accessible tourism and sustainability a discussion and case study

Accessible tourism and sustainability: a discussion and case study

S. Darcy , Bruce Cameron , S. Pegg

Apr 23, 2010

Influential Citations

Quality indicators

Journal of Sustainable Tourism

Key Takeaway : Accessible tourism and triple-bottom-line sustainability are well-suited for meeting the needs of diverse markets, but require a more sophisticated understanding of accessible destination experiences for optimal success.

This paper explores the concept of accessible tourism and its links with triple-bottom-line (TBL) sustainability. Accessible tourism is reviewed through some of its central features including dimensions of access, universal design and the nexus between ageing and disability. The TBL is then examined to better understand the financial, environmental and social considerations that arise from accessible tourism. The research design used in this explorative research incorporated a case study approach, where a business case study instrument was developed. Methods included a Delphi group, review of management information systems, in-depth interviews with key informants, observation and participant observation. The study results revealed that rather than accessible tourism being a single construct, it forms one critical dimension of a series of interrelated, overlapping and interdependent business arrangements that extend beyond the business entity through a series of social networks within the destination region. It is argued that to properly satisfy the accessible tourism market, a more sophisticated understanding of accessible destination experiences is needed by tourism operators. The case study illustrates the considerable size and multi-niche markets served by accessible tourism destinations, the good fit between accessible tourism and TBL sustainable tourism, and the need for further research.

Accessible tourism futures: the world we dream to live in and the opportunities we hope to have

Journal of Tourism Futures

ISSN : 2055-5911

Article publication date: 14 September 2015

Accessible tourism is evolving as a field of academic research and industry practice, set within a dynamic social context. The field is interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary. The purpose of this paper is to examine key concepts and global initiatives that will shape accessible tourism futures.

Design/methodology/approach

Three of the authors have extensive academic experience in the area and the fourth author is the Managing Director of the pre-eminent European Network for Accessible Tourism. In taking a limited Delphi approach to canvassing key areas likely to shape accessible tourism futures, the following concepts and policy initiatives were examined: motivations, dreams and aspirations of people with disability; demography; UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; destination competitiveness; universal design (UD); and the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030.

A discussion of each of the above areas was placed in context to accessible tourism futures and to contextualise the papers that were selected for the special issue. The latter part of the paper outlines the contribution of each empirical paper to the issue discussing the approach, findings and implications. Stakeholder collaboration was identified as the key common theme of the papers and the factor for developing accessible tourism solutions, recognising the value of the market and capitalising on it. A collaborative approach is required to recognise the complementary nature of the different paradigms; to re-shape and transform the future of the accessible tourism industry. To assist in the development of accessible tourism futures, UD principles should provide a foundation to enhance the future competitiveness of tourism destinations and organisations.

Originality/value

The paper’s examination of the concepts and global policy considerations provides a strong academic and practitioner foundation for considering accessible tourism futures. In doing so, accessible tourism futures are shown to be affected by key concepts related to core tourism considerations and major policy initiatives on accessibility and sustainability. Yet, accessible tourism futures also have the potential to create their own momentum and contribute unique learnings on the diversity of tourism markets that will shape tourism concepts and global policy initiatives in their own right.

• Accessible tourism
• Tourism industry
• Organization practice
• Destination management

Michopoulou, E. , Darcy, S. , Ambrose, I. and Buhalis, D. (2015), "Accessible tourism futures: the world we dream to live in and the opportunities we hope to have", Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-08-2015-0043

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Eleni Michopoulou, Simon Darcy, Ivor Ambrose and Dimitros Buhalis

Published in the Journal of Tourism Futures . This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Introduction

This special issue was designed to examine the future dimensions of the intersection of disability and tourism in the emerging field of accessible tourism. The special issue explores theoretical approaches, foundations and issues in the study of accessible tourism from a futures perspective. Accessible tourism, as with any area of academic study is an evolving field of academic research and industry practice, set within a dynamic social context. The field is interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary, and is influenced by geography, ageing and disability studies, economics, public policy, psychology, law, architecture, construction sciences, technology and marketing. Past research has attempted to view, explain and unpack the inherent complexities ( Darcy, 2010 ) within accessible tourism through a variety of lenses, including human rights, critical tourism, embodiment, customer segmentation and universal design (UD), to name a few (see Buhalis and Darcy, 2011 ; Buhalis et al. , 2012 ).

The special issue is timely given the operationalisation of the United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities by 160 countries. Central to the convention is the right for tourists with disability to access transport and built environment in Article 9 and tourism experiences, goods and services within Article 30. It is therefore pertinent to look at the future of accessible tourism and contemplate a number of issues including (but not limited to) the role of technology in reshaping disability; if and how policy makers and planners are addressing the impact of accessible tourism in a sustainable manner; the political influence of people with disabilities, who make up the largest minority group in the USA, on the future of tourism; the science fiction of exoskeletons and gene therapy as a new form of adventure tourist; and the future state of embodied identity and accessible tourism.

The special issue provides the opportunity for contributors to take part in the current discourses on accessible tourism from a futures perspective, in order that we can understand, manage and contribute to the development of accessible tourism in the context of economically, socially and environmentally sustainable communities. Specific topics included conceptual and research papers, viewpoints and trend papers, both qualitative and quantitative, discussing topics relating to the future of accessible tourism. Papers include a range of issues including: inclusive destinations; accessible tourism in Development Planning (toward the UN Sustainable Development Goals 2030); policy-making for accessible tourism; embodiment; representation; law and legislation; architecture and universal design; inclusion/exclusion from experiences; markets and needs analysis; accessible transport; accessible events; accessibility and culture/heritage; accessible accommodation; education/training; and technology and applications.

In contrast to the past 30 years, where disability and tourism research has been largely concerned with overcoming barriers that exclude certain people (see Smith, 1987 ), we can discern the contours of new movements in accessible tourism, whereby overarching principles and standards of sustainability, social responsibility and customer service. The delivery of equitable tourism experiences demand the attention of sector actors and stakeholders. Accessible tourism, in this context, should be seen in the future as much more than a range of supports to excluded target groups, becoming a set of ground rules and codes of practice which contribute to the development of all tourism offers and destinations in an inclusive way.

If we should gaze into the crystal ball for a moment, we could envisage that tourism will not be defined primarily in terms of different target groups, since principles of responsibility, sustainability and accessibility will in the future inform the quality criteria to which all destinations should comply and be judged as part of destination competitiveness in increasingly global context. Customers will become more aware of their individual rights and also the need to protect and sustain communities and the natural environment, influencing tourism service providers to follow generally accepted rules of service quality, genuine interactivity and engagement with the local culture, people and resources.

The capability of tourism providers to recognise those rights for all (e.g. of tourists with disabilities, Design for All, responsible behaviour, inclusion of the local communities in a transparent system of remuneration and participation, working opportunities for socially excluded group etc.) is going to be the threshold, which determines whether their offers will succeed or fail in the future. The tourism sector will increasingly be seen as having transformational power as “a shaper of society”, acting as a promoter of jobs and economic growth, a participant in regional and community planning and a partner in global development programmes. In addition, tourism should be developed as industry that promotes understanding, inclusion and well-being for all in an equitable way.

Businesses, destinations and networks, that are already active in the field of accessible tourism and/or representing markets with different specific requirements will participate more widely in the mainstream, bringing their expertise and knowledge to bear on all those issues that are still seen as “different types of tourism”. In the development of accessible destinations and experiences, the United Nations World Tourism Organisation (2015) will be playing an increasingly supportive role, especially through its Global Code for Ethics in Tourism and the recently published Manuals on Accessible Tourism (2015) , produced by ONCE Foundation and the European Network for Accessible Tourism (2015b) .

Before discussing the papers that have been selected for publication we would like to set the scene by examining some major conceptual and policy development areas that we believe will have a significant influence on accessible tourism futures in the future. These include: dreams and aspirations of people with disability; demography; UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; destination competitiveness frameworks; UD; and the newly adopted UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030. Each of these areas of influence will now be outlined prior to the papers for the special edition being summarised for their contribution to the future of accessible tourism.

Defining and conceptualising accessible tourism

Accessible tourism is a form of tourism that involves collaborative processes between stakeholders that enables people with access requirements, including mobility, vision, hearing and cognitive dimensions of access, to function independently and with equity and dignity through the delivery of universally designed tourism products, services and environments. This definition adopts a whole of life approach where people through their lifespan benefit from accessible tourism provision. These include people with permanent and temporary disabilities, seniors, obese, families with young children and those working in safer and more socially sustainably designed environments (adapted from Darcy and Dickson, 2009, p. 34 in Buhalis and Darcy, 2011, pp. 10-11 ).

Importantly the definition recognises collaboration between stakeholders across demand, supply and coordination to recognise that disability is a complex construct involving mobility, vision, hearing, cognitive and other embodiments. The definition recognises that developing inclusive destinations and accessible tourism experiences also benefit other groups in the community. Hence, it contributes toward a greater social sustainability of the industry by including and, hence, providing for a much broader cross-section of consumers that has previously been considered by the industry. In understanding the importance of individuals with disability, the stakeholders they engage with and the influence of UD on the products, services and environments they wish to seek enabling experiences. Buhalis and Darcy (2011) suggests that to develop accessible tourism futures destination managers must strategically plan through the lens of UD. Figure 1 outlines the cyclical strategic approach to engaging UD approaches across disability and lifespan considerations as a foundation for developing future accessible destination experiences.

Dreams and aspirations of people with disability

The dreams and aspirations of individuals play a fundamental role in shaping the choices, which lead them to travel. Among people who live with a disability, the idea of leaving behind one’s everyday surroundings and going on a journey can create significant anxiety ( Darcy, 1998 ). People with disability often can design or influence their everyday environment whilst they have routines to negotiate any difficulties and thresholds that exist. This does not apply to new environments whilst travelling, where they do not have prior knowledge, networks or influence on the design nor the potential barriers that are to face and the way to overcome them. Indeed, a recent European survey ( GfK, 2015 ) suggests that up to half of people with disability do not travel on holiday, due to a combination of lack of reliable information, lack of funds and previous bad experiences. Yet, the desire to travel remains with studies showing that it is not a person’s impairment that impedes their travel but a series of interpersonal, attitudinal structural constraints ( Daniels et al. , 2005 ; Darcy, 2003 ). In recognising that a person's impairment does not constrain their travel motivations, the boundaries to what is regarded as accessible tourism destinations and experiences are continually pushed by the accessible explorers who forge new pathways for others to follow.

Human rights frameworks and social frameworks

The United Nations’ (2006) Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPWD) was introduced, recognizing that people with disability have a right to access services from all areas of citizenship including under Article 9 (related to transport and the built environment, and under Article 30 which relates to a “cultural life“ including leisure, sport and tourism). The CRPWD was written from a social model approach to disability that recognises that it is not the person’s impairment that “disables” someone from undertaking tourism experiences but the social, political and economic barriers that create the “disabling” tourism environment (see Barnes et al. , 2010 ; United Nations, 2006 ). This is very similar to Packer et al. (2007) research that discussed the interaction between those with disability, the tourism barriers they encounter including service attitudes that affect tourism participation adversely to people without disability. These types of it constraints and barriers in tourism have been the focus of a great deal of disability and tourism research, with the more recent research on accessible tourism seeking to focus on the development of “enabling” practice.

While “people with disability” suggests a homogenous group who can be dealt with as a “market segment”, the term belies a complexity that is multidimensional across mobility, vision, hearing, cognitive, mental health and other forms of embodiment ( Darcy and Buhalis, 2011 ; Small and Darcy, 2011 ). As outlined in the World Report on Disability, the underlying definitions of impairment and disability are contextual in the way they are operationalised across the globe ( World Health Organization and World Bank, 2011 ). What is not disputed is that about 15 per cent of the global population or some one billion people are living with a disability ( World Health Organization, 2013 ). Each person has unique abilities and disabilities, levels of support and assistive technology that creates a unique mix to consider with respect to the interaction with the tourism environment ( Packer et al. , 2007 ). Therefore the tourism environment of the future needs to be designed in a way that allows for interaction between a person’s abilities, their support needs and the assistive technologies to allow for the enjoyment of all.

Many people with disability can cite a plethora of examples of discrimination caused by negligent or unsuitable design or service provision. In the built environment, wheelchair users are frequently excluded by environmental barriers put in at the design stage: at railway platforms without lifts; at entrances to banks and businesses with revolving doors; and on pavements without dropped kerbs. The same design barriers, of course, are a challenge to parents with children in push-chairs and prams, shoppers with shopping bags, travellers with suitcases and employees occupational health and safety ( Darcy and Dickson, 2009 ). Past and current design practice leads in many ways to the discrimination of people with disability. Unsuitable design prevents access to goods and services and to major areas of social participation such as travel, work and full participation in civil, social and cultural life for the majority of people with disability. It also reduces their independence, dignity, equity and self-determination, thus giving rise to the misconception that disabled people are unable to travel by themselves.

respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one’s own choices, and independence of persons;

non-discrimination;

full and effective participation and inclusion in society;

respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity;

equality of opportunity;

accessibility;

equality between men and women; and

respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the right of children with disabilities to preserve their identities.

As stated, Article 9 provides a right to transportation and access to the built environment where Article 30 of the convention recognises the right to equal participation in tourism as an important part of any person’s citizenship. Some 160 nations have adopted the CRPWD. Yet, as already identified, people with disabilities participate less in all forms of citizenship where the transportation of people with disabilities to tourism destinations, access to accommodation and attractions is central to those rights. Yet, as documented in the USA, UK and Australia, a series of discriminatory tourism practices exist that curtail the potential of the citizenship rights ( Darcy and Taylor, 2009 ; Miller and Kirk, 2002 ; Ronald and Richard, 2001 ; Shaw et al. , 2007 ).

Millennium development goals (MDGs) and the UN global compact

Eradicating extreme poverty continues to be one of the main challenges of our time, and is a major concern of the international community. Ending this scourge will require the combined efforts of all, governments, civil society organizations and the private sector, in the context of a stronger and more effective global partnership for development. The Millennium Development Goals set timebound targets, by which progress in reducing income poverty, hunger, disease, lack of adequate shelter and exclusion – while promoting gender equality, health, education and environmental sustainability – can be measured. They also embody basic human rights – the rights of each person on the planet to health, education, shelter and security. The Goals are ambitious but feasible and, together with the comprehensive United Nations development agenda, set the course for the world’s efforts to alleviate extreme poverty by 2015 (United Nations Secretary-General BAN Ki-moon).

The aim of the MDGs is to encourage development by improving social and economic conditions in the world’s poorest countries. Since the MDG’s were agreed to significant progress has been made. To date average overall incomes have increased by approximately 21 per cent. The number of people living in extreme poverty declined by an estimated 130 million. Chile mortality rates fell from 103 deaths per 1,000 live births a year to 88. Life expectancy rose from 63 years to 65 years. An additional 8 per cent of the developing world’s people received access to clean water and an additional 15 per cent acquired access to improved sanitation services. In 2015 the UN countries will adopt a new sustainable development agenda and a new global agreement on climate change. The actions taken in 2015 are expected to result in new sustainable development goals that build on the eight MDG’s ( United Nations, 2015 ).

Tourism has long been seen as having significant potential to help achieve the MDG’s in developing countries. For example in 1990 developing countries had 18 per cent of international tourism receipts. By 2005 this had risen to 30 per cent and to date it continues to rise. There has been significant promotion of the direct economic links between tourists and the poor. Tourism may provide employment opportunities for marginalised groups, may bring direct income to individual communities and may promote equality in developing countries ( Saarinen and Rogerson, 2013 ).

UD supports destination competitiveness

Universal design is the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design. The intent of the universal design concept is to simplify life for everyone by making products, communications, and the built environment more usable by more people at little or no extra cost. The universal design concept targets all people of all ages, sizes and abilities’. The Universal Design approach goes beyond traditional design, which tends to focus on the ‘average’ user. Universal Design is a design approach, reflecting a way of understanding people’s needs. It is not a list of particular solutions, measurements, or products – Universal Design is the way to reach the solution, contributing to social inclusion (cited in Center for Universal Design, 2009 ; and first articulated by Mace, 1985 ).

Applying the principles of UD can be seen as a way of developing tourism environments, transportation, services and offers, underpinning sustainable communities and businesses. Today, according to a recent study by European Network for Accessible Tourism (2015a) and partners, less than 10 per cent of tourism suppliers in Europe offer “accessible” tourism services, while demand for such services is set to increase due to the ageing population and continuing upward trend in market demand. Adopting UD enlarges the target markets of destinations as well as ensures that more pleasant experiences can be delivered. Therefore it can increase the market base, reduce seasonality and support the competitiveness of destinations ( Buhalis, 2000 ). Yet, few studies have examined accessible tourism in relation to destination management and only recently has accessible tourism been examined from destination competitiveness perspective ( Domínguez Vila et al. , 2015 ).

Papers in this issue

To address these concepts and developments this special issue is bringing a range of papers together that discuss research on many accessibility tourism aspects.

Naniopoulos and Tsalis (2015) discuss a methodology for addressing the accessibility of monuments. They focus on heritage attraction sites, highlighting the challenges with archaeological sites where interventions become problematic or even impossible. In doing so, they approached accessibility as a dual notion; accessibility of an area and its potential for independent physical access and movement around the monuments as well as perceived accessibility in terms of interpreting, understanding and learning from the environment. The methodology was applied to a number of byzantine monuments as part of a cultural route in the city of Thessaloniki in Greece, as case studies. Results provide both tools for assessing monument accessibility (process orientations and checklists) and insights into the needs of travellers with disabilities for more “usable” heritage attractions. Concluding remarks place a focus on the prerequisites of training and cooperation to allow for the future of accessible monuments to be realised.

Tsalis et al. (2015) provide an interesting study on the challenges of implementing accessibility solutions, also within the context of protection, conservation, and management of historical centres and monuments. Viewed from a tourism perspective, archaeological sites and monuments are location bound and exist only in their original place. Hence, access to such sites enables unique and authentic tourism experiences. Discourses on objective, constructive and existential authenticity are of paramount importance when accessibility is concerned. This study provides relevant examples of accessibility interventions on six monuments as well as considerations on the design of the tools that assisted site interpretation and interconnection in a cultural route. Results demonstrate how accessibility improvements can occur while respecting the history, architecture and character of the monuments. The study concludes by emphasizing that it is primarily through providing greater access, that the “socialisation” of these monuments will propagate authentic tourism experiences in the future.

Bowtell (2015) offers an examination of the market value and attractiveness of accessible tourism in Europe. Historic data were used to provide a forecast for 2025, while primary data obtained from travel and leisure companies provided insights into managerial perceptions. Findings show a very promising potential for accessible tourism market with significant projected revenues. However, a number of challenges including lack of awareness, cost of investments, complexity of customers’ needs and legal inconsistencies within the EU, create barriers toward developing comprehensive solutions for accessible tourism. Authors provide recommendations on bridging demand and supply.

Gillovic and McIntosh (2015) present an interesting study on stakeholder perspectives of the future of accessible tourism in New Zealand. The study provides insights into the current situation and the future propensity for an accessible tourism industry in New Zealand. A number of interviews with key stakeholders revealed that there is a need to develop a culture of accessibility that is perceived as the norm. Findings also include the business and demand arguments, but additionally highlighted the “ineptness” of upper industry levels to recognize the opportunity of accessible tourism, exhibiting apathy and complacency instead. Authors conclude with recommendations for the future of accessible tourism in New Zealand which can easily be generalised for other regions.

Zajadacz (2015) discusses the evolution of models of disability as a basis for the future development of accessible tourism. A review of medical, social, biopsychosocial, geographical and economic models of disability reveals the theoretical underpinnings and assumptions entailed in those. These are then linked to tourism, demonstrating that different models influence the tourism provision in terms of both products and services. Authors highlight the understanding of disability under different models toward diverse tourism experiences. Several suggestions are offered on the complementary of the models and the implications on the transformation of the accessible tourism industry in the future.

Cruces Portales (2015) uses a scenario planning approach to envisage alternative futures for accessible tourism. With a timeframe leading to 2050, four alternative futures are unravelled through storytelling. The scenarios are built on a matrix that includes the opposing forces of empathy – apathy, and fear of loss and certainty of benefits. The resulting, aptly named scenarios (Eden Gardens, Golden Bridge, Wasted Future and State of Hope) showcase different behaviours, schedules of changes and insights. Authors conclude with strategic ideas and proposals for the future of accessible tourism.

When exploring the future of tourism in this area two opposing trends can be observed: future societies are predicted to become more similar, more homogenous as a consequence of consumerism, globalisation and converging urban lifestyles. However, the accessible tourism market is characteristically diverse, with complex needs and the range of dreams and ambitions is boundless. Will future global travellers be able to access more varied and personal services or will increasing numbers of travellers give rise to greater standardization of services?

Accessible tourism as an emerging field of study will influence tourism destination competitiveness in the future, whether that be from a human rights, emerging market segment or service delivery perspective. In this conceptual examination, we have presented implications of number of theoretical constructs and lenses through which accessible tourism will be influenced in the future. In this special issue, a number of future dimensions are explored that demonstrate how the field has moved from an examination of the intersection of disability and tourism, to one that is clearly defined through conceptual and definitional approaches as accessible tourism. There is a common thread amongst all the papers presented in this special issue. They focus around stakeholder collaboration, as a foundation for the future development of accessible tourism. It has been explicitly suggested that raising awareness amongst stakeholders is essential to overcome barriers inhibiting the application of solutions that enhance access. The importance of stakeholder collaboration across the accessible tourism value chain has been emphasized in a number of ways in this special issue.

Improving accessibility of facilities, transportation, attractions and destinations more generally, demands the collaboration of a wide range of stakeholders including architects, designers, economists, local councils, policy makers, travellers with disabilities, historians and archaeologists to name a few. Therefore “socialising” tourism means that access can be granted only when a number of relevant stakeholders are in accord, work together and specifically developed strategies to target the accessible tourism market. Stakeholder collaboration is a key factor for developing accessible tourism solutions, recognising the value of the market and capitalising on it. Hence, a collaborative approach is required to recognise the complementary nature of the different paradigms; to re-shape and transform the future of the accessible tourism through influencing the tourism industry, contributing government organisations and the not-for-profit sectors. The strength and depth of stakeholder collaborations will determine alternative future realities; from a future where all cooperate and share benefits for all parties, to a fatalistic picture where each stakeholder is sailing alone because they consider their interests incompatible, and everything in between. UD should provide a better accessible tourism future that should enhance the competitiveness of tourism destinations and organisations.

Universal approaches

Barnes, C. , Mercer, G. and Shakespeare, T. ( 2010 ), Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction , Polity Press , Malden, MA .

Bowtell, J. ( 2015 ), “ Assessing the value and market attractiveness of the accessible tourism industry in Europe: a focus on major travel and leisure companies ”, Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 201 - 20 .

Buhalis, D. ( 2000 ), “ Marketing the competitive destination of the future ”, Tourism Management , Vol. 21 No. 1 , pp. 97 - 116 .

Buhalis, D. and Darcy, S. (Eds) ( 2011 ), Accessible Tourism: Concepts and Issues , Channel View Publications , Bristol .

Buhalis, D. , Darcy, S. and Ambrose, I. (Eds) ( 2012 ), Best Practice in Accessible Tourism: Inclusion, Disability, Ageing Population and Tourism , Channel View Publications , Bristol .

Buhalis, D. , Michopoulou, E. , Eichhorn, V. and Miller, G. ( 2005 ), Accessibility Market and Stakeholder Analysis – One-Stop-Shop for Accessible Tourism in Europe (OSSATE) , University of Surrey , Guildford .

Center for Universal Design ( 2009 ), “Universal design principles”, available at: www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm (accessed 20 May 2009) .

Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J.L. ( 1966 ), The Economics of Outdoor Recreation , Johns Hopkins Press , Baltimore, MD .

Cruces Portales, R. ( 2015 ), “ Removing ‘invisible’ barriers: opening paths towards the future of accessible tourism ”, Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 267 - 82 .

Daniels, M.J. , Rodgers, E.B.D. and Wiggins, B.P. ( 2005 ), “ ‘Travel tales’: an interpretive analysis of constraints and negotiations to pleasure travel as experienced by persons with physical disabilities ”, Tourism Management , Vol. 26 No. 6 , pp. 919 - 30 .

Darcy, S. ( 1998 ), Anxiety to Access: Tourism Patterns and Experiences of New South Wales People with a Physical Disability , Tourism New South Wales , Sydney .

Darcy, S. ( 2003 ), “Disabling journeys: the tourism patterns of people with impairments in Australia”, paper presented at the Riding the Wave of Tourism and Hospitality Research, CAUTHE – Southern Cross University, Lismore, 5-8 February .

Darcy, S. ( 2010 ), “ Inherent complexity: disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences ”, Tourism Management , Vol. 31 No. 6 , pp. 816 - 26 .

Darcy, S. and Buhalis, D. ( 2011 ), “ Conceptualising disability ”, in Buhalis, D. and Darcy, S. (Eds) , Accessible Tourism: Concepts and Issues , Chapter 2 , Channel View Publications , Bristol , pp. 21 - 44 .

Darcy, S. and Dickson, T. ( 2009 ), “ A whole-of-life approach to tourism: the case for accessible tourism experiences ”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management , Vol. 16 No. 1 , pp. 32 - 44 .

Darcy, S. and Taylor, T. ( 2009 ), “ Disability citizenship: an Australian human rights analysis of the cultural industries ”, Leisure Studies , Vol. 28 No. 4 , pp. 419 - 41 .

Domínguez Vila, T. , Darcy, S. and Alén González, E. ( 2015 ), “ Competing for the disability tourism market – a comparative exploration of the factors of accessible tourism competitiveness in Spain and Australia ”, Tourism Management , Vol. 47 , pp. 261 - 72 .

European Network for Accessible Tourism ( 2015 a), Final Report: EU Study Mapping in Performance Check on the Supply of Accessible Tourism Services in Europe , European Network for Accessible Tourism , Brussels .

European Network for Accessible Tourism ( 2015 b), “Who we are”, available at: www.accessibletourism.org/?i=enat.en.who_we_are (accessed 15 August 2015) .

GfK ( 2015 ), Economic Impact on Travel Patterns of Accessible Tourism in Europe – Final Report , GfK, University of Surrey, The Neumann Consulting and PRO Solutions , Surrey .

Gillovic, B. and McIntosh, A. ( 2015 ), “ Stakeholder perspectives of the future of accessible tourism in New Zealand ”, Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 221 - 37 .

Leiper, N. ( 2003 ), Tourism Management , 3rd ed. , Hospitality Press , Sydney .

Mace, R. ( 1985 ), Universal Design, Barrier Free Environments for Everyone , Designers West , Los Angeles, CA .

Miller, G.A. and Kirk, E. ( 2002 ), “ The disability discrimination act: time for the stick? ”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism , Vol. 10 No. 1 , pp. 82 - 8 .

Naniopoulos, A. and Tsalis, P. ( 2015 ), “ A methodology for facing the accessibility of monuments developed and realised in Thessaloniki, Greece ”, Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 238 - 51 .

Naniopoulos, A. , Tsalis, P. , Papanikolaou, E. , Kalliagra, A. and Kourmpeti, C. ( 2015 ), “ Accessibility improvement interventions realised in Byzantine monuments of Thessaloniki, Greece ”, Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 252 - 66 .

Packer, T.L. , McKercher, B. and Yau, M. ( 2007 ), “ Understanding the complex interplay between tourism, disability and environmental contexts ”, Disability & Rehabilitation , Vol. 29 No. 4 , pp. 281 - 92 .

Ronald, K. and Richard, P. ( 2001 ), “ Reasonable accommodation under the ADA: what’s an employer to do? ”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly , Vol. 42 No. 5 , pp. 24 - 33 .

Saarinen, J. and Rogerson, C.M. ( 2013 ), “ Tourism and the millennium development goals: perspectives beyond 2015 ”, Tourism Geographies , Vol. 16 No. 1 , pp. 23 - 30 .

Shaw, G. , Veitch, C. and Coles, T. ( 2007 ), “ Disability legislation and the empowerment of tourists with disabilities in the UK ”, in Church, A. and Coles, T. (Eds) , Tourism, Power and Space , Routledge , London , pp. 83 - 100 .

Small, J. and Darcy, S. ( 2010 ), “ Tourism, disability and mobility ”, in Cole, S. and Morgan, N. (Eds) , Tourism and Inequality: Problems and Prospects , Chapter 4 , CABI , Wallingford , pp. 1 - 30 .

Small, J. and Darcy, S. ( 2011 ), “ Understanding tourist experience through embodiment: the contribution of critical tourism and disability studies ”, in Buhalis, D. and Darcy, S. (Eds) , Accessible Tourism: Concepts and Issues , Chapter 5 , Channel View Publications , Bristol , pp. 72 - 96 .

Smith, R.W. ( 1987 ), “ Leisure of disabled tourists – barriers to participation ”, Annals of Tourism Research , Vol. 14 , pp. 376 - 89 .

United Nations ( 2006 ), Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , United Nations General Assembly A/61/611 – 6 December , New York, NY .

United Nations ( 2015 ), “Time for Global Action for people and planet”, available at: www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ (accessed 14 August 2015) .

United Nations World Tourism Organisation ( 2015 ), Manuals on Accessible Tourism , United Nations World Tourism Organisation, ONCE & European Network for Accessible Tourism , Madrid .

World Health Organization ( 2013 ), “Disability – report by the Secretariat”, available at: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA66/A66_12-en.pdf (accessed 18 September 2015).

World Health Organization and World Bank ( 2011 ), “World report on disability”, available at: www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/index.html (accessed 18 September 2015).

Zajadacz, A. ( 2015 ), “ Evolution of models of disability as a basis for further policy changes in accessible tourism ”, Journal of Tourism Futures , Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 187 - 200 .

Further reading

United Nations World Tourism Organization ( 1999 ), “Global code of ethics for tourism”, available at: http://ethics.unwto.org/en/content/global-code-ethics-tourism (accessed 21 August 2015) .

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Accessible tourism and sustainability: a discussion and case study

Author: darcy, simon, author: cameron, bruce, author: pegg, shane.

This paper explores the concept of accessible tourism and its links with triple-bottom-line (TBL) sustainability. Accessible tourism is reviewed through some of its central features including dimensions of access, universal design and the nexus between ageing and disability. The TBL is then examined to better understand the financial, environmental and social considerations that arise from accessible tourism. The research design used in this explorative research incorporated a case study approach, where a business case study instrument was developed. Methods included a Delphi group, review of management information systems, in-depth interviews with key informants, observation and participant observation. The study results revealed that rather than accessible tourism being a single construct, it forms one critical dimension of a series of interrelated, overlapping and interdependent business arrangements that extend beyond the business entity through a series of social networks within the destination region. It is argued that to properly satisfy the accessible tourism market, a more sophisticated understanding of accessible destination experiences is needed by tourism operators. The case study illustrates the considerable size and multi-niche markets served by accessible tourism destinations, the good fit between accessible tourism and TBL sustainable tourism, and the need for further research.

Accessible Tourism Research

The blog seeks to present a brief history of accessible tourism through reviewing key documents and presenting new research as it is published. Central to the examination of the history of the field and contemporary innovation, is an understanding that accessible tourism is complex, multilayered and involves stakeholders from the commercial, government and the third sectors. Solutions need to be developed through collaboration and understanding stakeholder perspectives.

All abilities trek to the summit of Mount Kosciuszko - Australia's highest peak

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Accessible tourism and sustainability: a discussion and business case study.

"The research project was an STCRC scoping project to formulate a procedure for undertaking accessible tourism business cases. The project sought to case study examples of high standard accessible tourism product, facility or experience. The accessible tourism market is comprised of seniors and people with disabilities with access needs. It is recognised in the literature that there are significant barriers that constrain the tourism experiences of the group. A key component in the constraint is the supply of accessible tourism product and the understanding of the elements of business success with the market by the tourism industry. The methodology was informed by a case study approach and the triple bottom line scorecard. The research design sought to expand the thinking in general business performance more broadly than financial measures. The evaluation of environmental and social benefits has become part of core corporate practice. The preliminary work utilised a Delphi group to identify a range of high standard of accessible product, across states, segments and reflecting a range of ownership structures. The next stage involved developing Business Case Instrument to ‘capture’ triple bottom line metrics. The ‘metrics’ were collected through reviews of management information systems, in-depth interviews with key informants and review of other performance information. The research resulted in five business case studies on which the refined Business Case Instrument was based. This will assist the industry stakeholders to understand the components likely to be present when a destination experience meets the needs of travellers with a disability. The research suggests that provision can be improved by each organisation but that provision of access will not be the only factor present in a business successfully meeting the needs of travellers seeking an accessible destination experience. The purpose of this technical report is to document and present the business case instrument" (Darcy, et al., 2008, p. v).

No comments:

Post a comment, total pageviews, popular posts.

• Amazon.com: Senseable Travel: Travel Tips for Families Affected by Autism, Sensory Processing Disorder and Developmental Disorders eBook: Jennifer Logan: Kindle Store An interesting new book on travelling with people affected by autism and developmental disability Amazon.com: Senseable Travel: Travel Tip...
• ability (1)
• accessibility (5)
• accessible (24)
• accessible tourism (72)
• Accessible Tourism disability (1)
• accessible Tourism for All (1)
• accommodation (11)
• activities (13)
• Adriatic (1)
• advocacy (2)
• advocacy groups (1)
• Airlines (10)
• airport (2)
• Airports (5)
• and wheelchair (2)
• Argentina (2)
• Asia Pacific (1)
• athletes (1)
• attitudes (6)
• attractions (3)
• Australasian (1)
• Australia (19)
• Australian bureau of statistics (1)
• Australian human rights commission (1)
• autoethnography (1)
• Bangkok (1)
• Barcelona (2)
• barrier free (1)
• barrier-free tourism (39)
• barriers (30)
• behaviour (1)
• Beijing (1)
• benefits (1)
• Bibione (1)
• blind or vision (26)
• boomers (1)
• Brazil (12)
• Brisbane (1)
• Budapest (1)
• business case study (4)
• cheating (1)
• citizenship (2)
• classification (2)
• cognitive (6)
• Colosseum (1)
• Commonwealth Games (1)
• compensation (1)
• competitiveness (2)
• conference (7)
• constraints (9)
• conversions (1)
• cost of disability (1)
• critical tourism (1)
• cross cultural (4)
• cultural (1)
• customer service (3)
• definition (1)
• demographic (2)
• destination (15)
• destination development (1)
• destination marketing (1)
• destinations (2)
• development (2)
• disability (74)
• disability movement (1)
• disability studies (1)
• disability tourism (1)
• disability type (1)
• discrimination (11)
• economic (4)
• economic contribution (1)
• economic development (1)
• economic impact (3)
• economics (2)
• education (1)
• embodiment (23)
• employees (1)
• employment (3)
• England (1)
• estimates (5)
• European Union (1)
• experiences (33)
• fan zone (1)
• Federal court action (1)
• focus groups (1)
• framework (1)
• geographies of disability (1)
• Germany (1)
• grassroots sport (1)
• Great Britain (1)
• guide dogs (1)
• hearing (13)
• heritage (1)
• history (1)
• Holidays (1)
• Hong Kong (5)
• hopeful tourism (1)
• hospitality (4)
• human rights (6)
• immobilities (1)
• inclusive (8)
• inclusive tourism (38)
• information (7)
• information sources (1)
• infrastructure (1)
• innovation (1)
• insurance (1)
• intellectual (5)
• international (1)
• International organisation for standardisation (1)
• International Paralympic Committee (1)
• international tourism (1)
• Julia Haraksin (1)
• Kevin Cocks (1)
• Kuala Lumpur (1)
• Legislation (2)
• leisure (1)
• liability (1)
• life satisfaction (1)
• local government (1)
• Lonely Planet (1)
• Malaysia (1)
• management (1)
• managers (1)
• marketing (2)
• medical conditions (1)
• medication (1)
• meetings (1)
• Melbourne (1)
• mobilities (2)
• Mobility (27)
• modelling (1)
• modifications (1)
• Montréal (2)
• motivations (24)
• Murrays Australia Ltd (1)
• national (1)
• National Rugby league (1)
• New South Wales (1)
• new technology (1)
• New Zealand (9)
• Newcastle (1)
• nondisabled (2)
• numbers (5)
• observation (1)
• Olympic (3)
• Olympics (27)
• omission (1)
• ONCE Foundation (2)
• Online resources (1)
• operators (1)
• oration (1)
• overnight stays (1)
• Pacific (1)
• Paralympic (3)
• Paralympic movement (1)
• Paralympics (27)
• parking stations (1)
• patterns (4)
• people with disability (4)
• physical (2)
• planning (2)
• politics (2)
• poverty (1)
• private vehicles (1)
• promotion (1)
• public policy (2)
• publication (3)
• purchase intention (1)
• purple pound (1)
• push pull factors (3)
• quadriplegia (1)
• quality (2)
• quality of life (1)
• quantitative (1)
• Queensland (2)
• questionnaire (1)
• reflexive (1)
• regional (1)
• research (16)
• resources (1)
• restaurants (1)
• Rio Paralympic games (1)
• Robert Jones (1)
• roll in shower (1)
• San Francisco (1)
• Sargood on Collaroy (1)
• satisfaction (4)
• security (1)
• seniors (4)
• service blueprinting (1)
• service stations (1)
• service-dominant logic (1)
• shopping centres (1)
• sighted guides (1)
• sign language (1)
• Simon Darcy (2)
• Singapore (1)
• Social diversity (1)
• social enterprise (1)
• Social inclusion (2)
• social participation (1)
• social tourism (1)
• sociodemographic (1)
• Special Olympics (1)
• stakeholders (2)
• standardisation (1)
• statistics (7)
• strategy (1)
• support needs (1)
• sustainability (3)
• technical committee (1)
• Thailand (2)
• the Colosseum (1)
• the equality of experience (1)
• Toilets (1)
• tourism (45)
• Tourism Australia (1)
• tourism industry (1)
• tourism planning (1)
• Tourism Research Australia (1)
• tourist experience (1)
• transport (32)
• transportation (1)
• travel behaviour (2)
• travel chain (4)
• travel patterns (3)
• Traveleyes (1)
• trip chain (1)
• UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (1)
• unconscious bias (1)
• united nations (6)
• United States (7)
• United States of America (1)
• universal design (18)
• value creation (2)
• Vancouver (1)
• Village for All (1)
• vision (12)
• vision impairment (1)
• walking (1)
• websites (1)
• wellness (1)
• wheelchair (2)
• wilderness (4)
• women's World Cup 2015 (1)
• workplace (1)
• World Expo (2)
• world Summit (1)
• World Tourism Day (1)
• World Tourism Organisation (4)
• wounded warriors (1)

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Accessible tourism and sustainability: a discussion and business case study

Abstract This paper explores the concept of accessible tourism and its links with triple-bottom-line (TBL) sustainability. Accessible tourism is reviewed through some of its central features including dimensions of access, universal design and the nexus between ageing and disability. The TBL is then examined to better understand the financial, environmental and social considerations that arise from accessible tourism. The research design used in this explorative research incorporated a case study approach, where a business case study instrument was developed. Methods included a Delphi group, review of management information systems, in-depth interviews with key informants, observation and participant observation. The study results revealed that rather than accessible tourism being a single construct, it forms one critical dimension of a series of interrelated, overlapping and interdependent business arrangements that extend beyond the business entity through a series of social networks within the destination region. It is argued that to properly satisfy the accessible tourism market, a more sophisticated understanding of accessible destination experiences is needed by tourism operators. The case study illustrates the considerable size and multi-niche markets served by accessible tourism destinations, the good fit between accessible tourism and TBL sustainable tourism, and the need for further research. Keywords: accessible tourism; business case study; business case instrument; triple bottom line; universal design; ageing; disability

Related Papers

Journal of Sustainable Tourism

Simon Darcy , Shane Pegg

… , Australia: Sustainable Tourism …

Tanya Packer , Simon Darcy

The research project was an STCRC scoping project to study a procedure for undertaking accessible tourism business cases. The project sought to case study examples of high standard accessible tourism product, facility or experience. The accessible tourism market is comprised of seniors and people with disabilities with access needs. It is recognised in the literature that there are significant barriers that constrain the tourism experiences of the group. A key component in the constraint is the supply of accessible ...

Simon Darcy

"Summary This book brings together global expertise in planning, design and management to inform and stimulate providers of travel, transport, accommodation, leisure and tourism services to serve guests with disabilities, seniors and the wider markets that require good accessibility. Selected country reports, detailed case studies and technical guidance from leading experts provide an essential resource for academics and practitioners. Key features - Provides Best Practice in Accessible Tourism from a global pespective - Explores a range of approaches to delivering accessible tourism from the perspectives of policy-making, professional and stakeholder networking, market diversity, destination management and the experience economy; - Contains chapters by leading experts with state-of-the-art guidance for the development of accessible tourism infrastructure, transport and services; - Draws together examples of best practice encompassing policies, projects and partnerships in and between the public, private and NGO sewctors , demonstrating the added value of holistic, evidence-based solutions. Review: In 25 chapters, Best Practice in Accessible Tourism provides a ‘state-of-the-art” assessment of both theory and practice. This book establishes a new field of study and provides the benchmark against which other contributions will be judged. It integrates the work of all the key players and should be read by academics, managers and government policy makers. Noel Scott, University of Queensland, Australia The editors have assembled an excellent compilation of thought provoking, cutting edge international chapters on "Best Practice in Accessible Tourism". The text provides important insights into current practices and policies, but also critically reflects on what more needs to be done. This timely work is a must read for practitioners, policy makers and academics. David J. Telfer, Brock University, Canada Author Biography: Professor Dimitrios Buhalis is a Strategic Management and Marketing expert with specialisation in Technology and Tourism at Bournemouth University. Professor Buhalis is leading eTourism research and he is a Fellow of the International Academy for the Study of Tourism and the President of the International Federation for Information Technologies in Travel and Tourism (IFITT).; Dr Simon Darcy is an Associate Professor in Events, Sport and Tourism at the UTS Business School - University of Technology, Sydney. Simon’s research and teaching expertise is in sport, tourism and diversity management. He currently holds research grants investigating organisational responses to accessible tourism, sports management practices and protected area visitor management systems.; Ivor Ambrose is the Managing Director and co-founder of ENAT, the European Network for Accessible Tourism. He has worked for over 30 years as a researcher, project manager, development and policy advisor in the fields of building design and evaluation, public housing, accessibility and assistive technologies for disabled and elderly people, accessible tourism and information systems. Readership Level: Postgraduate, Research / Professional, Undergraduate "

Professor Dimitrios Buhalis , Simon Darcy

Purpose – Accessible tourism is evolving as a field of academic research and industry practice, set within a dynamic social context. The field is interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary. The purpose of this paper is to examine key concepts and global initiatives that will shape accessible tourism futures. Design/methodology/approach – Three of the authors have extensive academic experience in the area and the fourth author is the Managing Director of the pre-eminent European Network for Accessible Tourism. In taking a limited Delphi approach to canvassing key areas likely to shape accessible tourism futures, the following concepts and policy initiatives were examined: motivations, dreams and aspirations of people with disability; demography; UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; destination competitiveness; universal design (UD); and the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030. Findings – A discussion of each of the above areas was placed in context to accessible tourism futures and to contextualise the papers that were selected for the special issue. The latter part of the paper outlines the contribution of each empirical paper to the issue discussing the approach, findings and implications. Stakeholder collaboration was identified as the key common theme of the papers and the factor for developing accessible tourism solutions, recognising the value of the market and capitalising on it. A collaborative approach is required to recognise the complementary nature of the different paradigms; to reshape and transform the future of the accessible tourism industry. To assist in the development of accessible tourism futures, UD principles should provide a foundation to enhance the future competitiveness of tourism destinations and organisations. Originality/value – The paper's examination of the concepts and global policy considerations provides a strong academic and practitioner foundation for considering accessible tourism futures. In doing so, accessible tourism futures are shown to be affected by key concepts related to core tourism considerations and major policy initiatives on accessibility and sustainability. Yet, accessible tourism futures also have the potential to create their own momentum and contribute unique learnings on the diversity of tourism markets that will shape tourism concepts and global policy initiatives in their own right.

Ivor Ambrose

Purpose -Accessible tourism is evolving as field of academic research and industry practice, set within a dynamic social context. The field is interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary. The paper examines key concepts and global initiatives that will shape accessible tourism futures. Design/Methodology/Approach -three of the authors have extensive academic experience in the area and the fourth author is the Managing Director of the pre-eminent European Network for Accessible Tourism. In taking a limited Delphi approach to canvassing key areas likely to shape accessible tourism futures, the following concepts and policy initiatives were examined: motivations, dreams and aspirations of people with disability; demography; UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; destination competitiveness; universal design; and the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030. Findings -a discussion of each of the above areas was placed in context to accessible tourism f...

Drawing on the last 15 years of research, policy and industry engagement, a way forward for accessible tourism is presented. The approach is based on the development of strategic knowledge management to provide a reliable foundation on which to make informed choices for accessible destination experiences and create a relationship of trust between consumers and suppliers. First, demand research is examined to understand what consumers with disabilities seek when planning their trips and the experiences they desire when travelling. Second, the plenary connects the demand requirements of consumers with disabilities to that of the supply-side approaches of the industry and suggests that government coordination roles at national and regional levels have very important roles to play in developing a triple bottom line approach to accessible tourism. Lastly, an argument is presented that suggests that only by understanding accessible tourism as part of social and environmental sustainability can a sound foundation be put in place to develop the economic potential of this group. Keywords: accessible tourism; strategic knowledge management; triple bottom line sustainability; trust;

Simon Darcy , Elina (Eleni) Michopoulou

RAFAEL CRUCES PORTALES

Sustainability

Ana Belén Mudarra Fernández

The inclusion of people with disabilities (PwD) in tourism is a phenomenon that encompasses various influencing factors, such as accessibility, which must be reviewed for this process to work correctly. Accessible tourism has advantages for both people with disabilities and everyone else. It provides an opportunity for everyone to enjoy leisure without barriers. However, there are still factors that limit the proper operation of the sector, which require a review and new strategies for its improvement. The objective of this review is to offer a synthesis of those challenges that must be addressed in order to achieve quality accessible tourism, as well as to present the various emerging trends that can represent an important advance for the future of accessible tourism. To this end, a qualitative study review process has been carried out where the different opinions and perceptions of the various actors involved in the accessible tourism sector are considered. A thematic analysis and...

La circulación de las ideas de América Latina-Caribe por el mundo, 1970-2000,

Eduardo Devés

RELATED PAPERS

Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology

Fatih Akbulut

Journal of Food Engineering

Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya (JB&P)

Muhimatul Umami

ITINERÁRIOS – Revista de Literatura

MARIA CECILIA COLOMBANI

Mladika, Trst

Mitja Petaros

IEEE Access

Physica B: Condensed Matter

Phạm Hồng Quang

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Ilina Singh

International Journal of Systems Science

George Halikias

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Jacqueline Vaissermann

Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa

Alejandra Campos

Call Girl Contact Number Surat

saumya arora

Derin Tarih

Oktay Türkoğlu

Nadya Mincheva

International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences

Madhuri Jha

St. Tikhon's University Review

Iuliia Gracheva

• Mathematics

Maria A Pascali

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Jeremia Shale Sefadi

S. Underwood

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Accessible Tourism: The Demand-Side Perspective

• First Online: 30 August 2023

Cite this chapter

• Vania Vigolo 4 &
• Francesca Simeoni 4  

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

106 Accesses

Accessibility is beneficial for anyone facing challenges in experiencing tourism, not only for people with disabilities. Therefore, the demand for accessible tourism is highly diverse and warrants in-depth analysis. Based on a systematic review of the scientific literature published since 2010, this chapter investigates the aspects characterizing the demand for accessible tourism. The analysis led to the identification of five major themes: market dimension and value, tourist experiences, travel motivations, travel constraints, and travel needs. Practical implications are derived for destination management organizations and tourism companies wishing to improve the accessibility of their offerings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A Systematic Literature Review on Accessible Tourism and Marketing Strategies: Where Do We Stand

Tourism for All: From Customer to Destination after COVID-19

Special Interest Travel: Reflections, Rejections and Reassertions

S. Darcy, B. McKercher, S. Schweinsberg, From tourism and disability to accessible tourism: a perspective article. Tour. Rev. 75 , 140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2019-0323

G. Qiao, L. Ding, L. Zhang, H. Yan, Accessible tourism: a bibliometric review (2008–2020). Tour. Rev. 77 , 713 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-12-2020-0619

J.A.C. Soler, M.B. Díaz, P.S. Vera, El turismo social accesible como nuevo modelo turístico [Accessible social tourism as a new tourist model], Cuadernos de Turismo 41 , 139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.6018/turismo.41.326981

L. Rubio-Escuderos, H. García-Andreu, E. Michopoulou, D. Buhalis, Perspectives on experiences of tourists with disabilities: implications for their daily lives and for the tourist industry. Tour. Recreat Res. 10 (1080/02508281), 1981071 (2021)

Google Scholar  

S. Darcy, T.J. Dickson, A whole-of-life approach to tourism: the case for accessible tourism experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 16 , 32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.32

World Tourism Organization, Manual on Accessible Tourism for All: Principles, Tools and Best Practices—Module I: Accessible Tourism—Definition and Context (UNWTO, 2016). https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284418077

D. Popović, I. Slivar, M. Gonan Božac, Accessible tourism and formal planning: current state of Istria County in Croatia. Adm. Sci. 12 , 181 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040181

G. Qiao, Y. Cao, J. Zhang, Accessible tourism—understanding blind and vision-impaired tourists’ behaviour towards inclusion. Tour. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-03-2022-0129

V. Eichhorn, Economic impact and travel patterns of accessible tourism in Europe—final report (European Commission, Director-General Enterprise and Industry, 2014). https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/5566/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native

G. Sakalauskaitė, D. Šaparnienė, I. Reinholde, Accessible tourism development in the post-Soviet country context: a case of Klaipėda City, Lithuania. Sci. Pap. Univ. Pardubice Series D Fac. Econ. Adm. 28 , 126 (2020)

World Tourism Organization, Highlights of the 1st UNWTO Conference on Accessible Tourism in Europe (San Marino, 19–20 November 2014) (UNTWO, 2016). https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284417902

A. Tlili, F. Altinay, Z. Altinay, Y. Zhang, Envisioning the future of technology integration for accessible hospitality and tourism. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 33 , 4460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-03-2021-0321

A. Giusti, A. Viviani, Social diversity: a look at tourism. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 4 , 57 (2013). www.journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/389

World Tourism Organization, Manual on Accessible Tourism for All: Public–Private Partnerships and Good Practices (UNWTO, 2015). https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284416585

D. Damiasih, A. Palestho, A.A.G. Raka, H. Kurniawan, P. Pebriani, S. Suhendroyono, A.A.G.R. Gunawarman, P. Maulidimas, Comprehensive analysis of accessible tourism and its case study in Indonesia. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 13 , 995 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.4(60).08

UNWTO International Network of Sustainable Tourism Observatories (INSTO), Webinar on Accessibility: Measuring the Economic Impact of Accessible Tourism within the European Union and Beyond (2021, 7th September). https://www.unwto.org/event/technical-insto-webinar-on-accessibility

D. Denyer, D. Tranfield, Producing a systematic review, in The SAGE Handbook Of Organizational Research Methods , ed. by D.A. Buchanan, A. Bryman (SAGE Publications, 2009), p. 671

R. Yung, C. Khoo-Lattimore, New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Curr. Issues Tour. 22 , 2056 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359

D. Agapito, The senses in tourism design: a bibliometric review. Ann. Tour. Res. 83 , 102934 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102934

S. Darcy, Inherent complexity: disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences. Tour. Manag. 31 , 816 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.010

S. Darcy, B. Cameron, S. Pegg, Accessible tourism and sustainability: a discussion and case study. J. Sustain. Tour. 18 , 515 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003690668

M. Agovino, M. Casaccia, A, Garofalo, K. Marchesano, Tourism and disability in Italy. Limits and opportunities. Tour. Manag. Perspect 23 , 58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.05.001

T. Domínguez, J.A. Fraiz, E. Alén, Economic profitability of accessible tourism for the tourism sector in Spain. Tour. Econ. 19 , 1385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2013.0246

J. Bowtell, Assessing the value and market attractiveness of the accessible tourism industry in Europe: a focus on major travel and leisure companies. J. Tour. Futures 1 , 203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/jtf-03-2015-0012

B. Gillovic, A, McIntosh, C. Cockburn-Wootten, S. Darcy, Experiences of tourists with intellectual disabilities: a phenomenological approach. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 48 , 155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.06.003

J.Y. Chung, H. Lee, Desired recreation companionship and travel behaviour of people with disabilities. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 24 , 314 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1564343

F. Ali, L. Cain, T.S. Legendre, L. Wu, The intersection of technology, accessible tourism and tourists with intellectual disabilities: proposing a novel conceptual framework. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221142499

F. Rahmafitria, P. Dirgahayani, H.P.H. Putro, A. Rosyidie, D. Hudalah, Tourism accessibility in protected islands: the case of the Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Tour. Rev. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2022-0110

A. Moura, C. Eusébio, E. Devile, The ‘why’ and ‘what for’ of participation in tourism activities: travel motivations of people with disabilities. Curr. Issues Tour. 26 , 941 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2044292

A, Gassiot Melian, L. Prats, L. Coromina, The perceived value of accessibility in religious sites—do disabled and non-disabled travellers behave differently? Tour. Rev. 71 , 105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-11-2015-0057

J.J. Nigg, M. Peters, The evolution of ICTs in accessible tourism: a stakeholder collaboration analysis. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 52 , 287 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.07.007

A.F.A. Moura, E. Kastenholz, A.M.S. Pereira, Accessible tourism and its benefits for coping with stress. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leisure Events 10 , 241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290077-5

M. Allan, Accessible tourism in Jordan: travel constrains and motivations. Eur. J. Tour. Res. 10 , 109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v10i.182

S. Mahmoudzadeh, N.K. Sarjaz, Environmental barriers to tourism development for people with disabilities. Acta Turistica 30 , 87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22598/at/2018.30.1.87

A. De Pascale, M. Meleddu, T. Abbate, M. Pellicano, M. Is there a gender gap in the propensity to travel of people with disabilities? J. Travel Res. 62 , 517 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211073976

V. Vigolo, Older Tourist Behavior and Marketing Tools (Springer International Publising, Cham, 2017)

Book   Google Scholar  

Y.K.P. Wan, W.S.S. Lo, M.E. Eddy-U, Perceived constraints and negotiation strategies by elderly tourists when visiting heritage sites. Leis Stud. 41 , 703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2022.2066710

S.F. Gregory, Diving with dignity? Older women scuba divers, constraints and accessible tourism on the Great Barrier Reef. Ann. Leis. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2022.2041449

M. Eddy-U, T.I.W. Kong, Y.K.P. Wan, Senior travelers to integrated resorts: preferences, consuming behaviors and barriers. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 21 , 297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008x.2019.1659209

P. Teixeira, C, Eusébio, L. Teixeira, Website accessibility in the hospitality industry: a study in the central region of Portugal. Int. J. Tour. Policy 11 , 222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtp.2021.118666

K.L. Lam, C.-S. Chan, M. Peters, Understanding technological contributions to accessible tourism from the perspective of destination design for visually impaired visitors in Hong Kong. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 17 , 100434 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100434

E. Devile, E. Kastenholz, Accessible tourism experiences: the voice of people with visual disabilities. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events 10 , 265 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2018.1470183

A.J. McIntosh, The hidden side of travel: epilepsy and tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 81 , 102856 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102856

D. Freund, M. Cerdan Chiscano, G. Hernandez-Maskivker, M. Guix, A. Iñesta, M. Castelló, Enhancing the hospitality customer experience of families with children on the autism spectrum disorder. Int. J. Tour. Res. 21 , 606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2284

E. Nyman, K. Westin, D. Carson, Tourism destination choice sets for families with wheelchair-bound children. Tour. Rec. Res. 43 , 26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2017.1362172

E. Figueiredo, C. Eusébio, E. Kastenholz, How diverse are tourists with disabilities? A pilot study on accessible leisure tourism experiences in Portugal. Int. J. Tour. Res. 14 , 531 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1913

D. Buhalis, E. Michopoulou, Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: addressing the accessibility market. Curr. Issues Tour. 14 , 145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683501003653361

A. Marasco, B. Balbi, Designing accessible experiences for heritage visitors through virtual reality. e-Rev. Tour. Res. 17 , 426 (2019)

E. Michopoulou, D. Buhalis, Information provision for challenging markets: the case of the accessibility requiring market in the context of tourism. Inf. Manag. 50 , 229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.04.001

A. Zajadacz, Sources of tourist information used by deaf people. Case study: the polish deaf community. Curr. Issues Tour. 17 , 434 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.725713

A. Naniopoulos, P. Tsalis, D. Nalmpantis, An effort to develop accessible tourism in Greece and Turkey: the MEDRA project approach. J. Tour. Futures 2 , 56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/jtf-03-2015-0009

J. Small, S. Darcy, T. Packer, The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: management implications beyond the visual gaze. Tour Manag. 33 , 941 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.09.015

S. Darcy, Developing sustainable approaches to accessible accommodation information provision: a foundation for strategic knowledge management. Tour. Rec. Res. 36 , 141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2011.11081315

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Vania Vigolo & Francesca Simeoni

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vania Vigolo .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Management, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Fabio Cassia

Paola Castellani

Chiara Rossato

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Vigolo, V., Simeoni, F. (2023). Accessible Tourism: The Demand-Side Perspective. In: Cassia, F., Castellani, P., Rossato, C. (eds) Accessible Tourism in the Digital Ecosystem. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38782-1_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38782-1_2

Published : 30 August 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-38781-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-38782-1

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research