negative impact of stressors ( Wisse et al., 2018 ). This construct includes two constructs: adverse social behavior and social support.

Physical environment : This dimension refers to environmental hazards and to factors related to posture-related risks, which become relevant factors in the health of employees, a fundamental aspect of job hygiene and satisfaction ( Devonish, 2018 ; Koh et al., 2017 ).

Work intensity : This dimension refers to the intensity of work demands. High work intensity is associated with a risk of suffering high levels of occupational stress, which in turn is associated with low levels of job satisfaction ( Iranmanesh et al., 2017 ; Rushton et al., 2015 ).

Work time quality : This dimension refers to the organization and length of working time. The number of working hours, shift work, night work, etc., are determinant for the achievement of a good work/life balance, subsequently playing a significant role in job satisfaction ( Eagan et al., 2015 ; Roy, 2017 ).

Job satisfaction : The level of satisfaction is a variable included in the Sixth EWCS survey and is measured as a four-point Likert scale. The question is: “In general, are you very satisfied, satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with your working conditions?”.

All the items used for the construction of the variables are included in the sixth EWCS and are shown in the appendix, together with the results of the reliability tests obtained with the Cronbach alpha coefficient for the tourism industry.

3.3. Method of analysis

The main objective of the empirical analysis is to determine whether the classification of countries based on the institutional context adequately reflects the different models of working conditions—and subsequently differing levels of job satisfaction—existing in Europe in the tourism sector, and if not, to propose a more appropriate classification of countries. To do this, based on the classifications of Filella (1991) and Ronen and Shenkar (1985) , a comparison of working conditions among countries of the same clusters (intra-group comparison) is made. The existence of a high heterogeneity among countries of the same block would indicate an inappropriate grouping of countries located within the same institutional block. This analysis will be completed with an inter-group comparison, in which a high homogeneity in the working conditions of countries of different blocks would indicate a reduced discriminatory capacity among the blocks. Therefore, a high intra-group heterogeneity and a reduced inter-group heterogeneity would allow us to conclude that the classification made by previous studies does not correctly classify countries according to the labor conditions perceived by workers. Next, through a two-step cluster analysis, a new classification is proposed that improves intra-group homogeneity and inter-group heterogeneity. The suitability of this new group of countries will be evaluated using the methods previously described.

The normality of these variables was previously checked for the selection of the method of analysis. To address the research objectives, both inter-group and intra-group differences have been analyzed for both job satisfaction and working conditions. First, the analysis of inter-group differences—among country blocks—has been performed using the Mann-Whitney test. This technique allowed a comparison of the level of job satisfaction among country clusters (Anglo-Saxon, Central European, Latin and Nordic). Second, the existence of significant intra-group differences among countries within the same cluster in the level of job satisfaction have been studied using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests due to the ordinal nature of this variable. As the Mann-Whitney test can only be used to make comparisons between two groups, it has been employed to test the intra-group differences in the level of satisfaction within the Anglo-Saxon cluster (between Ireland and the United Kingdom). Since the Kruskal-Wallis test allows comparing more than two groups, it was used to analyze the existence of intra-group differences for the Central European, Latin, and Nordic clusters.

Working conditions have also been compared among country blocks (inter-groups) and among countries within the same block (intra-groups). First, the analysis of inter-group differences in working conditions has been performed using the t -Student test. This technique allowed the comparison of the working conditions among all the country blocks. Second, as working conditions (earnings, prospects, social environment, physical environment, work intensity, skills and discretion, and work time quality) are numeric variables and normally distributed, t-Student and analysis of variance (ANOVA) have been used to analyze the intra-group differences. As the t -Student test can only be used to compare two groups, it was employed to analyze the intra-group differences of working conditions within the Anglo-Saxon cluster. As ANOVA allows comparisons among more than two groups, it was used to assess the existence of intra-group differences among the Central European, Latin, and Nordic blocks.

The effect sizes have been estimated with the statistic proposed by Rosenthal (1994) for the Mann-Whitney contrasts (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 are used to indicate small, medium, and large effect sizes); Cohen’s d statistic for t-Student contrast (0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 are used to indicate small, medium, and large effect sizes), and η 2 statistic for the ANOVA test (0.01, 0.06, and 0.14 are used to indicate small, medium, and large effect sizes) proposed by Cohen (1977) . A ε 2 statistic is used for the Kruskal-Wallis test (0.01, 0.08, and 0.26 are used to indicate small, medium, and large effect sizes) ( Tomczak and Tomczak, 2014 ).

The existence of significant intra-group differences and limited differences among blocks of countries that present different institutional settings justifies the need for a new classification of European countries. To create this new grouping, a two-step cluster analysis has been developed. To confirm the validity of the proposed clusters, the intra-group and inter-group differences in the level of job satisfaction and in working conditions have been analyzed using the same statistical techniques previously explained.

The descriptive analysis of the data shows that the average age of employees of the sample is heterogeneous, standing at just over 40 years, with a standard deviation of 12.92 years. The male gender is slightly predominant; they represent 56.2 %, compared to 43.8 % of women, which contrasts with the existing proportion in this sector at the European level, where these proportions are inverse. Secondary education is the predominant level of education among workers in the sample (74.1 %), followed by university studies (19.1 %), and primary education (6.8 %). The most represented sub-sectors in the sample are "beverage serving activities," which represent the majority group (54.8 %), "passenger rail transport and interurban" and "other passenger land transport" (21.2 %), and accommodation ("hotels and similar accommodation," "holiday and other short-stay accommodation,” and “campgrounds recreational vehicle parks and trailer parks”) (15.1 %). Following the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08) based on OECD (2012), 71.8 % of the workers in the sample are “white collar” employees, of which less than a quarter are highly qualified. Within the “blue collar” employees—who represent 28.2 % of the total sample—only 7.5 % are considered highly qualified.

Presuming that the institutional environment is a factor that could significantly affect the degree of satisfaction of workers, in particular those who work in the tourism sector, we have explored the levels of job satisfaction across country blocks that present institutional differences. Using the Mann-Whitney test, we analyzed the differences among working conditions in country blocks with different institutional contexts. The results show that there are mainly significant differences in the level of satisfaction in the Latin countries with respect to the rest of the blocks, while the differences among the rest of the blocks are not significant. In addition, the effect size is very small, even in the case where the differences are significant ( Table 2 ). Hence, there is a high homogeneity in job satisfaction across country blocks that present different institutional settings.

Inter-groups differences in job satisfaction. Mann-Whitney test. P-value (Effect size).

When analyzing the intra-block differences, within the Nordic cluster, Denmark and Finland do not present any unsatisfied employees. About 90 % of employees present high and medium-high levels of satisfaction in Austria and Switzerland (within the Central European cluster), the latter not presenting any unsatisfied employees (see Table 3 ).

Intra-group differences in job satisfaction. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. P-value (Effect size).

The analysis of intra-group differences shows that these differences are significant; therefore, a lack of homogeneity in job satisfaction among countries in the same block is observed, mainly in the Central European and Nordic blocks, in which the effect size is medium. Accordingly, differences in the degree of job satisfaction among countries within the same block are found, indicating high intra-group heterogeneity.

The differences in working conditions among the blocks of countries identified in the literature—based on their institutional characteristics—were also studied. The results show that the Latin cluster presents significant differences with respect to the rest of the blocks in all the analyzed variables (except the social environment variable), with some effects of medium size. The results show the absence of significant differences between the Anglo-Saxon cluster and the Central European block in all the variables studied. The same is observed when comparing the former with the Nordic group, except in the labor expectations and the physical environment variables, although with a small effect. The differences between the Nordic and the Central European blocks are reduced since, in addition to finding differences in the previous variables, significant differences are also observed in the skills needed to develop the work, although with a small effect (see Table 4 ). Hence, there is a high homogeneity in the working conditions across country blocks that present different institutional settings.

Inter-group differences in working conditions. T-Student-test. P-value (Effect size).

Ang: Anglo-Saxon; Cen: Central European; Lat: Latin; Nor: Nordic.

Comparing the working conditions of the countries within each cluster, Ireland and the United Kingdom (Anglo-Saxon block) show a great homogeneity in all variables except salaries—workers in the tourism sector in the United Kingdom receive higher salaries than in Ireland. However, differences among countries of the same block are significant if we analyze the rest of the blocks, as can be extracted from the results of the intra-group ANOVA test (see Table 5 ). Among the Nordic countries, significant differences are observed in the prospects, physical environment, work intensity, and skills and discretion variables. The differences found among the countries of Central Europe are also significant. A high disparity in wages across countries within this block can be observed, motivated by the high average salary in Switzerland, followed by the significant differences in job prospects, in the social environment, and in the skills required for the jobs. Hence, the results indicate the existence of a high degree of heterogeneity in the working conditions of countries within the same block.

Intra-group differences in working conditions. ANOVA and T-Student tests. P-value (Effect size).

Based on the previous results which show differences in working conditions among the countries of the same block and scarce differences among blocks established according to their institutional characteristics (with the exception of the Latin cluster), we propose the creation of a classification of countries according to the similarity in their working conditions in the tourism sector, specifically from the seven JQI dimensions (earnings, prospects, social environment, physical environment, work intensity, skill and discretion, and work time quality). To create this new clustering, a two-step cluster analysis was performed (see Table 6 ).

Proposed country blocks according to their working conditions in the tourism sector.

The results of the cluster analysis show that, on the one hand, there are countries such as Greece and Spain (group 3) that show worse working conditions and, consequently, lower levels of job satisfaction in comparison with the rest of the countries. At the other extreme are Denmark, Finland, France, and Sweden (group 2), which present the most advantageous working conditions and the highest degree of job satisfaction. Finally, an intermediate group (group 1) including the rest of the countries can be found (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom).

To confirm the validity of these results (average silhouette value is greater than 0.5), the working conditions of the groups created and the job satisfaction among blocks and within blocks are analyzed. Regarding the latter, significant differences between clusters in terms of working conditions and job satisfaction are observed (see Table 7 ). Comparing job satisfaction among blocks, significant differences are observed. Likewise, analyzing the working conditions among blocks, differences among all of them exist, with the exception of clusters 1 and 2, which show similarity in their work time quality; and between clusters 2 and 3, which show similarity in physical environment and work intensity. There is a high heterogeneity in the variables related to working conditions in the three groups identified, endorsed by medium-high effect sizes in many of the comparisons that are also higher than the effects found in the original blocks identified in the literature.

Inter-group differences in working conditions and job satisfaction (proposed classification). t -test. P-value (Effect size).

Regarding the differences across countries within each cluster, it can be observed that there are no significant differences in job satisfaction among the countries that are part of the same block (see Table 8 ). Regarding working conditions, a high degree of homogeneity is observed. Countries in groups 2 and 3 show the greatest homogeneity in working conditions. Although there are significant differences, especially in group 1, the effect sizes are small. This is observed in the ANOVA test (except in earnings and, to a lesser extent, in prospects in group 1), and in the rest of the tests performed, as shown in Table 8 .

Intra-group differences in working conditions and job satisfaction (proposed classification). ANOVA test. P-value (Effect size).

The workers in the three defined blocks are homogeneous in terms of characteristics such as age, gender, seniority in the company, and the percentage of self-employed people, as shown in Table 9 .

Working conditions and demographic characteristics in the proposed blocks.

Studying the working conditions of each block, a great disparity between the salaries of groups 2 and 3 is observed. The group composed of Greece and Spain presents lower values in all variables except social environment and work intensity. Groups 1 and 2 show similar results, but working conditions are slightly more favorable in group 2. This group presents better results with respect to the rest in skills and discretion, intensity, and prospects, while group 1 shows more favorable conditions in the social environment and physical environment dimensions with respect to the rest.

5. Discussion

This research identifies a novel grouping of European countries according to the working conditions prevailing in the tourism sector. The differences among country clusters are manifested in different levels of employee satisfaction since the institutional context greatly influences working conditions, which in turn determines job satisfaction ( Salvatori, 2010 ; Western, 1998 ). Despite the relevant role of the institutional context—where planning and policymaking occur—in shaping working conditions, this issue has received little attention in the literature on tourism. Studies focused on institutional context and working conditions and job satisfaction in the tourism industry are rare. According to Western (1998) , working conditions are highly influenced by national regulations—and especially by labor regulations—and therefore by the institutional context. The strength of unionization becomes an important factor influencing job satisfaction because employees’ wellbeing is highly determined by salary and work intensity, among other working conditions, which are especially influenced by the levels of unionization ( Pichler and Wallace, 2008 ). Since strong unionization in a country can lead to better working conditions, the relevance of the institutional context as an antecedent of working conditions and job satisfaction must be highlighted.

Classifying European countries according to their working conditions can set the basis for a deeper understanding of the factors that determine job satisfaction in the tourism industry in different territories. As has been concluded from the analysis, a classification of countries based on their institutional characteristics as proposed by the previous literature (e.g., Albareda et al., 2007 ; Brookes and Barfoot, 2005 ; Filella, 1991 ; Ronen and Shenkar, 1985 ; Tangian, 2008 ) does not group countries correctly according to working conditions and job satisfaction perceived by workers. Few differences in worker satisfaction among countries that have different institutional settings and large differences among countries of the same institutional context have been found. Similarly, countries of different institutional environments have similar working conditions, while countries of the same context present large differences in working conditions. These results point to the need to propose a new classification or clustering of European countries according to their prevailing working conditions and job satisfaction levels. Although the comparison of job satisfaction across European countries has been studied by academics, previous studies have analyzed individual countries without considering the existence of homogeneity among countries and the existence of differentiated blocks in terms of their institutional setting. This research proposes a novel classification of countries according to prevailing labor conditions in each territory—what marks differences in job satisfaction across country clusters.

One of the key aspects that determines working conditions is labor flexibility, and this depends to a large extent on institutional context ( Posada-Kubissa, 2018 ). Tangian (2008) affirms that policies that enhance flexible employment are incompatible with achieving employment security. Carr and Chung (2014) propose that in countries where the levels of labor flexibility are high, employment security policies should be implemented to increase employees’ security. Therefore, different levels of employment protection and labor flexibility determine different social systems. Despite the EU ´s supranational government, there are differences in social systems across countries ( Brewster and Hegewisch, 2017 ). Sapir et al. (2004) identified four social models in Europe, each emphasizing security versus flexibility to a different extent: flex-insecure, inflex-secure, inflex-insecure, and flex-secure.

According to our analysis, group 1 corresponds to two groups of inflexible countries according to Sapir’s classification: The Continental cluster (inflexible and secure: Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Norway, the Netherlands, and Switzerland) and the countries included in the Anglo-Saxon block (inflexible and insecure: Ireland, Portugal, and the United Kingdom). The former are countries characterized by high income inequality, low-wage jobs, high levels of employment protection, low job security, and by early retirement pensions ( Sapir et al., 2004 ). According to the previous characteristics and inspired by Sapir et al. (2004) , we propose to call group 1 as inflexible group. According to Probst et al. (2017) , this model was considered to be effective in reducing poverty but ineffective in job creation in the long term. On the contrary, the Anglo-Saxon model is characterized by low-wage jobs, low job security, and high levels of income inequality. This model was effective in creating employment opportunities but ineffective in reducing poverty.

Group 2 resulting from our analysis corresponds to the Scandinavian model (Denmark, Finland, France, and Sweden). This country cluster is characterized by a robust social security system. Although job protection is low, employment security is high in comparison to the rest of the blocks. This model enhances job creation and a high standard of living. The countries grouped in this cluster present similar levels of employment protection and low levels of inequality ( Gil-Alana et al., 2019 ). Therefore, following Sapir et al. (2004) , we propose to call this country block as flex-secure .

Group 3 resulting from our analysis, the so-called Mediterranean model (Greece and Spain), emphasizes employment protection and early retirement pensions ( Probst et al., 2017 ). Inspired by Sapir et al. (2004) , this cluster could be called flex-insecure because both countries in this group show high levels of flexibility and insecurity. According to our results, Greece and Spain show homogeneity in their working conditions. These countries experienced a deep recession after 2008, leading to an economically inferior position within Europe. They are characterized by their weak institutions and the fiscal balance programs that have been implemented by their governments following the recession. Both countries have been highly affected by prolonged austerity policies and present the highest levels of unemployment in comparison to other European countries (36.8 % in Greece and 34.9 % in Spain), according to Eurostat (2018) . This can be an important factor that determines the differences found in this research in comparison with the blocks identified by the literature, which groups these two countries according to the institutional and organizational characteristics. While Filella grouped Italy, France, and Spain within the Mediterranean cluster in 1991, the socioeconomic development of each country has been different in the past decades. While France and Italy have improved their working conditions, Spain has remained among the countries with low job security and high flexibility in its labor market, which is reflected in the lowest levels of job satisfaction, showing more similarities to Greece in terms of working conditions and job satisfaction than to Italy and France.

6. Conclusion

Two main motivations led us to focus our analysis on the tourism sector: its high weight in the economy of European countries ( World Tourism Organization, 2018 ) and its characteristics that entail high levels of precariousness ( Jovanović et al., 2019 ). The results of the empirical analysis show that classifying countries according to their institutional setting does not properly reflect the differences in working conditions and job satisfaction across Europe. This study proposes a novel classification of European countries according to working conditions in order to understand the differences in job satisfaction in different European countries from an employee perspective. The results point to differences among countries that present similarities in their institutional context. This is observed in the higher levels of satisfaction that countries such as France, Italy, and Portugal present in comparison with Spain and Greece (all of them belonging to the same block according to previous studies). The great differences among countries that belong to the same block and the small differences in working conditions among the countries of different blocks (with the exception of the Latin cluster) lead us to posit the need to propose a novel classification of countries according to their working conditions.

Our research results show the existence of different models of working conditions in Europe that go beyond the national borders of each country. The existence of three differing working conditions models—and subsequent differences in the levels of job satisfaction—are determined not only by institutional factors, which are similar among some European countries, but by other factors that need to be further analyzed such as companies’ freedom of action in labor policies and workers’ perceptions. This follows from the results of our study, which show that the grouping of countries according to their institutional context does not correspond to the grouping of countries according to their working conditions. Therefore, it can be inferred that working conditions are not only a reflection of the institutional characteristics of the territories, but that other factors must be explored to understand the differences in working conditions and job satisfaction across Europe.

Although previous classifications of European countries according to their institutional context and the model of managing employees exist (e.g., Brewster and Tregaskis, 2003 ; Filella, 1991 ; Ignjatović and Svetlik, 2003 ; Nikandrou et al., 2005 ) that take into account different aspects such as regulatory framework, economic and legal characteristics, and the type of educational system prevailing in each country, our research highlights the need to complement these studies with the employee's perspective. Human resources policies are instruments that seek to ensure the proper functioning of organizations, but this will not be achieved if these policies do not generate job satisfaction. Hence, the relevance of complementing studies that adopt an organizational perspective with the employee's perception of their working conditions and level of job satisfaction.

The research makes several contributions to the literature. First, studies on the relationship between the institutional framework and working conditions in the tourism sector are rare. Previous research does not explore the differences between the framework in which the working conditions are developed (which is highly influenced by the institutional context where the company operates) and the labor conditions developed at the organizational level, both determining job satisfaction. Previous works that classify countries according to their institutional characteristics have only considered the framework in which working conditions are developed, ignoring that organizational management highly determines working conditions. In this vein, this study complements existing literature by proposing a novel classification of European countries based on the working conditions developed at the company level and by considering workers´ perceptions about these conditions and their job satisfaction.

On a practical level, the research shows how European countries are grouped according to workers' perceptions of their working conditions in the tourism sector. The results show that, although the institutional context is decisive in working conditions, these conditions are not determined entirely by these factors since there are territories with similar institutional settings but with substantially different working conditions. Grouping European countries according to their homogeneity in working conditions is particularly interesting for understanding international differences in job satisfaction since work satisfaction is a direct reflection of organizational policies and practices and the extent and character of institutionalized labor norms and regulations.

These results have implications for organizations and policy-makers. For organizations, assuming the freedom of movement of workers in Europe, companies can attract talented employees from different European countries if they improve their working conditions by assimilating them to the territories with higher levels of job satisfaction. For European policy-makers, interesting conclusions might be drawn from this research. To advance the EU convergence, it is necessary to homogenize the working conditions of the European countries, aiming to reach those conditions that achieve the highest degrees of job satisfaction. This will have benefits not only at the individual level, but also at the organizational and social levels. This need is especially emphasized in the uncertain context in which the tourism sector finds itself due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is difficult to predict the structural changes that the economic crisis expected after the pandemic will generate in the tourism sector, but it is expected that demand could contract in the near future due to the economic crisis predicted by international organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (2020) . The expected contraction in demand could be seen as an opportunity to create a more sustainable tourism model that prioritizes quality over quantity, a more balanced tourism model that distributes its value more equitably and fairly among the different stakeholders. Considering the fundamental role played by employees in the quality offered in the tourist service and their important contribution to business success in this sector, a model based on quality must be accompanied by better working conditions that result in greater employee wellbeing.

Despite the usefulness of this study, the results should be taken with caution due to the following methodological limitations. In the first place, job satisfaction is measured through self-perception, which can generate some bias in terms of the use of variables with an objective nature. Second, the problem of comparing countries involves the bias that is introduced regarding different variables such as salary, which cannot be compared in absolute terms without considering the cost of living, and the expectations of employees in each country. Future research could include perception variables about satisfaction with a salary instead of the salary in absolute terms to make the data comparable across countries. The classification of countries proposed by this study sets the basis for a deeper discussion on the factors—beyond the regulatory pressures that shape the institutional context—that influence working conditions. Therefore, future research could explore factors such as the culture that might be similar in each of the clusters identified and that can be determinants of job satisfaction. Finally, exploring job satisfaction in sectors different from tourism might lead to different groupings due to the specific characteristics of each sector. Therefore, future research could replicate this study in other industries.

1 For the French term " nomenclature statistique des activités économiques dans la Communauté européenne".

2 More detailed information on the construction of these indices can be found in Parent-Thirion et al. (2016) .

• Acemoglu D., Johnson S. Unbundling institutions. J. Polit. Econ. 2005; 113 (5):949–995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Albareda L., Lozano J.M., Ysa T. Public policies on corporate social responsibility: the role of governments in Europe. J. Bus. Ethics. 2007; 74 (4):391–407. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ariza-Montes A., Arjona-Fuentes J.M., Han H., Law R. The price of success: a study on chefs’ subjective well-being, job satisfaction, and human values. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018; 69 :84–93. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ariza-Montes A., Giorgi G., Hernández-Perlines F., Fiz-Perez J. Decent work as a necessary condition for sustainable well-being. A tale of Pi (i) gs and farmers. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (4):1051. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bech E.C., Borevi K., Mouritsen P. A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Comp. Migr. Stud. 2017; 5 (7):229–244. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Berde É., Rigó M. Job satisfaction at older ages: a comparative analysis of Hungarian and German data. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020; 53 (1):44–50. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Boon C., Paauwe J., Boselie P., Den Hartog D. Institutional pressures and HRM: developing institutional fit. Pers. Rev. 2009; 38 (5):492–508. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brewster C., Hegewisch A. Routledge; New York: 2017. Policy and Practice in European Human Resource Management: the Price Waterhouse Cranfield Survey. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brewster C., Tregaskis O. Convergence or divergence of contingent employment practices? Evidence of the role of MNCs in Europe. In: Cooke W.N., editor. Multinational Companies and Global Human Resource Strategies. Quorum books; London: 2003. pp. 143–166. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brinck K., Otten S., Hauff S. High‐performance work practices and job satisfaction: gender’s moderating role. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2019; 16 (2):333–345. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brookes G., Barfoot P. GM crops: the global economic and environmental impact—the first nine years 1996–2004. AgBioForum. 2005; 8 (2&3):187–196. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carr E., Chung H. Employment insecurity and life satisfaction: the moderating influence of labor market policies across Europe. J. Eur. Soc. Policy. 2014; 24 (4):383–399. [ Google Scholar ]
• Castellacci F., Viñas-Bardolet C. Internet use and job satisfaction. Comput. Human Behav. 2019; 90 :141–152. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cohen J. Academic Press; New York: 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dalkrani M., Dimitriadis E. The effect of job satisfaction on employee commitment. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Sci. Appl. Res. 2018; 11 (3):16–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• De Witte H., Pienaar J., De Cuyper N. Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies on the association between job insecurity and health and well‐being: is there causal evidence? Aust. Psychol. 2016; 51 (1):18–31. [ Google Scholar ]
• Devonish D. Effort-reward imbalance at work: the role of job satisfaction. Pers. Rev. 2018; 47 (2):319–333. [ Google Scholar ]
• DiMaggio P., Powell W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983; 48 (2):147–160. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dixit S., Dean A. The impact of talent management on job satisfaction and employee performance in public sector banks of Rajasthan. Int. J. Creative Res. Thoughts. 2018; 6 (1):425–435. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eagan M.K., Jr., Jaeger A.J., Grantham A. Supporting the academic majority: policies and practices related to part-time faculty’s job satisfaction. J. Higher Educ. 2015; 86 (3):448–483. [ Google Scholar ]
• Erro-Garcés A., Ferreira S. Do better workplace environmental conditions improve job satisfaction? J. Clean. Prod. 2019; 219 :936–948. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eskildsen J.K., Kristensen K., Westlund A.H. Work motivation and job satisfaction in the Nordic countries. Empl. Relat. 2004; 26 (2):122–136. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions . 2020. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/page/field_ef_documents/6th_ewcs_2015_final_source_master_questionnaire.pdf Retrieved from: [ Google Scholar ]
• Eurostat . 2018. Unemployment and Activity by Sex. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ Retrieved from: [ Google Scholar ]
• Fahri E., Werning I. Fiscal unions. Am. Econ. Rev. 2014; 107 (12):3788–3834. [ Google Scholar ]
• Filella J. Is there a Latin model in the management of human resources? Pers. Rev. 1991; 20 (6):14–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fregin M.C., Bijlsma I., Van der Velden R. Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA); 2018. Much Ado about Social Outcomes? (No. 002) [ Google Scholar ]
• Gialis S., Tsampra M., Leontidou L. Atypical employment in crisis-hit Greek regions: local production structures, flexibilization and labor market re/deregulation. Econ. Ind. Democr. 2017; 38 (4):656–676. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gil-Alana L.A., Škare M., Pržiklas-Družeta R. Measuring inequality persistence in OECD 1963-2008 using fractional integration and cointegration. Q. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2019; 72 :65–72. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goetz K., Jossen M., Szecsenyi J., Rosemann T., Hahn K., Hess S. Job satisfaction of primary care physicians in Switzerland: an observational study. Fam. Pract. 2016; 33 (5):498–503. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gómez-Baya D., Lucia-Casademunt A., Salinas-Pérez J. Gender differences in psychological well-being and health problems among European health professionals: analysis of psychological basic needs and job satisfaction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018; 15 (7):1474. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grimshaw D., Fagan C., Hebson G., Tavora I. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2017. Making Work More Equal: A New Labour Market Segmentation Approach. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hofmann V., Stokburger-Sauer N.E. The impact of emotional labor on employees’ work-life balance perception and commitment: a study in the hospitality industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2017; 65 :47–58. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ignjatović M., Svetlik I. European HRM clusters. EBS review. 2003;(17) [ Google Scholar ]
• International Monetary Fund . 2020. World Economic Outlook, April 2020: The Great Lockdown. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/weo-april-2020 Retrieved from. [ Google Scholar ]
• Iranmanesh M., Zailani S., Moeinzadeh S., Nikbin D. Effect of green innovation on job satisfaction of electronic and electrical manufacturers’ employees through job intensity: personal innovativeness as moderator. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2017; 11 (2):299–313. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jovanović T., Mijatov M., Dragin A.S., Simat K., Majstorović N. Identification of predictors’ effects on perceiving the ethical climate and job satisfaction within Serbian tourism industry. J. Manag. Organ. 2019:1–29. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jung Y., Takeuchi N. A lifespan perspective for understanding career self-management and satisfaction: the role of developmental human resource practices and organizational support. Hum. Relat. 2018; 71 (1):73–102. [ Google Scholar ]
• Keune M., Jepsen M. The European Commission’s Quest for Flexicurity. ETUI-REHS Brussels; 2007. Not balanced and hardly New. [ Google Scholar ]
• Koh S., Ong T., Samuel A. The impacts of physical, psychological, and environmental factors on employees’ job satisfaction among public accounting professionals in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Manage. Accounting J. 2017; 12 (2):129–156. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kong H., Jiang X., Chan W., Zhou X. Job satisfaction research in the field of hospitality and tourism. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage. 2018; 30 (5):2178–2194. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kramar R. Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014; 25 (8):1069–1089. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee Y.H., Chelladurai P. Emotional intelligence, emotional labor, coach burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in sport leadership. Eur. Sport. Manag. Q. 2018; 18 (4):393–412. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leineweber C., Chungkham H.S., Lindqvist R., Westerlund H., Runesdotter S., Alenius L.S., Tishelman C. Nurses’ practice environment and satisfaction with schedule flexibility is related to intention to leave due to dissatisfaction: a multi-country, multilevel study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016; 58 :47–58. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lillo-Bañuls A., Casado-Díaz J.M., Simón H. Examining the determinants of job satisfaction among tourism workers. Tour. Econ. 2018; 24 (8):980–997. [ Google Scholar ]
• Locke E.A., Smith P.C., Kendall L.M., Hulin C.L., Miller A.M. Convergent and discriminant validity for areas and methods of rating job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 1964; 48 (5):313. [ Google Scholar ]
• Loi R., Ao O.K., Xu A.J. Perceived organizational support and coworker support as antecedents of foreign workers’ voice and psychological stress. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014; 36 :23–30. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mahdieh N., Sotoudehnama E. 2018. Positive and Negative Perfectionism of EFL and non-EFL Major Graduate Students. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mateos-Romero L., del Mar Salinas-Jiménez M. Labor mismatches: effects on wages and on job satisfaction in 17 OECD countries. Soc. Indic. Res. 2018; 140 (1):369–391. [ Google Scholar ]
• Millán J.M., Hessels J., Thurik R., Aguado R. Determinants of job satisfaction: a European comparison of self-employed and paid employees. Small Bus. Econ. 2013; 40 (3):651–670. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nickson D. Routledge; New York: 2013. Human Resource Management for Hospitality, Tourism and Events. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nikandrou I., Apospori E., Papalexandris N. Changes in HRM in Europe: a longitudinal comparative study among 18 European countries. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 2005; 29 (7):541–560. [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Donoghue K., Tsui M. Social work supervision research (1970–2010): the way we were and the way ahead. Br. J. Soc. Work. 2013; 45 (2):616–633. [ Google Scholar ]
• Okay-Somerville B., Scholarios D., Sosu E. Work Orientations: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings. 2019. 9 Young workers’ job satisfaction in Europe; p. 193. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oliver R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980; 17 (4):460–469. [ Google Scholar ]
• Parent-Thirion A., Biletta I., Cabrita J., Vargas O., Vermeylen G., Wilczynska A., Wilkens M. Eurofound; 2016. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey: Overview Report. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2016/working-conditions/sixth-european-working-conditions-survey-overview-report Retrieved from: [ Google Scholar ]
• Pichler F., Wallace C. What are the reasons for differences in job satisfaction across Europe? Individual, compositional, and institutional explanations. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2008; 25 (5):535–549. [ Google Scholar ]
• Posada-Kubissa L. Reflexiones críticas sobre la prostitución desde el modelo abolicionista (Critical reflections on prostitution from the abolitionist model) Oñati Socio-Legal Series. 2018 Forthcoming. [ Google Scholar ]
• Probst T.M., Gailey N.J., Jiang L., Bohle S.L. Psychological capital: buffering the longitudinal curvilinear effects of job insecurity on performance. Saf. Sci. 2017; 100 :74–82. [ Google Scholar ]
• Punzo G., Castellano R., Buonocore M. Job satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: reasoning between feeling and uncertainty through CUB models. Soc. Indic. Res. 2018; 139 (1):205–236. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ronen S., Shenkar O. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1985; 10 (3):435–454. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H., Hedges L.V., editors. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation; New York: 1994. pp. 231–244. [ Google Scholar ]
• Roy D.F. In the Anthropology of Organizations. Routledge; 2017. “Banana time” job satisfaction and informal interaction; pp. 31–41. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rushton C.H., Batcheller J., Schroeder K., Donohue P. Burnout and resilience among nurses practicing in high-intensity settings. Am. J. Crit. Care. 2015; 24 (5):412–420. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salpigktidis I.I., Paliouras D., Gogakos A.S., Rallis T., Schizas N.C., Chatzinikolaou F., Lazopoulos A. Burnout syndrome and job satisfaction in Greek residents: exploring differences between trainees inside and outside the country. Ann. Transl. Med. 2016; 4 (22) [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salvatori A. Labour contract regulations and workers’ wellbeing: international longitudinal evidence. Labour Econ. 2010; 17 (4):667–678. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sapir A., Aghion P., Bertola G., Hellwig M., Pisani-Ferry J., Rosati D. The Sapir Report. OUP Oxford; 2004. An agenda for a growing Europe. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scott W.R. The adolescence of institutional theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 1987:493–511. [ Google Scholar ]
• Soriano A., Kozusznik M., Peiró J.M., Mateo C. Mediating role of job satisfaction, affective well-being, and health in the relationship between indoor environment and absenteeism: work patterns matter! Work, (Preprint) 2018:1–13. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Spector P.E. Vol. 3. Sage Publications; 1997. (Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences). [ Google Scholar ]
• Stamolampros P., Korfiatis N., Chalvatzis K., Buhalis D. Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in high contact services: insights from employees’ online reviews. Tour. Manag. 2019; 75 :130–147. [ Google Scholar ]
• Suzuki A., Mano Y., Abebe G. Earnings, savings, and job satisfaction in a labor-intensive export sector: evidence from the cut flower industry in Ethiopia. World Dev. 2018; 110 :176–191. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tangian A.S. 2007. Is Work in Europe Decent? A Study Based on the 4th European Survey of Working Conditions 2005. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-219237 Retrieved from: [ Google Scholar ]
• Tangian A. Is Europe ready for flexicurity? Empirical evidence, critical remarks and a reform proposal. Intereconomics. 2008; 43 (2):99–111. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thite M., Wilkinson A., Shah D. Internationalization and HRM strategies across subsidiaries in multinational corporations from emerging economies—a conceptual framework. J. World Bus. 2012; 47 (2):251–258. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tomczak M., Tomczak E. The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci. 2014; 1 (21):19–25. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tongchaiprasit P., Ariyabuddhiphongs V. Creativity and turnover intention among hotel chefs: the mediating effects of job satisfaction and job stress. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2016; 55 :33–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vaiman V., Brewster C. How far do cultural differences explain the differences between nations? Implications for HRM. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2015; 26 (2):151–164. [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dierendonck D., Lankester A., Zmyslona M., Rothweiler H. Linking HRM practices and institutional setting to collective turnover: an empirical exploration. Adm. Sci. 2016; 6 (4):18–34. [ Google Scholar ]
• Western B. ). Institutions and the labor market. In: Brinton M.C., Nee V., editors. The New Institutionalism in Sociology. Russell Sage Foundation; New York: 1998. pp. 224–243. [ Google Scholar ]
• Williams A.M., Hall C.M. Tourism and migration: new relationships between production and consumption. Tour. Geogr. 2000; 2 (1):5–27. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wisse B., van Eijbergen R., Rietzschel E.F., Scheibe S. Catering to the needs of an aging workforce: the role of employee age in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee satisfaction. J. Bus. Ethics. 2018; 147 (4):875–888. [ Google Scholar ]
• World Tourism Organization . 2018. European Union Tourism Trends. Retrieved from https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284419470. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zopiatis A., Constanti P., Theocharous A.L. Job involvement, commitment, satisfaction and turnover: evidence from hotel employees in Cyprus. Tour. Manag. 2014; 41 :129–140. [ Google Scholar ]