saucony excursion test

Go Running Fast

Stride into 42K Triumph

Top rated products

Product tags

Main categories.

Activity & Fitness Trackers
Camping Headlamps
Heart Rate Monitors
Hydration Packs
Reflective Gear
Boys' Running Clothing
Girls' Activewear Skirts & Skorts
Boys' Running Shoes
Men's Running Shoes
Running GPS Units
Running Waist Packs

Saucony Excursion Tr15: The Ultimate Trail Running Shoe Review

Get ready to take on the trails like never before with the Saucony Excursion Tr15! This trail running shoe has everything you need to conquer rugged terrains and leave your worries behind. With durable 6mm lugs, supportive overlays, and VERSARUN cushioning, it’s the perfect blend of performance and protection. Say goodbye to impact and trail hazards, and say hello to your new trail-running companion. Lace up and let’s hit the trails together!

Browse This Article:

Saucony Trail Running Shoe: Excursion Tr15

Good fit for size 11
Well-built and durable
Lightweight
Comfortable
Good grip on dry trails
Correct fit and comfort
Great traction
Breathable in hot weather
Plenty of room in the toe box
Split on both shoes in less than 12 months
Grip is poor on wet rocks

The Saucony Men’s Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe is a reliable and high-quality option for your outdoor adventures. With its durable construction, you can trust that it will withstand the demands of rugged trails and harsh terrains. The 6mm lugs on the outsole are designed to provide you with steady footing, ensuring that you can navigate steep inclines and slippery surfaces with confidence.

One of the key features of this shoe is its supportive upper overlays, which are designed to give you a secure fit. Whether you’re tackling rocky terrain or uneven surfaces, these overlays will keep your foot snugly in place, preventing any unwanted movement. This is especially important when it comes to trail running, as a secure fit can help reduce the risk of injuries.

Additionally, the Saucony Men’s Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe features VERSARUN cushioning, which plays a crucial role in protecting your feet from impact and trail hazards. Whether you encounter rocks, roots, or uneven surfaces, this cushioning system will help absorb the shock, keeping your feet comfortable and protected throughout your run.

Superior Traction : The Excursion Tr15 is equipped with an aggressive outsole that provides excellent traction on various terrains, making it perfect for trail running enthusiasts
Durable Construction : Built to withstand the demands of off-road running, these shoes feature a rugged design and durable materials that hold up well over time
Comfortable Fit : With a cushioned insole and padded collar, these shoes offer a plush and snug fit that ensures maximum comfort throughout your trail runs
Breathable : The Excursion Tr15 incorporates breathable mesh upper, allowing air to circulate and helping to keep your feet cool and dry, even during intense workouts
Protective Toe Cap : To shield your toes from rocks, roots, and other obstacles, these shoes come with a reinforced toe cap that adds an extra layer of protection
Versatile Performance : Whether you’re tackling muddy trails or rocky paths, the Excursion Tr15’s rugged construction and traction ensure reliable performance on any terrain

Overall, the Saucony Men’s Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe is a reliable and trustworthy choice for any trail runner. Its durability, supportive overlays, and VERSARUN cushioning make it well-suited for tackling challenging terrains while keeping your feet secure and comfortable. So, lace up these shoes and hit the trails with confidence!

Durable 6mm lugs on the outsole
Supportive upper overlays
VERSARUN cushioning
Protects from impact and trail hazards

The Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe is a versatile and stylish footwear option for both running and everyday use. With its lightweight construction, durable build, and comfortable fit, this shoe has garnered positive reviews from many satisfied users. However, it’s important to note that there have been a few negative experiences as well. In this review, we will explore the features of the Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe, taking into account both the positive and negative feedback from users.

Key Features and Benefits

The Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe is designed to provide a correct fit and lasting comfort. From the reviews, it is evident that many users have found the shoe to fit just right, with no issues of being too tight or too big. The well-built construction ensures durability, allowing users to enjoy these shoes for several years. The lightweight design of the shoe not only enhances the overall comfort but also makes it an ideal choice for activities like running and hiking.

Positive Reviews

Among the positive reviews, users have praised the Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe for its stylish appearance, lightweight design, and excellent comfort. Many have found them to be perfect for running, sightseeing, and everyday wear. The shoe’s grip on dry trails has been frequently commended, making it suitable for various outdoor activities. Several users have even mentioned that these shoes offer ample toe box room, allowing for a comfortable fit throughout the day.

Negative Reviews

While most users have had a positive experience with the Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe, there have been a few negative reviews as well. Some users have expressed disappointment with the grip on wet surfaces, stating that it is poor and poses a challenge, especially on wet rocks or slippery trails. Additionally, a few users have found the insoles and midsoles to be stiff, leading to discomfort during extended periods of standing.

Final Thoughts

Taking into account the feedback from users, the Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe proves to be a reliable choice for outdoor activities and everyday wear. Its lightweight design, durability, and correct fit make it a popular option for runners and hikers alike. However, if you frequently encounter wet or slippery terrains, you may need to consider alternative shoes with better grip. Overall, the Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe offers a good balance of style, comfort, and performance, making it a worthwhile investment for many individuals.

Your Expert Guide to the Saucony Excursion TR15: Unleash Your Trail Running Potential!

Discover the Best Alternatives to the Saucony Excursion TR15 Trail Running Shoe

What to consider when choosing the perfect pair of trail running shoes

When selecting trail running shoes, there are a few factors to consider that will ensure you find the perfect fit for your adventures. First and foremost, prioritize the shoe’s grip and traction, as trails can be unpredictable and slippery. Look for shoes with lugged outsoles made of durable rubber. Secondly, consider the shoe’s support and cushioning. Trail running can be challenging for your feet, so opt for shoes with ample cushioning, but ensure they still offer enough responsiveness. Additionally, pay attention to the shoe’s protection features such as a reinforced toe cap and rock plate to shield your feet from potential hazards. Moreover, consider the shoe’s fit and comfort. Ensure they have a snug fit but still allow for natural movement. Lastly, pay attention to the shoe’s breathability and water resistance, as these factors can greatly impact your overall comfort on the trails. By considering these factors, you’ll be well on your way to selecting the ideal trail running shoes for your outdoor excursions.

Fit : Make sure the shoe fits comfortably and securely. Try it on and walk around in it to ensure that it feels snug but not too tight
Cushioning : Check the shoe’s level of cushioning. Look for adequate support and shock absorption to provide comfort and protection during your trail runs
Traction : Assess the grip and traction of the outsole. Trail running requires shoes with sturdy treads that can handle different terrains and provide good traction
Durability : Examine the shoe’s construction and overall durability. Look for reinforced areas, strong materials, and quality craftsmanship to ensure it can withstand the demands of trail running
Breathability : Consider the shoe’s breathability to keep your feet cool and dry during your runs. Look for mesh or breathable panels that allow airflow while preventing moisture buildup
Stability : Look for a shoe that provides stability and support, especially if you have pronation issues. Features like arch support, a supportive midsole, and a secure fit can help maintain proper running form and reduce the risk of injuries
Protection : Check for features that provide additional protection on the trails, such as toe guards or rock plates, to shield your feet from potential hazards like roots, rocks, or debris
Weight : Consider the shoe’s weight. Trail running shoes should strike a balance between being lightweight for agility and heavy enough to provide a stable platform on uneven terrain
Reviews : Read customer reviews to gain insights into the shoe’s performance, comfort, and durability. Feedback from other runners can give you a better idea of whether the Saucony Excursion Tr15 is the right choice for you
Price : Lastly, consider your budget and the value you will be getting from the shoe. While quality trail running shoes may come with a higher price tag, it’s essential to find the right balance between quality and affordability

How to Spot the Warning Signs That the Saucony Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe Isn’t the Right Fit for You.

Inadequate fit : If the shoe feels too tight or too loose, it may not provide the necessary support and comfort for your feet. Ill-fitting shoes can lead to discomfort and increase the risk of injury
Lack of arch support : If you require additional arch support due to flat feet or other foot conditions, it’s important to choose a shoe that offers adequate support. Insufficient arch support may result in discomfort or pain during your runs
Incompatibility with your running style : Every runner has a unique running style, and different shoes are designed to accommodate different types of runners. If the Saucony Excursion Tr15 is not suited for your particular running style, you might experience discomfort or instability during your runs
Discomfort during trial runs : Trying on the shoes and going for a short run can be helpful in evaluating their comfort and performance. If you experience discomfort or pain during your trial runs, it’s a clear indication that the product might not be suitable for you

Frequently Asked Questions about Trail Running Shoes

How do i choose the right type of trail running shoes for different terrains.

When choosing the right type of trail running shoes for different terrains, there are a few factors to consider. Firstly, it’s important to know what type of terrain you will be running on. For more rugged and technical trails with uneven surfaces, you will need shoes with better traction and stability. Look for shoes with deeper lugs on the outsole and additional support features such as rock plates or toe guards.

If you’ll be running on more moderate and well-maintained trails, shoes with less aggressive lugs and lighter weight will work well. These shoes will provide comfort and responsiveness while still offering some traction.

Lastly, if you’ll be running on wet or slippery surfaces, you should consider choosing shoes with good water resistance or even waterproofing features to keep your feet dry.

It’s also worth noting that personal preferences play a role in choosing trail running shoes. Some runners prefer more cushioning for longer distances, while others prioritize a lighter weight for faster runs.

Overall, selecting the right trail running shoes for different terrains involves considering the type of trail you’ll be running on, the traction and stability offered by the shoes, as well as your personal preferences for comfort and performance.

Discover the perfect companion for your adventurous runs with the Saucony Men’s Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe – experience comfort, stability, and durability on the trails today!

9 thoughts on “ Saucony Excursion Tr15: The Ultimate Trail Running Shoe Review ”

I had some issues with the laces coming undone during my runs. It gets annoying having to stop and tie them again.

The cushioning is excellent and provides great support for my feet. No pain or discomfort during my runs.

Unfortunately, the shoe lacks waterproofing. In wet conditions, my feet end up soaked.

I found the fit to be a bit narrow and had to size up. Otherwise, the shoe is comfortable for long runs.

The durability of these shoes is impressive. They have held up well on rugged terrains.

The design of the shoe is attractive and stylish. I receive compliments on them often.

Great shoe! I love the traction and stability it provides on the trails. Highly recommend.

The price is reasonable for the quality and performance it delivers. Worth the investment for trail runners.

The shoe offers good breathability, keeping my feet cool even on hot trail runs.

Saucony Excursion TR11

The 11th update of the Saucony Excursion TR gets seriously mixed reviews from users. The moderately cushioned neutral trail shoe looks rugged enough for off-road wandering but falls short in many ways. Thankfully, it’s comfortable enough that you could wear it to walk the dog but as a trail shoe, it’s just not up to snuff. The TR11 features an updated upper design that’s definitely better at keeping out rocks and pebbles but falls short in terms of durability. A new midsole design features a better distribution of cushioning, but not everyone liked the new midsole configuration. The biggest issue with the newest Saucony Excursion? Durability. Time and time again reviewers were disappointed and frustrated by the shoe’s flimsy construction. This being the 11th iteration, it’s surprising that durability seems to have been given very little thought at all. Does the TR11 have any redeeming qualities? Read on.

Comfortable, soft cushioning
Stable design
Lightweight
Breathable
Nice aesthetic
Serious durability issues
Wide fit causes slippage
Poor traction on technical trails
Lack of arch support

Breathability

Responsiveness, flexibility, key features, bottom line, related posts:.

Training advice & race plans Weekly coaching office hours Deals from brands you love

Members receive ongoing support from certified coaches, race guides, videos, interviews with experts, and more Join for free today!

Rate this shoe and enter our monthly giveaway. Check the current giveawey right here

Submit your rating

Trail Running |

The Saucony trail running shoe range explained

We break down and the explain saucony's comprehensive trail running shoe range..

Saucony's trail running shoe range is extensive and includes models for terrains of all types. Here, we're taking a look at that comprehensive Saucony range, and checking out the technologies behind them.

The Saucony brand has been around for over a century. And for a long time it's been one of the big names in running. Its range of trail running shoes builds on decades of experience, resulting in superb options for runners of all types and levels.

Saucony Peregrine 13, Peregrine 13 ST and Peregrine 13 GTX

Weight: 260g (men's)/ 230g (women's) Drop: 4mm Lug depth: 5mm (13 and GTX, 6.5mm ST) Support: Neutral

This shoe is named after the fastest animal on Earth for a reason. Lightweight and yet fantastically comfortable, the Saucony Peregrine 13 is for blistering speedy trail runs.

Shaving even more weight off the already lightweight Peregrine 12, the Peregrine 13 helps deliver more speed than ever before in the range. Weighing just 260g for men and 230g for women (across an average size curve), this model is one of the lightest shoes in the pack.

This updated version of the classic Peregrine trail shoe has a redesigned lug pattern with deep 5mm lugs. And the Peregrine 13 ST (soft terrain) shoe provides the most aggressive grip of all the Saucony trail shoes at 6.5mm. It also features an in-built gaiter for added protection against debris. In short, there should be no amount of rugged terrain you can’t tackle.

Saucony Peregrine 13

Terrain: A versatile shoe for lightweight speed and versatility on variety of terrain; from forest paths, to grass, to rocky trails.

Technology & key features: PWRTRAC rubber outsole (grip), PWRRUN cushioning (midsole), a protective rock plate, and deep 5mm lugs for tackling mud.

Distance: Short- to middle-distance runs.

Feel of the shoe: A lightweight, nimble trail shoe with good grip and cushioning.

Saucony Peregrine 13 ST

Terrain: Designed specifically for providing the most grip in soft ground conditions.

Technology & key features: PWRTRAC rubber outsole (grip), PWRRUN cushioning (midsole), a protective rock plate, and aggressive 6.5mm lugs for tackling mud.

Feel of the shoe: Nimble and lightweight with an aggressive outsole.

Saucony Peregrine 13 GTX

Terrain: For the same terrain as the 13 but keeps feet dry in wet conditions.

Technology & key features: PWRTRAC rubber outsole (grip), PWRRUN cushioning (midsole), a protective rock plate, deep 5mm lugs for tackling mud, and invisible fit GORE-TEX upper material to keep your feet dry.

Feel of the shoe: Nimble and lightweight. The GORE-TEX upper doesn’t change the fit - choose your usual size.

Shop all Saucony Peregrine 13 trail shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Endorphin Trail and Endorphin Trail Mid

Weight: 275g (men's)/ 235g (women's) Drop: 4mm Lug depth: 4.5mm Support: Neutral

The Endorphin shoes feature revolutionary SPEEDROLL technology, which aims to propel you forward effortlessly towards that athletic edge, so you can run faster and not harder. Delivering an off-road running experience like no other. This lightweight, yet maximally cushioned, shoe is designed to carry you up, down, and over even the gnarliest of trails, taking speed to a whole new height.

Made to provide incredible spring and return from a thick bed of ultralight PWRRUN PB cushioning, the midsole used works to cushion the foot on impact, reducing the stress and strain your feet endure, which translates to reduced risk of injury as your feet are protected.

The midsole also works to provide a springy rebound, utilising the force from your last step to power you into your next one. The intended result is less energy loss and a reduced rate of fatigue, meaning you can go further and faster. A net mesh also covers the midsole area to protect it from the rugged terrain.

Saucony Endorphin Trail

Terrain: The propulsive shoe suited best to hard-packed trails .

Technology & key features: SPEEDROLL technology to allow you to roll over the trails, PWRRUN PB cushioning to give you a light and fast feel, and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole.

Feel of the shoe: Soft cushioning with SPEEDROLL technology aims to push you onto your toes and help propel you forwards.

Saucony Endorphin Trail Mid

Terrain: The protective shoe for the same terrain as the Endorphin Trail but with a more protective upper suited to dusty paths and gravel.

Technology & key features: SPEEDROLL technology to allow you to roll over the trails, PWRRUN PB cushioning to give you a light and fast feel, and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole. A mid-cut upper for a more protective fit.

Distance: Short to middle-distance runs.

Feel of the shoe: Soft cushioning with SPEEDROLL technology pushes you onto your toes and helps propel you forwards. The higher-fitting upper makes your feet feel more protected.

Shop all Saucony Endorphin Trail shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Endorphin Edge

Weight: 255g (men's)/ 221g (women's) Drop: 6mm Lug depth: 4mm Support: Neutral

Break boundaries and release your inner trail seeker with the Saucony Endorphin Edge - a shoe designed to be super-fast, lightweight and cushioned for next-level performance.

The Endorphin Edge is packed with PWRRUN PB foam cushioning and a Carbitex™ carbon-fibre plate that helps propel you forward. This flexible carbon-fibre plate should provide speed and efficiency, and despite featuring a high-stack cushioned midsole, you can still enjoy a close connection to the ground. Featuring 4mm lugs on the outsole for ample grip on rugged terrain.

With both higher absorption and faster evaporation, the lightweight mesh of the upper helps pull moisture away from your foot, which means you keep cool and stay dry.

In comparison to other models, it's the only one to feature a 3-quarter length plate carbon-fibre plate and is the lightest and fastest Saucony trail shoe in the range. It also has a higher drop (6mm) than the Peregrine 12 and Endorphin Trail, which are both 4mm.

Terrain: The light and fast shoe for hard packed trails and forest paths – the kind of ground you can run fast on.

Technology & key features: Carbitex™ carbon-fibre plate to propel you up hills and along the trails, Speedroll technology to allow you to roll over the trails, PWRRUN PB cushioning to give you a light and fast feel and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole.

Feel of the shoe: Lightweight, fast and plenty of cushioning.

Shop all Saucony Endorphin Edge shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Xodus Ultra

Weight: 293g (men's)/ 259g (women's) Drop: 6mm Lug depth: 4.5mm Support: Neutral

For those who see the horizon and dare to explore further, meet the Saucony Xodus Ultra. Built for long trails, this shoe is made to go the distance.

Specifically designed for the long-haul, the Xodus Ultra aims to provides the ultra-comfort you desire for the ultra-distance you demand. Featuring a new design that’s been formulated to give you more room and more comfort as you take on extra miles. Get maximum spring with ultralight and ultra-plush PWRRUN PB cushioning and added durability and support, with a resilient PWRRUN Frame to help revive your stride and a stable feeling.

This shoe aims to provide maximum energy return and has a redesigned 3-piece PWRTRAC outsole for traction on off-road terrain. This shoe has a 6mm drop and 4.5mm lugs for superb grip.

Enjoy more comfort with a roomier toe box and a contoured sockliner which hugs your foot for a perfect fit. a more minimal upper should decrease irritation hotspots and a new debris shield keep out mud and loose stones. It also features a rock-plate in the midsole for added protection against sharp rocks underfoot.

Terrain: A cushioned shoe for covering a variety of terrain over a long period of time.

Technology & key features: A max cushioned trail shoe without any extra weight. PWRRUN PB cushioning combines with a durable PWRRUN Frame to help revive your stride and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole. Durable protection with an improved rock plate.

Distance: Ideal for long runs and ultra-distances.

Feel of the shoe: Soft, ultra-plush cushioning, with a roomy toe box allows your feet to spread.

Shop all Saucony Xodus Ultra shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Ride 15 TR and Ride 15 GTX

Weight: 261g (men's)/ 241g (women's) Drop: 8mm Lug depth: 3.5mm Support: Neutral

Built using softer cushioning and grippy tread, the Saucony Ride 15 TR road to trail shoe has more foam, a durable feel, and everything you need to go further.

The Ride 15 TR has a PWRTRAC outsole and lightweight and durable upper, with a FORMFIT design and supportive webbing, which aims to hug your foot to provide a more personalised feel.

The soft PWRRUN cushioning formula gives you more cushion and less weight for springy trail and road runs. A higher stack and a PWRRUN+ sockliner give you an extra layer of cushioning to help deliver an easy stride from heel-to-toe.

Like the Excursion TR16, this shoe has the highest drop of any Saucony trail shoe at 8mm, which means it's more suitable for heel strikers.

Saucony Ride 15 TR

Terrain: The road to trail shoe suited for mixing road and trail in one run.

Technology & key features: PWRRUN cushioning for comfortable road miles coupled with a PWRTRAC grippy tread for light trails. A FORMFIT design for a more personalised fit.

Feel of the shoe: Feels like a road running shoe with extra grip.

Saucony Ride 15 TR GTX

Terrain: The waterproof shoe for the same road to trail terrain as the Saucony Ride 15 TR but with a Gore-Tex upper.

Technology & key features: PWRRUN cushioning for comfortable road miles coupled with a PWRTRAC grippy tread for light trails and an invisible fit GORE-TEX upper to keep your feet dry when mixing road and trail.

Feel of the shoe: Feels like a road running shoe with extra grip. The GORE-TEX upper doesn’t change the fit - choose your usual size.

Shop all Saucony Ride 15 TR shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Excursion TR16 GTX

Weight: 286g (men's)/ 241g (women's) Drop: 8mm Lug depth: 4.5mm Support: Neutral

The springy, comfortable Excursion TR16 GTX trail shoes are designed for all-round performance on the trails and are made to be suitable for both walking and trail running. Featuring GORE-TEX membrane in the upper material which provides protection against, rain, mud and moisture, meaning you remain comfortable and dry in all-weather conditions.

This shoe has a thick and responsive Versarun midsole which gives long-lasting, high performing cushioning, for protection and comfort to last a long day on the trail. This cushioning offers a soft landing with every step, absorbing heavy impacts but also dispersing energy evenly for a smoother ride.

The durable outsole features an XT-900 carbon rubber for outstanding performance and grip, with 4.5mm carbon-rubber lugs to provide the best traction. Whether you are clambering through muddy terrain or grassy grounds, you should feel unstoppable.

Like the Saucony Ride 15 TR GTX, this shoe has an 8mm drop, which is the highest heel-to-toe offset in the Saucony Trail Collection.

Terrain: The all-rounder trail shoe for a mixture of walking and running on grass and light trails with a GORE-TEX upper to keep your feet dry.

Technology & key features: Featuring VERSARUN Cushioning and GORE-TEX upper to keep your feet dry from your morning walk to your trail run.

Distance: Short walks and runs.

Feel of the shoe: Comfortable cushioning and a rugged outsole.

Shop all Saucony Excursion TR16 GTX shoes on SportsShoes here

Header image credit: SportsShoes

This article was originally published on SportsShoes.com

For all the latest news, tips and gear reviews, sign up to the Trail Running Newsletter .

Free Shipping* & Free Returns

ACCOUNT SIGN IN

Discover the perfect shoe in less than a minute with our shoe finder! Find your perfect fit

Did you mean?

Your recent searches, popular searches.

Click offer codes below to apply in checkout . Tap offer codes below to apply in checkout .

There are no promotions running at this time. There are no promotions running at this time.

Like being first?

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Get a $20 eGift card when you refer a friend to Saucony.com and they make a qualifying purchase. Your friend will receive a $20 promo code to use on their first purchase of $100+ at Saucony.com. Please read all terms and conditions. Not valid on Endorphin Collection, prior purchases or in Saucony outlet stores. Offer valid on US orders only. Some restrictions may apply.

Refer A Friend Give $20,

Your browser's Javascript functionality is turned off. Please turn it on so that you can experience the full capabilities of this site.

Discontinued
Excursion TR9 (S25249-13)

Excursion TR9

Alternate Views

Black | Orange

No Longer Available

This item is no longer available. but the road doesn't end here..

Check out our other top styles, to help you #RunYourWorld

A new weld through the midfoot provides lightweight lockdown
New outsole configuration provides durability and traction
Durable mesh keeps dirt and debris away from your foot
Shoe Category: Neutral, Trail
Pronation: Neutral
Water Resistant: No
Waterproof: No
Heel Stack Height: 26mm
Forefoot Stack Height: 18mm
Weight: 10.9 oz. | 310 g.

LIKE BEING FIRST?

Connect with us:

Visit saucony on facebook. Opens in new window.

Visit saucony on linkedin. Opens in new window.

Visit saucony on instagram. Opens in new window.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Saucony Privacy Policy

15% Off Your Next Purchase Over $75: Not valid on collaborations, prior purchases or in Saucony outlet stores. Valid only on Saucony.com. Exclusions may apply.

The original running brand

1898 is where it all began. Since then, Saucony has rightfully taken its place as one of the world's leading running companies. Built on a legacy of performance, Saucony continues to offer best-in-class running shoes, running apparel, and timeless retro footwear that has helped shape who we are today. The next great innovation has always been right at our fingertips—from speed shoes to trail running shoes and walking shoes to casual classics. Get exclusive access to new arrivals, top sellers, sales, extended sizes, and online-only offers.

Shoes Fulcrum

“As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.” I may receive a small commission (at no cost to you) if you purchase something through the links provided on this website. Read more …

Saucony Excursion VS Cohesion: Major Differences Explained

Running is a widely enjoyed way of staying fit that provides many advantages for your health. Whether you’re a devoted runner or just beginning your fitness adventure, having the appropriate pair of running sneakers is essential for top-notch performance and comfort.

Saucony, a renowned brand in the running shoe industry, offers a wide range of models to cater to different needs.

Running shoes also play a vital role in providing comfort, support, and stability during your runs. The wrong pair can lead to discomfort, pain, and even long-term foot issues . Therefore, it is crucial to carefully evaluate different options and understand their unique characteristics before making a purchase.

In this article, I will compare the Saucony Excursion and Cohesion models to provide you with guidance on choosing the right running shoe based on your running style, foot type, and running conditions.

So let’s dive into the details and find the perfect fit for your running journey .

Table of Contents

Overview And History Of Saucony Excursion And Cohesion

Overview of the saucony excursion model and saucony cohesion model.

The Saucony Excursion and Cohesion are two popular running shoe models offered by Saucony, a renowned brand known for its quality footwear.

Both shoe designs aim to offer runners a comfortable and supportive experience , yet they possess unique characteristics that address various requirements.

Saucony Excursion

The Saucony Excursion is recognized for its sturdiness and toughness, making it a great option for trail running and exploring off-road adventures.

It offers reliable traction and stability, thanks to its aggressive outsole and sturdy construction. The Excursion model is built to withstand various terrains, including uneven surfaces, gravel, and mud.

Saucony Cohesion

On the other hand, the Saucony Cohesion is designed with versatility and everyday comfort in mind.

It offers a balance of cushioning and responsiveness, making it suitable for both casual runners and those seeking lightweight options for their regular workouts .

The Cohesion model provides a smooth and comfortable ride on paved surfaces, such as roads and tracks .

History And Evolution Of The Excursion Line And Cohesion Line

The Saucony Excursion and Cohesion lines have a rich history of catering to different running preferences.

Excursion Line

The Excursion line was first introduced to the market with a focus on outdoor enthusiasts and trail runners .

Over the years, Saucony has diligently worked on enhancing the Excursion model, incorporating innovative technologies and top-notch materials to elevate its performance and extend its durability.

Cohesion line

Similarly, the Cohesion line was developed to provide runners with a versatile and affordable option for their daily training sessions.

Saucony recognized the need for a reliable running shoe that offers decent cushioning and support without breaking the bank. As a result, the Cohesion model has become a popular choice for beginners and budget-conscious runners.

Now that we have familiarized ourselves with the background information, let’s see the detailed comparison of the Saucony Excursion and Cohesion running shoe models .

Also, Check Out : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine: Best Trail Running Shoe?

Major Differences : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

To make your decision-making process more enjoyable and easier, I’ve prepared an exciting comparison table that showcases the distinctive features and highlights the key differences between Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion.

Design And Construction : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

When it comes to design and construction, both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion have unique features that cater to different running preferences.

Let’s compare them side by side:

Upper Construction And Materials

The upper of a running shoe plays a crucial role in providing a secure and comfortable fit.

Saucony Excursion

The Saucony Excursion features a durable synthetic mesh uppe r that offers breathability and protection against trail debris.

It is designed to withstand the rigors of off- road running , with overlays and reinforced toe caps for added durability.

On the other hand, the Saucony Cohesion utilizes a combination of mesh and synthetic materials for its upper construction.

It provides a lightweight and breathable feel , ideal for everyday training and shorter-distance runs.

The Cohesion model also incorporates supportive overlays to enhance stability and structure.

Overall, both models offer adequate breathability and support, but in my experience, Excursion excels in providing additional durability and protection for rugged terrains.

Midsole Cushioning And Support Features

The midsole of a running shoe is responsible for cushioning and shock absorption.

In the Saucony Excursion, you’ll find a plush midsole with a generous amount of cushioning.

It utilizes Saucony’s GRID technology, which offers excellent impact absorption and energy return.

This makes the Excursion ideal for longer runs and provides a comfortable ride on uneven surfaces .

Similarly, the Saucony Cohesion incorporates a responsive midsole that provides a good balance of cushioning and support.

It features the VERSAFOAM technology, which offers a cushioned and responsive feel, ensuring a smooth and comfortable running experience.

The Cohesion model is suitable for both short and long-distance runs, providing adequate cushioning for everyday training.

In terms of cushioning, both models excel in their respective categories .

The Excursion offers a plush and protective feel, while the Cohesion strikes a balance between cushioning and responsiveness.

Outsole Design And Traction Capabilities

The outsole is essential for providing traction and grip on various surfaces.

The Saucony Excursion boasts a rugged outsole design with aggressive lugs, specifically engineered for off-road running.

The multidirectional lugs provide excellent traction on trails, mud, and other challenging terrains .

This makes the Excursion a reliable choice for adventurous runners who enjoy exploring off-the-beaten-path routes.

In comparison, the Saucony Cohesion features a more versatile outsole design , suitable for road and track running.

It incorporates durable rubber with strategic flex grooves, allowing for a smooth and natural stride on paved surfaces.

While it may not offer the same level of traction as the Excursion on rugged terrains, it provides sufficient grip for everyday road running.

Also Check Out : Saucony Wide VS Regular: Choose The Right Fit For Your Feet

Fit And Comfort : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Selecting the perfect running shoe involves prioritizing the right fit and ultimate comfort.

To provide you with a clear understanding, let’s compare the fit characteristics and comfort features of the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion side by side:

Fit Characteristics And Considerations

The Saucony Excursion is known for its roomy fit, providing ample space for the toes to splay naturally.

This design feature is especially beneficial for runners with wider feet or those who prefer a more relaxed fit.

The Excursion’s generous fit allows for added comfort during long-distance runs, as it minimizes the likelihood of discomfort or blisters caused by rubbing or constriction.

On the other hand, the Saucony Cohesion offers a more standard or medium fit , accommodating a broader range of foot shapes and sizes.

It strikes a balance between a snug fit and sufficient room in the toe box for natural movement.

This fit characteristic is suitable for runners who prefer a secure and supportive fit without feeling overly tight.

Comfort Features And Technologies

Both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion incorporate comfort features and technologies to enhance the overall running experience:

The Excursion model utilizes a plush padded collar and tongue, providing cushioning and preventing discomfort from pressure points.

This feature adds a layer of comfort around the ankle and instep .

The Cohesion model features a similar padded collar and tongue design , ensuring a snug and comfortable fit.

It also incorporates breathable mesh lining, promoting airflow and reducing moisture build-up, which can contribute to a more comfortable running experience.

Both models incorporate removable cushioned insoles, allowing for customization and the option to insert orthotics if necessary. This feature enhances comfort and support, especially for runners with specific foot conditions or requirements.

Saucony’s Advanced Cushioning Technologies

Saucony’s advanced cushioning technologies, such as GRID (in the Excursion) and VERSAFOAM (in the Cohesion ), contribute to shock absorption and provide a responsive and cushioned feel. These technologies help minimize impact forces during running, reducing discomfort and fatigue .

Additionally, both models have a lightweight design , reducing overall strain and allowing for a more effortless and comfortable running experience.

Overall, the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion prioritize fit and comfort, with the Excursion offering a roomier fit and the Cohesion providing a more standard fit.

Both models incorporate comfort features and technologies to enhance the running experience, such as padded collars, cushioned insoles, and advanced cushioning technologies.

Performance And Functionality : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

When it comes to performance and functionality, both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion offer unique features that suit various types of terrains and running conditions.

Performance In Different Terrains And Conditions

The Saucony Excursion is specifically designed for off-road running and performs exceptionally well on trails, gravel paths, and uneven terrains .

Its rugged outsole with aggressive lugs provides superior traction, ensuring a secure grip on various surfaces.

The Excursion’s sturdy construction and protective features make it an ideal choice for trail enthusiasts and those who enjoy off-road adventures.

In contrast, the Saucony Cohesion is more suited for road running and everyday training on paved surfaces.

It offers reliable performance and responsiveness on roads, tracks, and smoother terrains.

While it may not have the same level of traction as the Excursion, the Cohesion’s outsole design still provides sufficient grip for typical road running conditions.

Important Point

Choosing between Excursion and Cohesion depends on your preferred running environment.

If you frequently run on trails or uneven terrains, the Excursion’s specialized features will enhance your performance.
On the other hand, if your runs primarily take place on roads or tracks, the Cohesion’s versatility and responsiveness will serve you well.

Stability And Support For Trail Running And Road Running

The Saucony Excursion offers excellent stability and support for trail running.

Its durable construction and robust overlays provide enhanced stability, keeping your feet secure and protected on uneven surfaces.

The Excursion’s midsole cushioning, combined with the rugged outsole, delivers a balanced and stable ride, reducing the risk of ankle rolls and providing confidence on challenging trails.

Similarly, the Saucony Cohesion prioritizes stability and support for road running .

Its midsole cushioning system and supportive overlays ensure a stable and secure fit during each stride.

The Cohesion’s design helps promote proper foot alignment, reducing the risk of overpronation or supination a nd minimizing the potential for injuries.

Whether you need stability and support for trail or road running, both the Excursion and Cohesion models actively meet your requirements.”.

I would advise Considering your running style, gait, and any specific support requirements when choosing between the two.

Durability And Long-Lasting Performance

When it comes to durability, both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion are built to withstand the rigors of regular running.

The Excursion’s robust construction, reinforced toe caps, and durable upper materials ensure longevity, even in demanding trail conditions.

It is designed to endure the elements and maintain its performance over time.

The Saucony Cohesion also exhibits impressive durability, with its sturdy construction and reliable materials .

While primarily intended for road running, the Cohesion’s durability allows for consistent performance during training sessions and daily runs.

It’s important to note that the lifespan of running shoes can vary depending on usage, terrain, and individual running mechanics.
Regularly monitoring the condition of your shoes and replacing them when signs of wear and tear become noticeable is crucial for maintaining optimal performance and preventing injuries.

Weight And Flexibility : Saucony Excursion Vs Saucony Cohesion

Let’s compare the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion side by side in terms of weight, flexibility, and their impact on your natural foot movement.

Weight Comparison

The weight of running shoes can significantly affect your running experience.

The Saucony Excursion is generally slightly heavier than the Saucony Cohesion.

The Excursion’s additional weight can be attributed to its robust construction and trail-specific features.

Flexibility Assessment

Flexibility is an important factor to consider as it directly impacts your foot’s natural movement and overall comfort during running.

Both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion offer a balance of flexibility and support but with slight variations.

The Saucony Excursion strikes a balance between flexibility and stability , allowing for a smooth transition during trail runs.

Its flexible midsole promotes natural foot movement, adapting to uneven terrain and providing a responsive feel.

The Excursion’s flexibility allows your foot to flex and adapt to changing surfaces, enhancing your agility and maneuverability on trails.

Similarly, the Saucony Cohesion offers a good level of flexibility, but with a focus on maintaining stability for road running.

The midsole of the shoe is created to offer a combination of softness and energy return, guaranteeing a pleasant and effective way of walking or running.

The Cohesion’s flexibility promotes a natural gait cycle, allowing your foot to move freely without compromising on support.

Impact On Performance And Fatigue Levels

The weight and flexibility of running shoes can significantly impact your overall performance and fatigue levels.

Here’s how they influence your running experience :

Performance

The weight of a running shoe can affect your running efficiency and speed.

Lighter shoes like the Saucony Cohesion are often favored by runners aiming for faster paces or races.

However, the slightly heavier weight of the Saucony Excursion can provide added stability and support, which is beneficial for trail running, especially on rugged terrains.

Fatigue Levels

The flexibility of running shoes plays a role in reducing fatigue levels .

Shoes with appropriate flexibility enable your foot to move naturally and absorb shock efficiently, reducing strain on your joints and muscles.

Both the Excursion and Cohesion offer a level of flexibility that promotes a comfortable and energy-efficient running experience.

If you prioritize trail running and need extra stability and protection, the Excursion’s slightly heavier weight and flexibility will suit your needs.
On the other hand, if you prefer road running and prioritize a lighter shoe for speed and agility, the Cohesion’s weight and flexibility make it a suitable choice.

Breathability : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

When choosing running shoes, it’s important to think about how well they allow air to circulate. This is vital because it directly affects how comfortable your feet will be and the overall health of your feet during your runs.

Let’s compare the breathability features of the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion.

The Excursion’s breathability features are often more pronounced due to its focus on trail running.

Trail running often involves more challenging and unpredictable terrains, which can increase the intensity of your runs and potentially lead to higher foot temperatures.

To counteract this, the Excursion’s breathability features are often designed to provide enhanced ventilation and heat dissipation, ensuring your feet stay cool and comfortable during your off-road adventures.

On the other hand, the Cohesion’s breathability features are optimized for road running conditions .

While it still offers effective breathability, its focus is on providing a comfortable and well-ventilated environment for your feet during regular road runs and training sessions.

Based on my experience, I can confidently say that the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion provide exceptional breathability. Their well-designed upper constructions and the utilization of breathable mesh materials actively contribute to their extraordinary breathability.

Waterproofing : Saucony Excursion vs Saucony Cohesion

When choosing running shoes, it’s crucial to think about the ability to resist water , which is an essential factor, particularly if you frequently run in damp or rainy weather.

Saucony Excursion Waterproofing

The Saucony Excursion is designed to be more resilient to water and offers enhanced protection against wet conditions.

The Excursion incorporates certain features to keep your feet dry during your trail runs.

The upper of the Excursion often utilizes water-resistant materials and construction techniques to provide a degree of protection against light moisture. It can fend off light rain, dew, and splashes encountered on the trail.

Additionally, the Excursion has sealed seams or a gusseted tongue design that helps prevent water from seeping into the shoe through vulnerable areas. These features add an extra layer of protection and help keep your feet drier during your trail adventures.

Important Note :

It’s crucial to keep in mind that the Excursion is not completely waterproof like dedicated hiking boots and might not endure extended periods of heavy rain or crossing through deep water.

Saucony Cohesion Waterproofing

The Saucony Cohesion, being more geared towards road running and general training, does not prioritize waterproofing to the same extent as the Excursion.

The upper of the Cohesion is typically made of breathable mesh materials that are not inherently waterproof.

However, they do provide a certain degree of water resistance, which means the shoe can withstand light moisture such as drizzles or wet surfaces encountered during road runs.

It’s important to note that the water resistance of the Cohesion is limited and may not hold up well against heavy rainfall or extensive exposure to water. The shoe is not designed to keep your feet completely dry in such conditions.

It is not designed specifically to be waterproof but offers some level of water resistance to protect your feet in mildly wet conditions.

Pros And Cons : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Both shoes have the following Pros and Cons.

Conclusion

After a detailed comparison of Saucony Excursion vs Cohesion , I hope now you will be much more familiar with the differences between both shoes.

However, both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion offer their own strengths and considerations when it comes to key factors such as breathability, fit and comfort, performance and functionality, weight and flexibility, and waterproofing.

The Excursion excels in providing durability, traction, and support for trail running, while the Cohesion offers a lightweight design, comfortable cushioning, and versatile usage for road running.

Whether you prioritize off-road adventures or regular road runs, both models deliver reliable performance.

In the end, I would like to say consider your terrain, running style, and desired features to make an informed decision for your running journey.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can i use the saucony excursion for road running.

Even though the main focus of the Saucony Excursion is trail running, it is also suitable for running on roads. However, keep in mind that its rugged outsole and sturdy construction may feel less responsive on paved surfaces compared to the Saucony Cohesion, which is specifically designed for road running.

Are the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion suitable for long-distance running?

Both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion can handle long-distance running. However, the choice depends on your preferences and the terrain. The Excursion’s durability, traction, and stability make it a great option for long trail runs, while the Cohesion’s lightweight design and cushioning are well-suited for road running over longer distances.

Do these shoes provide arch support?

The Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion offer moderate arch support. However, for individuals with specific arch support needs, it is recommended to try the shoes and assess their compatibility with your foot structure or consider adding custom orthotic inserts for personalized support.

Are these shoes suitable for people with wide feet?

Both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion come in various width options, including wide widths. This ensures a more accommodating fit for individuals with wider feet. It’s advisable to check the specific width availability and try the shoes on to determine the best fit for your foot shape.

Are the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion suitable for beginners?

Yes, both the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion are suitable for beginners. They provide a nice blend of coziness, padding, and assistance, which are crucial for beginners in the running world.

About Author :

Hammad Qadir is a passionate fashion blogger with a passion for shoes, spanning over seven years. As the driving force behind “ShoesFulcrum.com” he offers unparalleled insights into iconic brands like Crocs, Hey Dude, and Birkenstock. With a collection of a hundred pairs, his expertise extends to industry giants like Nike and Adidas. Through insightful reviews and recommendations, Hammad guides readers to their perfect pair. Hammad’s knack for differentiating between brands and guiding readers makes him a trusted authority. Active on Quora, Reddit, Medium, LinkedIn, and Pinterest, he fosters engagement and shares exclusive content. Read more. ..

Hey Dude VS Allbirds: Which Brand Is Better? (2023)

New Balance Vs ASICS: Which Brand Is Better? (2023)

Wednesday, October 19, 2022

Saucony ride 15 tr multi tester review with 9 comparisons.

Article by Mike Postaksi, Renee Krusemark, Adam Glueck, Jeff Valliere, John Tribbia, Jeff Beck with Sam Winebaum

Saucony Ride 15 TR ($140, $160 GTX)

Introduction

Very high stack to weight ratio Mike P/Sam/Adam/Jeff V/John/Jeff B

Solid traction on light trails, loose sand, gravel Mike P/Renee/Adam/Jeff V/John/Jeff B

PWRRUN slab is pleasantly soft, yet not mushy Mike P/Sam/Renee/Adam/Jeff V/John

Excellent on the road if the outsole is noticed up front, reminding of front outsole pop and response of Ride 13 (road): Sam/Adam/Jeff B

Road to trail versatility within a single run: Adam/Jeff V/John/Jeff B

A bit narrow in the toebox for a trail shoe Mike P/Adam/Jeff B/Jeff V

High stack & soft foam makes them a bit unstable on “real” trails Mike P/Jeff V/John

Unstable in steeper terrain, especially downhills Mike P/Renee/Jeff V/John

Highish price for pure trail use given its capabilities, but door to trail usage increases value/versatility Mike P

Outsole up front is quite stiff and not as well segmented as it could be for road uses Sam

Official Weight: men's 9.2 oz / 261 g (US9) / women's 8.5 oz / 241 g (US8)

Samples: men’s 9.12 oz / 258g (US8.5), 9.6 oz / 272 g (US10), women’s 8.36 oz / 237 g (US8)

Stack Height: 35 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot, 8mm drop

Available now. $140, $160 GTX

[Saucony’s all-encompassing 2022 trail lineup]

Mike P: I received the Ride 15 TR out of the blue from Saucony. It was not on my radar at all, and I didn’t know anything about them. Glancing at the spec sheet - nothing really jumped off the page. With the shoe being a modified “TRail” version of an established road shoe, I was expecting something of a generic trail shoe for the masses.

Out of the box - first impression is that the toe box is quite narrow, especially for a trail shoe. I received a size 10 - same as I have in the Xodus Ultra. The Ride TR is quite narrow in comparison, with a touch less width across the forefoot, but tapering more sharply towards the toes. I have at least 1 full thumbs width up front, but due to the narrowness, I’m glad I received a 10 rather than a 9.5. In fact, on my first run, I discovered that I had to reduce lace tension up front in order to reduce uncomfortable pressure.

[I’ve loosened the strap here to show that the midfoot lace strap is functional]

Aside from the narrowness up front, it’s a well fitting upper - quite secure through the midfoot with good heel hold. I like the lace strap that is routed through the upper material - it’s effective at dialing in midfoot security. The additional room in front of the toes was not a bother as the Ride TR is not meant for technical trails where unexpectedly kicking obstacles could be an issue. The tongue is well padded, high enough, and doesn’t slide around. Saucony again uses a clever design by using a thicker piece of material for the front pull tab - directly below the area where the lace knot sits.

[No lace knot pressure - they sit nicely on top of those logo’ed tabs at the top of the tongue]

As far as fit, I found it similar to the other 2022 Saucony trail shoes. The forefoot and toebox is not as lengthy or wide as the Xodus Ultra or Endorphin Edge, but I still found it roomy. For sizing, I typically wear a women’s size 8 in all Saucony shoes, but my true-to-size is between a 7.5 and an 8. Runners between half sizes who prefer a roomier fit might need the half size longer. The security is good for a road-to-trail shoe. The fit is not as secure as a technical trail shoe, but it’s a fair balance for what the shoe is meant for, which is light trail.

Sam: Purposeful a bit busy and conservative in visual design the intent seems to be to call out the more trail oriented features of the Ride 15 TR to contrast it with its road sibling.

We see dual supportive external webbing straps tied into the lacing at the 2nd eyelet as well as stout longitudinal overlay. They are effective.

We have a quite firm and thicker toe black bumper around the front debris mesh.

The foot is very well locked down but the non stretch mesh leads to a somewhat low feeling toe box due to the dense non stretch mesh and toe bumper more than actual height. OK by me for trail use and fine on road but contributing somewhat to the overall front stiffness of the shoe along with outsole. We have a gaiter ring up front . For sure I will be running them in winter on snow so that is handy.

Finally the contrasting red outsole and speckled and grid patterned midsole (same stack height as its road sibling at 35/27 for sure gives a trail vibe even though as far as I can tell the PWRRUN foam in both is identical.

The fit is true to size and the foot hold trails solid and needed given the high stack, softish foam and relatively narrow on the ground platform. Making no compromises on the upper was a smart move if for trail use and in comparison to the Ride 15 road this upper is clearly more substantial and secure but not quite as comfortable.

Adam: I’ve been running extensively in the Endorphin Edge, so was hoping this shoe would be a good training companion with more road to trail versatility. The upper isn’t incredibly stretchy, and it felt a bit narrow when I first put it on.

I didn’t notice this at all while running, and despite being a thicker upper than shoes like the Endorphin Edge, it feels significantly lighter and more breathable than a shoe like the Nike Pegasus 37. Like Mike, I also reduced the lace tension, and found a comfortable and controlled fit. When combined with the soft but still controlled PWRRUN foam, I found the step-in feel impressively comfy, planted, and smooth. For a trail shoe, it has a lot of the smooth energy return of a road shoe, but with workable grip for dry trails.

John : I was pretty excited to receive the Ride 15 TR because I’ve always had interest in the road models and this looks like a great crossover shoe. The upper is soft, supple and seemingly durable. In addition, I find that the Ride 15 TR fit is true to size on my average to slightly narrow foot, with enough room in the toe box for some end-of-day or late run swelling or for those with more slender feet who like a little toe splay. The foothold is secure, both in the heel and midfoot. It feels light on my foot and the midsole feels firm yet padded. I like the midsole feel in that it is firm enough to feel controlled but offers softness to be accommodating.

Jeff B: I missed out the latest Ride road model, but enjoyed the previous few models and was pleasantly surprised putting the 15TR on. For being a trail variant of a road shoe, I was definitely impressed by how solid the foothold is, and how robust the toe bumper is.

Unfortunately as a toebox snob they are a little tight in both directions, especially the expanded toe bumper section over my big toe, but that tight hold definitely gives a feel of security - far greater than your standard road-to-trail shoes give. Lengthwise they do fit true-to-size, though wider footed runners may want to look at going a half-size up to get a little more wiggle room for the toes.

While the upper is a touch busy as Sam notes, I really like the colorway, look and style. Fit is true to size and consistent with all other Sauconys I have worn, with a secure heel, well locked midfoot and a well held toe box.

The ceiling height in the toe box is a bit on the low side and the shape of the forefoot feels a bit tapered. On my usual daily runs of an hour or two, I found the toe box to be ideal for my somewhat narrow, low volume foot.

Just prior to writing this review however, I was out for a 4.5 hour hike/run on a 77 degree day with my wife and by the end of the day, my feet were feeling a little pinched. I was a bit surprised by this given my initial impressions of having ample room in the forefoot. While the Ride 15 TR is intended for door to trail and for sure not the steep and technical terrain that I frequent, I still had to take them there. Foothold is adequate for slower to moderate paces on technical terrain, be it rock hopping, steep downhills, sidehilling, etc….. I never felt as though my foot would break loose and affect stability or control, though if I try to push at all, I was mostly limited by the midsole and outsole.

Mike P: Initially I didn’t think too much about the midsole, being standard PWRRUN. But it is noted in the spec that it is a softer variety - which is clearly felt. It’s not as bouncy as their more advanced PWWRUN PB as in the Endorphin Edge and as a core in the Xodus Ultra, but it gives a nice cushy feeling without feeling mushy.

[Wouldn’t be my pick for long stretches on this type of terrain, but they’re manageable as long as you’re careful]

Re-checking the spec sheet, I noticed that the 35/27mm stack was quite generous given the shoe’s relatively low weight (9.6 oz - US 10). In fact, I couldn’t find a similarly stacked shoe in my quiver at such a low weight. The only close comp is Saucony’s own Endorphin Edge at 36/30 (9.2 oz - US 9.5). But that shoe is in quite a different class.

In addition to the generous PWRRUN stack, the Ride TR uses Saucony’s PWWRUN+ TPU insole to add even more cush to the equation. With such a big midsole stack, the TPU insole may not be entirely necessary, but in terms of sheer comfort - it’s a good match. Perhaps some stability is sacrificed, but swapping in a standard non-TPU insole may help if that’s an issue. Either way, there’s plenty of foam underfoot to keep your feet comfortable for long outings.

[TPU insole, same as found in Peregrine 12 and Xodus Ultra]

As Sam mentions in some of the comps below - the midsole depth is especially felt at the forefoot. As a midfoot/forefoot striker myself, I get no sense of bottoming out on forefoot landings. It feels like there’s quite a bit of cushion to spare, so they’ll likely maintain good cushion up front even as the foam compresses with greater usage.

Renee: Like Mike, I was not expecting the PWRRUN midsole to provide anything special. On my first run, the midsole felt much softer than I expected, and depending on the terrain, the bounce is fun. On rolling gravel roads, the softness is appreciated, although I did find the shoe slower than I would expect from the weight and drop. On trail, the bounce and high stack is fun for moderate declines, but a bit sketchy on steep downhills while dodging roots. The stack and midsole give all-day comfort and work well for anything from easy, short miles to 20+ milers.

Sam: The trend with all Saucony road and trail shoes in 2022, with the possible exception of the technical trails Peregrine 12, has been towards softer and lighter midsoles. As the others have said, we have a remarkably light (and substantial) road or trail weight of 9.12 oz / 258g in my US8.5 sample and a 35/27 stack height here given the upper and the lugged outsole .

The PWRRUN foam is indeed light and well cushioned with the shoe sufficiently stable for its intended varied uses. My early test run was mostly on road with a smattering of easy trails through forests and I would say this is the ideal terrain for the midsole and shoe, along with gravel and sandy roads and paths. There is plenty of cushion, solid support focused at the upper, and a lively rebound and flow although it is a bit firm and stiff up front due to the outsole design more than the foam above.

Adam: I was not expecting much from Saucony’s PWRRUN foam. I love the PWRRUN PB foam in the Endorphin Pro, Speed, and Edge, yet have found plain PWRRUN in shoes like the Kinvara 12 to be dull and firm. The softer variety used here impressed me though. It doesn’t have the same energetic rebound, as the Endorphin Edge, but gives a smooth, cushioned, yet efficient response that suits my trail running gate. I’ve been testing this shoe on a mix of paved bike paths, gravel fire roads, and light trail in California, and the support of the upper combined with the density of the midsole provides a cushioned yet not sloppy response. This is not a racing midsole, but it’s remarkably light and versatile as a road to trail shoe.

John : There isn’t much for me to add on top of the others’ comments above. I similarly have few complaints for comfort and security while running in cruisy terrain. Sam captures my sentiment.

This is not a shoe for technical running, even though the lightweight responsive feel calls me to that kind of terrain. I feel like the stack height and stability are not best for precise footing, but rather best for the rolling dirt roads or gravel trails and paths. Moreover, the density of PWRRUN foam is downright comfortable underfoot when cruising from road to trail. Like Adam mentions above, nothing is sloppy about the response and it has a really smooth transition.

Jeff B: As the resident heavy runner in this review I’d say the midsole is adequately soft - though my barometer is a little broken right now coming right off the Saucony Triumph 20 ( RTR Review ) and it’s new blend of all TPU PWRRUN+ (I didn’t give it a 10/10 score because I thought it was “pretty good”). While I rarely turn down a little extra squish, this blend of PWRRUN is plenty good for dirt trails or even some roads on the way to trails.

While there is more than enough soft cushion and protection here for full days or 100 milers, I think the narrowness of the upper will rule out that option for many. While the midsole is excellent for its intended purpose, I will note that it is a little too soft to offer much support or predictability in technical terrain, or at least trying to move fast in technical terrain. Due to the high stack and softness, I find them to be a bit tippy and unstable when things get rough, to the point where I have to back off the pace and be very deliberate.

Mike P: The PWRTRAC outsole covers all of the main wear areas. They didn’t go full coverage - in order to save weight, and also to maintain a bit of flexibility with so much midsole foam. With 3.5mm standard, chevron-shaped lugs, the outsole does the job that it’s intended to do. Traction is very good on path-type terrain, light trails, loose sand, crushed gravel, and moderate loose gravel.

Boise’s lower foothills the trails are mostly dry singletrack, often with sandy sections and also sections of loose, varied gravel. The grades and technicality of most of the trails would lend themselves to road shoe usage, were it not for the loose surface. I always wear trail shoes, as the flatter outsoles of road shoes tend to slide a bit on those dry, sandy, gravely surfaces. The Ride 15 TR, and especially its outsole, is the perfect match for this type of terrain. I get just that bit of traction I need, plus the benefit of a lighter, non-overbuilt road-type shoe.

Renee: The PWRTRAC outsole on all of Saucony’s trail shoes works great for me especially so as the lugs are spaced enough to avoid trapping gravel or mud. The lugs aren’t deep enough for off-trail traction, but they offer a fair balance for the road-to-trail usage. Because the midsole is soft and somewhat bouncy, the lug depth doesn’t offer the best traction on steep downhill with debris. Not a big deal though as this is not a technical trail shoe.

Sam: I did find that on road the outsole provided some firm response in the mix, reminding me in some ways of the similar response of the road Saucony Ride 13 but not of the Ride 15 with its more minimal outsole over now softer foam.

That said, I also found the outsole and this is somewhat rare for me with softer shoes and even trail shoes was a bit firm upfront (and to pressing the rubber is very firm indeed) and not as segmented as I would prefer despite the shoe’s relatively long flex for such a big stack shoe enabled by its deeper lateral flex groove.

I think including slightly softer front rubber or smaller size and more lugs (as in the Nike Pegasus Trail 4 a close competitor) might improve the pavement ride as after all this is a door to trail type shoe. These changes might also help with agility on trickier trails.

Come winter on snow I think this outsole will be near ideal and with the available GTX version a snow and sloppy conditions near ideal road and firmer snow trails shoe.

Adam: For the intended purpose of this shoe, I think that the upper is spot on. The segmentation in the sole gives it the flexibility to run beautifully on the road, but there’s enough grip that in the sandy, dry California soil, it provides superior grip to a road shoe. The rubber is noticeably firm, which should provide good durability, but the grip on both road and trail is less than the endorphin edge. This is one of my favorite outsole implementations for a road to trail shoe.

Jeff B: Saucony’s chevron lugs are as dependable as they are predictable, and that’s not a bad thing. The outsole is a little more segmented than the other two Saucony trail shoes I’ve reviewed this year (Endorphin Edge and Xodus Ultra) though I agree with Sam - a little more segmenting wouldn’t hurt. The traction is good on dry trails, and I was hoping to get some weather here in Denver and try them in wet stuff but still waiting on a storm to come through. As much as I’d appreciate just a little more depth to the lugs for greater traction, I think that’d diminish it’s road-to-trail versatility some, and it’s not like Saucony doesn’t already have a few shoes that fit that niche anyway.

Jeff V: As others have said, the outsole is very good for its intended purpose. If you compare to all trail shoes, traction is on the lower end, but if you look at the Ride 15 as a road shoe with a trail outsole, then it is very effective for door to trail, dirt roads, buffed out trails, etc…. The lugs, while not deep, are effectively shaped and have a sticky enough rubber compound for dry conditions. Grip on rocky slab is moderate and I would say trying to move quickly on steep, loose terrain, off trail is not recommended.

Mike P: The Ride TR’s ride really shines when in its element: flat to moderate grades, loose, sandy, gravelly terrain but terrain that is not too rocky or cambered. I tend to disagree with Renee here - for me, the ride felt quicker than I expected. I logged some pretty quick and efficient times on a bunch of my “easy” test runs. I found the generous and soft PWRRUN, plus the 8mm drop, really led to some quick and smooth turnover without worrying about any harshness underfoot.

[Exactly the terrain the TR excels in - light paths/trails where you need just a bit of traction]

The low weight is very noticeable in comparison to other similarly cushioned (high stack) trail shoes. Pretty much all trail shoes north of 30mm in the heel are clocking in around the mid 10 oz - 11 oz range for my US 9.5-10 size. The Ride 15 TR is a svelte 9.6 oz for a big 35/27mm stack. There’s really nothing out there right now with that type of weight/stack ratio outside of carbon plated racers (Tecton X, Endo Edge).

All that being said, the ride really works in the terrain described above, but beyond that - something has to give. I also noticed instability in steeper terrain as well as moderate/uneven terrain. I had a few unexpected ankle rolls when not being careful and stepping on rocks. The soft, high stack just can’t stand up to technical or uneven surfaces. You can get by if you’re careful, but that’s really not what the shoe is meant for.

The paved road ride is responsive and fast if a bit firm and stiff at ground contact due to the big rubber outsole. Yes, you will feel it is a trail shoe at that point but you might as I did appreciate the quick fast response unlike the softer almost mushy in comparison response of the road Ride.

As such I see it as a great ride for longer tempo runs on varied surfaces: gravel, dirt, snow, pavement, even some mud along the way. As a “pure” trail runner it can be a great ride for smoother Western machine built single tracks.

Adam: This shoe is clearly targeted for the door to trail side, and I feel that it would be weak in technical singletrack, steep ascents and descents, and unstable terrain. However, the California terrain I’ve been testing this shoe on has been perfect for it.

John : The Ride 15 TR transition from heel-to-toe is very smooth and I found the rebound to feel lively on lift-off at moderate cadences. No doubt, this shoe is built for the mellow to moderate paces and would excel at long distance cruises through mostly smooth terrain. To my surprise, and adding on to Adam’s observation about stability, I found the ride to be quite stable on downhill, which allowed me to take a few aggressive stretches of downhill.

Jeff B: I’m with Mike here - it’s a fantastic road-to-trail runner for pretty mild trails. The forefoot hold might encourage me to get a little more technical than my latest two trail shoes (the buffed out trail cruisers Altra Olympus 5 and Topo Ultraventure 3) but ultimately that’s not this shoe’s forte. I didn’t find it nearly as fun as my colleagues, but between my extra size and logging so many Triumph 20 miles of late, I think that’s more a reflection of me than them.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Sam: My first thought in concluding, what a great value! $140 for a shoe that unless you want a speed oriented or super plush road shoe or a technical trails shoe handles everything in between well. And in the GTX version it should be a near ideal option for winter’s messy roads of all kinds.

The weight to cushion ratio given the big outsole and rugged upper are excellent. The new PWRRUN foam is soft enough and energetic despite not being supercritical and the outsole will grip just about anything.

My only real qualm is the front outsole design and its effect on firm terrain ride. In comparison to competitors such as Fuji Lite 2 and Pegasus Trail 4, the front outsole is firmer and stiffer affecting the feel of the forefoot despite the big stack and plentiful soft cushion. To start, it could use some more very front toe off flex which, while it might cause more mud to gather, less spacing between lugs and more “small windows” to the midsole as say the Pegasus Trail 4 have could help soften and flex the outsole without losing stability. Currently it mimics other Saucony outsole designs and here, with the big stack and big outsole a more door to trail specific design might improve the front feel and the shoe’s agility.

Sam's Score: 9.18 / 10

Ride 9.2 Fit 9.2 Value 9.4 Style: 9 Traction: 9 Rock Protection: 9.2

Mike P: It’s been said plenty enough already, but Saucony Trail 2022 has been on fire. Each of the shoes in its lineup serves a distinct purpose, and serves it well.

The Ride 15 TR slots in on the easier side of the “trail” spectrum, but let’s be honest - most of us including myself aren’t training up in the mountains each and every run. There’s plenty of easy mileage to be had, and the Ride 15 TR is well positioned to eat up those miles. I urge you to take a look at your trail quiver, and also think realistically about where you log the most miles. You may be like me, hitting the trails a lot of days with a bit more shoe than you actually need. WIth the off season coming up, followed by base-building early in 2023, I’m looking forward to logging plenty of miles in the Ride 15 TR.

Mike P’s Score: 9.3 / 10

Scoring Context - road to trail, paths, light trails usage

Ride: 10 - Smooth, fast, and efficient - love it for my easy trails mileage

Fit: 8 - Would prefer a bit less taper up front, but it’s a 10 if you have a narrower foot

Value: 9 - Limited trails range, but if you stick to what it’s designed for - great value

Style: 10 - Love the look, especially the paint splattered midsole, great for casual use too

Traction: 10 - Perfect for door to trail, light trails usage

Rock Protection: 10 - 35/27mm eats up light trails, gravel, small rocks

Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊

Renee’s score: 9.25/10 (-.25 terrain specific usage, .-50 runs a bit slow for its light weight/stack ratio)

Adam’s Score: 9.4 / 10

Scoring Context- Bay Area, light singletrack, bike paths (mix of paved and unpaved), gravel fire roads

Fit: 9 - Definitely on the narrower side, with a less stretchy upper material, but no blister issues, super comfortable when running, and good support considering the stack height

Value: 9 - For a trail shoe or road shoe alone, I think this shoe is ok value, but given that it’s well enough tuned, it’s could cover almost all my runs, and is great for the days where I’m running out the door from home or doing a mix of both.

Style: 9- Although I love Saucony’s crazy colorways, this is simple and understated, yet quite handsome. I’d still love pink or campfire orange, but it’s a good looking shoe

Traction: 10 - Perfect for door to trail, well optimized for both pavement and light trail. I can’t comment on wet traction since I have not had any wet test conditions so far.

Rock Protection: 10 - 35/27mm for light trails and gravel, it handles the type of rocks you’d take it on.

John’s Score: 9.1 /10

Ride: 9 (super comfortable shoe responsive ride)

Fit: 10 (comfortable out of the box for my slightly narrow foot)

Value: 9 (great shoe for the casual trail runner needing multi-purpose use)

Traction: 8 (does well on dry, mellow terrain)

Rock Protection: 9

Jeff B: One of the best road-to-trail versatility shoes that used to mean borderline minimal - though with so many trail shoes getting so much more cushioned it left me just a bit underwhelmed underfoot. Without a rock plate or that much underfoot the rock protection felt pretty minimal for me - but this isn’t the shoe meant for extremely technical terrain anyway. My biggest gripe is the cramped toebox, especially since Saucony got the toebox very right with several of their other trail shoes this year. I’m especially impressed with the upper, and how well it holds the foot considering it’s road shoe origins.

Jeff B’s Score: 7.9/10

Ride: 8 Fit: 7 Value: 10 Style: 10 Traction: 8 Rock Protection: 7

9 Comparisons

Index to all RTR reviews: HERE

Saucony Ride 15 ( RTR Review )

Sam: The midsole foams feel the same and the stack heights are identical or close to at

the same 35/27. I felt the Ride 15 road lacked some front response with its now softer foam and quite minimal outsole, the TR has plenty on trail and road but the outsole feels stiff and a bit hard in the mix on pavement whereas the regular is all smooth softness. That said the TR is a far better trail shoe that is also very capable on road.

The uppers feel like the same last but are made of very different materials. The TR is a moderately pliable dense debris mesh with 2 webbing straps per side running through stout overlays whereas the Ride’s single webbing strap essentially runs through the very soft very pliable mesh upper to the midsole. The “extras” of additional rubber and stouter upper in the TR add about 0.7 oz / 20g to its weight.

Between upper and outsole designs and despite the same stack heights they clearly well designed for their respective “terrains” although the TR’s very solid road capabilities to go with trail and its weight in my US8.5 of barely over 9 oz for a high stacked road to trail shoe make it a better value for me.

Saucony Tempus ( RTR Review )

Adam: I’m also a big fan of the Tempus, but wish it had the Ride TR’s Outsole, totally echo what Mike is saying. Before I received the Ride TR I was running the tempus on much of the same terrain. I prefer the Tempus’s upper, but the outsole is not sufficient for trails. Hopefully Saucony will make a Tempus TR soon to try.

Saucony Peregrine 12 ( RTR Review )

[You can see from the outsole profile how the Peregrine is much more streamlined and full in coverage and more protective for technical uses]

Renee: I agree with Mike. For technical terrain, a better ground feel, and better security, the Peregrine 12 is the better shoe. I’ve run the Peregrine 12 for 20 milers and found the midsole and comfort fine, but on rolling and more mellow terrain, the Ride 15 TR works better in terms of comfort because of the stack height, drop, and softer midsole. I wore a women’s size 8 in both. The weight is the same.

John : Peregrine 12 is more stable, firmer and the upper has a better and lower profile upper that has great foothold and security. The Peregrine’s traction profile is more aggressive while the Ride 15 TR performs well on crossover terrain such as road and groomed paths. Peregrine 12 is a stiffer shoe with a bit more rock protection and is somewhat runnable on the roads, but not as enjoyable as the Ride 15 TR.

Saucony Xodus Ultra ( RTR Review )

[It was hard to get a good pic, but the Ride 15 TR tapers much more towards the front]

Renee: I found the forefoot and toebox roomy in both shoes, but the Xodus Ultra has an ultra fit, allowing for swelling. The fit is still secure. The Xodus Ultra is probably too much shoe for me for short distances, and the Ride TR will be more comfortable on rolling terrain or moderate trail. The Xodus weighs about 0.50oz / 14g more in my women’s size 8.

Similar outsole segmentation, but Xodus Ultra (bottom) has more coverage + woven rock plate

Saucony Endorphin Edge ( RTR Review )

Adam: The Endoprhin Edge is my favorite fast trail shoe at the moment, but over longer distances, the firmness of the plate can come through more than the plateless Ride TR. The PEBA based foam of the edge has significantly more rebound, but less damping. It’s more propulsive than the Ride TR, but also a less smooth ride. The upper on the Ride TR feels more stable but less breathable. The Endorphin Edge’s outsole is a softer and has grippier rubber that’s better for trail, but I would worry about it’s long term durability on road. For racing, I’d pick the Endorphin Edge anytime, but for everyday training, or for a mix or road and trail I’d take the Ride TR.

Nike Pegasus Trail 4 ( RTR Review )

Sam: A very, very close comparison. Lower stack and higher drop at 30-32 mm heel (measured) / 20.5 mm forefoot (spec. 8.5mm-9.5 mm drop) the Peg 4 goes the same places the Ride TR does but with more agility/quicker feel (on both road and trail) and a thinner if softer more rebounding midsole.

With 27mm at the forefoot in the Ride the forefoot cushion difference is felt but..as its foam is softer and more resilient in feel, and its outsole better segmented things get close

The Ride is actually lighter by a few tenths of an ounce even with its higher stack height.

Uppers are similar in fit and volume up to the forefoot with the Nike hold overall yet more secure than the Ride with a softer less rigid feel. At the toe box the Nike is broader, stretchier and has no toe bumper while the Ride is more precisely fitting with denser debris mesh and a stout toe bumper, the Nike having none.

The Ride 15 is stiffer up front with a less polished and not as quick feeling outsole pattern. Overall I prefer the Nike with the Ride pulling ahead as runs get longer due to its deeper cushion and especially upfront

Renee: I agree with Sam. Both the Peg Trail 4 and Ride TR are road-to-trail shoes with similar purposes. The Ride TR offers more comfort underfoot for longer distances, and the Peg Trail 4, despite the higher drop, runs more securely and faster on uneven or single track trails. The outsole of the Peg Trail 4 looks more like that of a road shoe, and gravel and mud can become trapped between the lugs, unlike the Ride TR’s outsoe . I wore a 7.5 in the Peg Trail 4 because I use it for short distances as compared to a size 8 in the Ride TR; otherwise, I suggest the same size.

Nike ZoomX Zegama Trail ( RTR Review )

Sam: Heavier by 1 ounce / 28g, higher stacked at 37/33 and with a lower 4mm drop, the Zegama Trail is also for me a door to trail shoe. It too has a firmer outsole but doesn’t pretend to provide big long flex relying on a far front flex point (something the Ride lacks and that I like) with rear of that a rigid lightly rockered platform. More stable and more cushioned and a bit firmer, it is also more sharply reactive due to its firmer than Nike race shoe ZoomX. It is a longer distances, more protective option for the same terrain the Ride TR goes: moderate trails, dirt roads, and some pavement. Its upper is more complex with equally excellent rear hold and a broader if lower toe box. But for its weight, it would be an easy pick for me over the Ride TR.

Mike P (9.5): For me there’s a big difference in overall feel - the Zegama feels big and clunky on foot compared to the Ride 15 TR. Impenetrable underfoot, also a bit back weighted, I find them somewhat hard to maneuver in moderate+ terrain. That being said, the Zegama does have way more trail range than the Ride (although of course limited by its wet grip). Zegama is similarly high stacked, but noticeably nearly 1.5 oz heavier in my size. This is clearly a case where the Zegama works very well on easy to moderate trails, but do you really need all that shoe in comparison to the much lighter and more streamlined Ride TR?

Renee: The Zegama is a heavier shoe, with more stack and cushion as compared to the Ride TR. The Ride TR still provides a good amount of comfort and cushion for distance runs. The midsole of the Ride TR is softer and more bouncy despite the Zegama having ZoomX (a much less responsive ZoomX than Nike road shoes). The Zegama is probably a better trail option because it offers a more stable ride (avoid wet terrain though!), but I agree with Mike. Why choose a heavier shoe if you don’t really need it? The Zegama was a bit narrow in the forefoot for me because of the notch to allow for flex.

Topo Ultraventure 3 ( RTR Review )

Mike P (10.0): I reviewed the Ultraventure 3 just prior to receiving the Ride TR. It’s a great shoe, super comfortable, smooth riding for mid-long runs in easy-light terrain. I thought I would end up racking up most of my easy trail mileage in them, but I actually prefer the Ride TR for the easier end of the spectrum. The Ride TR is just lighter, narrower, and feels less bulky. The Ultraventure 3 is for sure more versatile though. Despite its mellow outsole, foothold is great, and I found they worked very well up to moderate+ terrain. On the lighter end of the trails spectrum, the UV3 can handle it all, but at the very light end, the Ride TR works better. Both are great shoes.

Jeff B: Completely agree with Mike, except for the preference. The Topo is incredibly comfortable and smooth, and absolutely fantastic in relatively smooth terrain. There’s considerably more bulk compared to the Saucony, but I’m happy to take that hit for the extra room up front and extra squish underneath. I found the Topo foothold considerably less confidence inspiring than the Ride, but the other elements have me leaning Topo the whole way.

Hoka Challenger ATR ( RTR Review )

Mike P (9.5): Hoka door to trail option but also designed for moderate trails, with its wider platform, the Challenger is a bit more versatile in terms of terrain. Some find them comfortable enough to use on semi-technical terrain. The Challenger is somewhat high-stacked, although not quite as high as the Ride TR. Challenger utilizes Hoka’s rockered ride- you really have to hit the rear/middle of the shoe and roll with it. The Ride TR feels smoother to me though, and I prefer it for my easy trail mileage.

Renee: I agree with Mike. The rockered ride of the Challenger (I have version 5) contrasts with the more traditional ride of the Ride TR. On single track, the Ride TR offers a better outsole and ride. The fit of the Challenger, because of the rocker, felt narrow for me, which was a problem on even rolling gravel roads. While the platform is wide, the fit was narrow.

Brooks Divide 3 ( RTR Review )

Mike P (9.5): A slightly different take on a trail “trainer”. The Brooks Loft V1 foam is firmer, denser, and you get less of it. The ride is also firm, but more stable up to moderate to light technical terrain. It’s ok on the road, but the Ride TR is smoother. Traction is comparable between the two, but again, the Divide has a wider platform, so for sure is more trail-oriented. Divide is more spacious in the forefoot which is preferable for me. Divide is also an amazing value at $100. For easier terrain, I’d go with the Ride TR for comfort, but anything moderate+ I’d go with the Divide.

Renee: The Divide 3 is a great value at $100, but it does feel like a $100 shoe compared to the Ride TR. The fit of the Ride TR is more polished. The forefoot of the Divide was a bit sloppy on my feet. The Ride TR offers more comfort underfoot for distances. The drop of the Divide is more trail-oriented. I wore a women’s size 8 in both.

ASICS Fuji Lite 2 ( RTR Review )

Renee: The Fuji Lite 2 is a lighter shoe and is better for short, faster efforts. The lugs are smaller, but offer good grip on light terrain. For road use and all-day comfort, the Ride TR works better. In terms of a fun factor on trail, the Fuji Lite 2 is a better pick. Neither shoe offers a technical-trail fit or ride, but both can handle a variety of other terrain. I wore a women’s size 8 in both.

Mike P (9.5): I liked the Fuji Lite 2 initially, but after not too long, the midsole compressed quite a bit - especially under the ball of the foot. The Asics foam is softer and lighter, and for me, felt like it was bottoming out at times. I raced a 30K on slickrock in Moab in them and got some blisters on both arches due to upper insecurity. I wouldn’t attempt to race the Ride TR on slickrock, but the Saucony upper is more refined in both fit and materials. Both shoes are oriented towards light terrain. I’ll take the Ride 15 TR any over the Fuji Lite 2.

John: I agree with Renee that the Fuji Lite 2 is great for shorter, faster efforts. Both are solid choices for road-to-trail use and you won’t do wrong by choosing either on a given day. I prefer the Fuji Lite because my foot is positioned in a lower center of gravity and it has better ground feel.

The Saucony Ride 15 TR is available now including at our partners here:

SAUCONY HERE

RUNNING WAREHOUSE HERE

AMAZON HERE

Tester Profiles

Mike Postaski currently focuses on long mountainous ultras - anywhere from 50K up to his favorite - 100M. 5'10", 138 lbs, midfoot/forefoot striker - he typically averages 70 mpw (mostly on trails), ramping up to nearly 100 mpw during race buildups. A recent 2:39 road marathoner, his easy running pace ranges from 7:30 - 9:00/mi. In 2022 Mike won both the Standhope 100M and IMTUF 100M trail ultras within a 7 week period - both extremely rugged Idaho mountain races. Mike's shoe preferences lean towards firmer, dense cushioning, and shoes with narrower profiles. He prefers extra forefoot space, especially for long ultras, and he strongly dislikes pointy toe boxes.

Renee is a former U. S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of running and writing started. She isn’t that awesome of a runner, but she tries really hard. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles take place on rural country roads in Nebraska, meaning mud, gravel, dirt, hills, and the occasional field. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and 3:26:45 for the marathon.

Adam Glueck is an endurance athlete (cross country and AT skiing, running, mountain and gravel biking) who formerly competed at the NCAA’s in Cross Country Skiing while studying at Dartmouth College. He can run a 4:43 mile, 16:20 5k, 1:23 half, and grew up running in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. He’s currently working as an engineer in the Bay Area and exploring trails from Santa Cruz to Tahoe. You can Adam on Strava here: https://www.strava.com/athletes/9267222

Sam is the Editor and Founder of Road Trail Run. He is 65 with a 2018 3:40 Boston qualifier. 2022 will be Sam’s 50th year of running. He has a decades old 2:28 marathon PR. These days he runs halves in the just sub 1:40 range if he is lucky, training 30-40 miles per week mostly at moderate paces on the roads and trails of New Hampshire and Utah. He is 5’9” tall and weighs about 164 lbs, if he is not enjoying too many fine New England IPA’s.

S amples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article . These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'

Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products

4 comments:

Great review, thank you! Any idea if Saucony will release a 2E? After your review, I know the standard fit won't work for me. The Xodus Ultra is a perfect fit for me and that's sizing up .5

This is a very informative review, thank you. I’m finding that the combination of road to trail and medium to high stack works very well for me e.g. Atreyu Base Trail, ATR, etc. Regarding the Ride 15 TR toebox width, could you provide comparisons to other popular shoes like the Speedgoat 4/5, Salomon, etc? While these other shoes may lean heavily towards trail and technical trail, I think it could help the reader in deciding whether the Ride 15 TR might work. I have slightly wide feet in that Topos fit me best, but I have run extensively in Speedgoat 3-5s (100K-100 miles with few foot issues), Atreyu Base Trails (worked great on an 18 mile trail run earlier), and Salomon (funny enough did a 50 miler in the Sense Pro 4s though for a few hours my feet felt like they were being squeezed until I loosened them and changed into thin socks) and they fit and work well enough.

Andy, not sure about 2E - haven't heard anything yet. Fit-wise compared to the Xodus Ultra: there's definitely less volume over the top, but the width across the forefoot is probably about the same. The Ride TR also does taper a bit. So it probably comes down to your specific foot shape and feel in the end. Anon- I'd say the Ride TR toebox is a less extreme version of the new Speedgoat 5. Shape is somewhat similar, but SG5 is slightly narrower, slightly pointier, and also less height/volume. After adjusting some tension in the Ride TR, I find them quite comfortable, whereas I can't run the SG5 unless I leave the forefoot lacing with zero tension. I actually just got back from Mt. Rainier and did some running and hiking in the Sense Pro 4 (GTX). The toebox is actually quite similar to the Ride TR. I think the SP4 is a bit shallower though and does press down on the top of the foot. Keep in mind that I can get away with a bit less tension and a bit more comfort with the Ride TR given the fact that I'm not taking them out on any moderate/technical trails. I really do like them and have run them several times already after completing the review. I've got some perfect road-trail routes where I can alternate between climbing up and down gulches and linking them up with some residential street running. They're just perfect for that.

How is this for an overpronator? I use Guides and Peregrines for reference . Looking for a road to trail shoe / single shoe I can bring while traveling for roads and trails, so maybe something that leans road shoe but still has an outsole that can handle some trail. I was also looking at the ASICS GT-2000 11 TR if you know anything about that shoe?

Anatomy of a Shoe

Here’s how we break down the shoe in every review.

Performance
Accessories

Bipped Up Cap

We use cookies to provide the best experience on our website. Read our Cookie Policy .

Saucony Ride 15 TR Review: Ride on the Wild Side

What You Need To Know

Weighs 9.2 oz. (260 g.) for a US M9 / 8.5 oz. (240 g.) for a US W7.5

Saucony’s Ride 15 with a wild side

Fits into the same category as the Pegasus Trail 4

There’s more to this one than just some extra rubber

Available now for $140

TAYLOR: Can you believe we’re already rounding out the year with the Q4 releases? It must mean that TRE is around the corner. There are quite a few brands that have put together all-star lineups on the down-and-dirty side of the industry, and Saucony is one of them. The Boston brand has added something new and updated something old in just about every segment of the trail game throughout 2022. It slimmed the Peregrine 12 , overhauled the Xodus Ultra , and who can forget the wild child Endorphin Edge ?

The latest addition comes in the form of Saucony’s first door-to-trail kicker. The Saucony Ride 15 TR takes a tried and true model from the streets and lets it explore its wild side. Saucony’s trail division has enough know-how to get this done in a sensible manner, too. This isn’t just a true roadie with some thick lugs slapped on the bottom.

The base formula is that of the Ride 15 — a familiar, well-liked daily trainer. Our road crew enjoyed it, and now it’s our turn. The big difference is that Saucony added a PWRTRAC outsole with 3.5 mm lugs, a slightly beefed-up upper, and an external gilly system for lockdown.

Now, are these enhancements enough to call this a trail shoe? Survey says…

SAM: I don’t know much, and the older I get, the less I’m convinced I know. However, I’m sure of two things about this year: Saucony has had a banger year for shoe releases, and this is, by all accounts, the year of the hybrid shoe. With each new Saucony drop this year, the running stalwart has given us more to love. Whether it’s a race day shoe for roads ( Endorphin Pro 3 ) or trails (Endorphin Edge), or a high-end plated trainer ( Endorphin Speed 3 ), they’ve turned out the goods in spades.

We’ve also seen several new hybrid road-to-trail shoes released, including the Inov-8 Parkclaw G 280 , the Reebok Floatride Energy 4 Adventure , the Altra Outroad , and the Nike Pegasus Trail 4 . It makes sense that Saucony would look to roll its hot streak into the hybrid market.

They do just that with the Saucony Ride 15 TR. This hybrid takes their popular Ride base and beefs it up for trails with a burlier outsole and enhanced lockdown and protection. It keeps the cushy slab of PWRRUN foam and mesh upper construction and adds 3.5mm chevron-shaped PWRTRAC lugs and Formfit lockdown in the midfoot. The extras add about an ounce to a US M10 but keep this shoe under 10 oz, which isn’t too shabby. Does all of this make a hybrid that can continue Saucony’s great string of releases this year? Read on, dear runner.

TAYLOR: What most people love about this shoe is that it’s simple. Simplicity done well can be a very special thing. In this case, it’s sure helping the Ride 15 TR’s profile. We’re talking about a moderate slab of foam with a more traditional mesh upper. There’s nothing wrong with that. It provides a consistent feel that most runners would be familiar with and even enjoy.

Okay, the Ride 15 TR isn’t just mesh and EVA. The upper fit is slim-ish but not quite as conforming as the Peregrine 12. A gilly strap helps cinch down the midfoot nicely. The gusseted tongue certainly comes in handy here too. Combine that with a decent amount of padding and structure in the heel, and I was surprised by how much I enjoyed the fit and how well it performed on anything from gravel roads to moderate trails.

The moderate stack of PWRRUN (a different formulation than what’s found in Peregrine or past trail models) offers both moderate cushion and a touch of responsiveness. It’s a soft/medium soft consistency that feels light underfoot. I found it to be fine with easy miles and can take a beating on uptempo efforts. It feels like a daily trainer in that way.

A long flex groove runs lengthwise through the midsole. This flexibility in the midsole helped the shoe adapt to varying trail conditions.

Underneath is a sneakily grippy PWRTRAC outsole. It’s the same outsole that all Saucony trail shoes sport, but this one looks and feels a little bit different. It feels gritty rather than sticky. To be honest, I underestimated it. It performed well on just about any surface. I did find that the 3.5mm lugs didn’t dig into softer stuff all that well, but that’s not typically the type of terrain one would want this shoe to be on, anyways.

Other subtle but noteworthy features are a gaiter attachment, lace garage, and stout toe bumpers with rubberized overlays around the toe box for durability.

ALEX: This was a fun shoe to test, mostly due to the fun mixed surface route that I mapped out to test it in. The lower tread makes this a versatile road-to-trail option. The PWRTRAC outsole is equipped with 3.5mm lugs vs. the Saucony Peregrine’s 5mm lugs. The ride is nice and smooth on gravel, with just the right amount of traction and support. Everything comes together in a lightweight package.

The fit is secure and comfortable. The two make-or-break areas for me are the tongue and heel collar, and both pass the test. The gusseted tongue is lightly padded and unobtrusive, with no rigidity or pressure points on the front of the ankle.

Overall the shoe is comfortable and protective. The toe bumper is better suited for technical terrain than the shoe is as a whole, but being as clumsy as I am, regardless of terrain, I’m ok with it.

Finally, I appreciate the 8mm drop. With most of my trail shoes falling between 4-6mm, I was happy to have some extra lift.

SAM: On step-in, this shoe revels in comfort. The upper is appropriately padded and flexes nicely in the right places while holding your foot securely under that FORMFIT structure. The padded and gusseted tongue sits where it should. There’s a toe guard overlay that doesn’t poke at you and protects well, and a little more structure in the heel counter. Underfoot, the chunk of PWRRUN foam (35mm heel/27mm forefoot for an 8mm drop) and the PWRRUN+ sockliner are cushy and soft. The Ride 15 TR is comfy right away, and for a hybrid shoe like this, that’s a nice feeling.

PWRRUN is one of our favorite lines of foam here at BITR, and even though the recipe here is mostly Saucony’s “lower-end” version, it feels incredible underfoot. Sure, this recipe might not have the springy bounce of the PWRRUN PB in the Endorphin line, but it coddles those precious feet of yours with each strike and has enough energy return to still manage a fun, lively feel. The hefty stack makes for a daily trainer that shines as miles pile up.

Finishing out the hybrid package is the PWRTRAC outsole. The lug shape and spacing on the Ride 15 TR are similar to what’s found on the Endorphin Edge, but with less lug height to handle better on roads. We liked the grip on the Edge, and there are similar thoughts here. I’d be hard-pressed to point out any effect of the 1.5mm difference in lug depth. These are plenty grippy on roads and trails.

TAYLOR: In a world of max, don’t be surprised at the lack of protection here. The midsole is lighter and more flexible. There’s no rock plate. Even though the stack is higher than it looks (35 mm to 27mm – 8mm drop), it doesn’t feel as protected as something like the Hoka Mafate Speed 4, Nike Wildhorse, Topo Athletic Ultraventure 3, Altra Mont Blanc, or even the Saucony Xodus Ultra. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, either. Just don’t expect to mask all underfoot invaders because you will have a decent amount of ground feel once the trail gets more technical.

As will be echoed by Alex and Sam, this shoe isn’t marketed as a technical terrain runner, and that is very appropriately noted. Just keep this one to the smoother stuff where it belongs.

ALEX: There is a time and place for all that soft PWRRUN foam, and it’s not on technical trails with steep descents. The midsole design and materials allow for way too much flex and torsional movement as soon as the terrain is more technical and varied.

The toe box was a little narrow and shallow for me, reinforcing my preference to keep this shoe for shorter, non-technical runs.

The overall aesthetic of this shoe is kind of blah. I found the elementary-like Crayola blue colorway to be a little lackluster. Not a dealbreaker, but not something that necessarily catches your eye.

SAM: That lovely thick slab of PWRRUN foam may shine on roads and flat trails, but it becomes unwieldy on anything technical. Even a sideways slant to the trail underfoot makes you struggle to keep your ankles from wobbling all over the place. It’s just a little too soft, and the stack is too high to inspire confidence.

As good as the PWRTRAC outsole is, the sporadic lug placement and swathes of exposed midsole foam are particularly susceptible to wet roots and branches. At first, it also gave off that “running on claws” feeling that many trail runners do on pavement. It either eased out over time, or I got used to it, but the outsole arrangement is more suited for trails than roads.

This shoe runs a touch narrow and long. It felt vaguely elven on my feet and not in the cool “Legolas walking on snow up the pass of Caradhras” way. I’m glad Alex brought up the look, and I’m not the only one who struggles with the visuals on the Ride 15 TR. Looks are purely subjective, but this shoe looks suspiciously like my three-year-old’s Stride Rites. As much as he’s thrilled anytime we match, a velcro-looking toddler trainer mixed with an elf shoe isn’t my preferred style.

Saucony Ride 15 TR Conclusion

TAYLOR: The hybrid trail shoe category is starting to heat up. With shoes like the Nike Pegasus Trail 4 and Altra Outroad standing as some of the highlights of the category, the Saucony Ride 15 TR has some stiff competition. However, I think it puts up a dang good fight. For most runs, I would prefer the Ride 15 TR over other available options because of its simplicity and versatility.

Honestly, I could see it as an excellent option for road runners looking to dip a toe into the trail side. It should also work for runners who regularly get a good mix of pavement and dirt. If you’re a Saucony Ride 15 fan, you can easily adjust to life on the wild side, and it could be a good road option when winter rolls around, too.

With all that Saucony has released this year, the Ride 15 TR is a solid way to wrap things up.

ALEX: This one is a super comfortable, versatile option to add to your 2022 Saucony lineup. For me, it’s a perfectly soft, secure ride for recovery runs on non-technical terrain.

SAM: The Saucony Ride 15 TR is a great hybrid road-to-trail option for runners who don’t want to lose that cushy road feel on their forays down unpaved paths. It’s very comfortable, supportive, and grippy, and the slab of PWRRUN paired with the PWRRUN+ sock liner is a winner for the underfoot feel. This would be a perfect fit if your routes have more road and level, rolling trails. Even if it looks like it might fit Elrond’s feet better, and technical sections should be avoided when wearing it, The Ride 15 TR should be considered alongside great hybrids like the Nike Pegasus Trail 4 and the Altra Outroad.

You can pick up the Saucony Ride 15 TR for $140 at Running Warehouse (featuring free 2-day shipping and 90-day returns) by using the shop link below.

Want to learn more about how our review process works? Check out this guide .

Have something to say? Leave a Comment

the Authors

Taylor Bodin

Taylor Bodin is a trail and ultra runner living in Estes Park, Colo., with his wife and daughters. Trail running is pretty much the only hobby he can manage right now and loves it. Every so often, he will pop off a race or FKT attempt because competition is pure and the original motivator for him getting into running anyways. When not running, Taylor is a 1st grade teacher, running coach (track & field, Cross Country, and Trail/Ultra athletes), and volunteers at his church.

Sam lives in Baltimore with his wife and two kids and spends his days fixing espresso machines for Ceremony Coffee Roasters. He runs with the Faster Bastards when he can, races ultras, and has been working on completing the AT section by section. He thinks the best days are made of long miles on nasty trails, but that a good surf session, a really stunning book, or a day of board games are pretty all right too.

All-time favorite shoes: Saucony Xodus Ultra, Topo Athletic Ultraventure 3, Altra Lone Peak

Skechers GoRun Razor 4 Review: Speed. I Am Speed.

Topo Athletic Ultraventure 3 Review: Love at First Zip(Foam)

Dynafit Ultra DNA Review: Mont Blanc or Bust

Hoka Speedgoat 6 Review: Must We Demote The Goat?

VJ Lightspeed Review: I’m Proud of You, Cowboy

Inov-8 Trailfly Speed Review: Lean, Mean Technical Trail Machine

Best Asics Running Shoes Right Now

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 Matryx Review: Voltron Levels Up

HQ 1805 Eastern Ave Baltimore, MD 21231

Weekly community runs from the @believeintherun HQ. Every Thursday at 6:30 PM. More About Believe Run Club

How Our Reviews Work
Job Opportunities

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy

Toroidally focused ultrasonic flaw detectors

Acoustic Methods
Published: 28 July 2011
Volume 47 , pages 308–310, ( 2011 )

Cite this article

A. V. Shevelev 1 &
Zh. V. Zatsepilova 2

33 Accesses

Explore all metrics

New-type toroidally focused ultrasonic flaw detectors, whose application provides an appreciable increase in the flaw detection rate with retention of high sensitivity to flaws, are considered. The construction of a flaw detector is presented, the sizes of a gauge for the formation of the toroidal surface of a lens are given, and the technology of the manufacturing of a toroidal lens is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Optics in Medicine

A review of speckle pattern fabrication and assessment for digital image correlation.

Analytical and numerical fresnel models of phase diffractive optical elements for imaging applications

Ermolov, I.N., Aleshin, N.P., and Potapov, A.I., Nerazrushayushchii control’ (Nondestructive Testing), book 2: Akusticheskie metody kontrolya (Acoustic Testing), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1991.

Google Scholar

Nerazrushayushchii kontrol’ (Spravochnik) (Nondestructive Testing: Handbook), Klyuev, V.V., Ed., vol. 3: Ul’trazvukovoi kontrol’ (Ultrasonic Testing), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Elektrostal Polytechnic Institute, Branch of the National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, ul. Pervomaiskaya 7, Elektrostal, Moscow oblast, 144000, Russia

A. V. Shevelev

Elektrostal Heavy Engineering Plant JSC, ul. Krasnaya 19, Elektrostal, Moscow oblast, 144005, Russia

Zh. V. Zatsepilova

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zh. V. Zatsepilova .

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Shevelev, Zh.V. Zatsepilova, 2011, published in Defektoskopiya, 2011, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 19–22.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Shevelev, A.V., Zatsepilova, Z.V. Toroidally focused ultrasonic flaw detectors. Russ J Nondestruct Test 47 , 308–310 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830911050093

Download citation

Received : 14 January 2011

Published : 28 July 2011

Issue Date : May 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830911050093

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

ultrasonic flaw detectors
focusing lens
flaw detection
nondestructive testing
inspection of pipes
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

History of cooperation
Areas of cooperation
Procurement policy
Useful links
Becoming a supplier
Procurement
Rosatom newsletter

Rosatom Global presence
Rosatom in region
For suppliers
Preventing corruption
Press centre

Rosatom Starts Life Tests of Third-Generation VVER-440 Nuclear Fuel

16 June, 2020 / 13:00

This site uses cookies. By continuing your navigation, you accept the use of cookies. For more information, or to manage or to change the cookies parameters on your computer, read our Cookies Policy. Learn more

IMAGES

Test: SAUCONY Excursion TR 15 GTX| bunert online shop
Test: SAUCONY Excursion TR 15 GTX| bunert online shop
Saucony Men's Excursion TR15 Running Shoes
Test: SAUCONY Excursion TR 16 GTX
Test: SAUCONY Excursion TR 15 GTX| bunert online shop
Saucony Excursion TR8 Review

VIDEO

Saucony Test Run with Endorphin Elite
Test Saucony Endorphin Speed 4
Star excursion test
Saucony Excursion TR14 GTX SKU: 9472575
excursion test of my 8 inch 350 watt subwoofer
Saucony Excursion TR 16 GTX® SKU: 9733665

COMMENTS

Saucony Excursion TR13 Review
The Saucony Excursion TR13 felt good as an everyday shoe to walk around in or stand in. On the trails these shoes did not provide the performance that I like in a trail shoe. Introduction Saucony Excursion TR13. The Saucony Excursion TR13 is a mid-priced trail running shoe. This is a neutral running shoe with a 8mm offset at a weight of 9.7oz.
Saucony Excursion Tr15: The Ultimate Trail Running Shoe Review
The Saucony Mens Excursion Tr15 Trail Running Shoe is a well-built, lightweight, and comfortable shoe with a correct fit and excellent traction on dry trails. It offers plenty of room in the toe box and is breathable in hot weather. However, some users have experienced durability issues with the shoes splitting in less than 12 months and poor ...
Saucony Excursion TR 14 VS TR 15: Best Trail Running Shoe?
Saucony has refined the placement of these overlays to offer an improved fit that hugs your foot securely without restricting natural movement.. The materials used for these overlays are sturdy, ensuring the shoe can withstand the demands of rugged trail terrains.. Mesh Panels Saucony Excursion TR14. The mesh panels incorporated into the upper of the Excursion TR14 serve two important purposes.
Saucony Excursion TR 16 Reviews
Runs Narrow Runs Wide. Poor Support Great Support. I don't know what Saucony changed from their previous versions of this Excursion TR, but this TR16 hurt my feet. I have previously loved my Excursions (TR11 to TR15) and previously their Cohesion TR series. However, I tried the Excursion TR 16, but after about half a mile, the ball of my feet ...
Saucony Excursion TR8
For the Excursion TR8, Saucony took note of what runners loved most about the shoe and made sure to hold on to the essentials. Many runners reported using these as a light alternative to traditional hiking boots, others mentioned how they loved the comfort and breathability for everyday use.. Saucony Excursion TR8 kept the popular traits, enhanced some features and started offering this shoe ...
Saucony Excursion TR 15 GTX Reviews
Reviewed at Saucony. Bulletproof from water while I walk my dogs in the rain on our daily 20K. However be warned, very slippery on any metal surfaces so walk around the metal grates, plates, manhole covers, etc. I double knot the laces as they came undone the 1st time I wore the shoes. True fit to my size, men's 9.5.
Saucony Excursion TR11
The Saucony Excursion TR11 is a poor choice for the frequent trail runner or thru-hiker. If you're looking for a reliable shoe for off-road running, keep looking. The TR11 just won't cut it. While problems outweigh the good stuff on the TR11, some users might appreciate the soft midsole cushioning, the stable design, lightweight construction ...
Saucony Excursion Tr16 Gtx: All-terrain Winter Trail Shoes
SAUCONY EXCURSION TR16 GTX: DATA SHEET. Price: €130. Being a veteran shoe already, you can surely find offers below in various stores. Weight: 286 grams. Over the years, the Excursion has continued to get lighter and it's appreciated. Stack height & Drop: 23mm forefoot / 31mm heel.
Saucony Excursion TR 15 Reviews
Runs Small Runs Large. Runs Narrow Runs Wide. Poor Support Great Support. I ordered the Saucony Excursion TR 15, Alloy/Mauve color. Very comfortable. Will be keeping them. I like the color, but I will say that when I look down, it all looks purple to me. I think it depends on the light. However, they're fun looking, and I'm wearing them!
Men's Excursion TR16
Cohesion TR16. The start of unstoppable. Meet your all-around trail runner. An outdoor essential that's capable of taking you farther, the Excursion TR 16 is up for anything. Springy and comfortable, it's designed with traction-ready grip that hugs any terrain you throw at it.
Saucony Trail Running Shoe Range Explained
Saucony Peregrine 13, Peregrine 13 ST and Peregrine 13 GTX. Weight: 260g (men's)/ 230g (women's) Drop: 4mm. Lug depth: 5mm (13 and GTX, 6.5mm ST) Support: Neutral. This shoe is named after the fastest animal on Earth for a reason. Lightweight and yet fantastically comfortable, the Saucony Peregrine 13 is for blistering speedy trail runs.
Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine: Best Trail Running Shoe?
Important Point. Both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine excel in providing a comfortable and supportive fit for trail runners. The Excursion's anatomical design, foot-hugging capabilities, available width options, and customizable lacing system ensure a secure and stable fit, promoting confidence on the trails.
Saucony Excursion TR12
The Saucony Excursion TR12 is a trail shoe that provides cushioning and some stability while you are out on the trail. The shoes are not designed to be used in the mud or in wet conditions, so that is something to keep in mind. ... We did not test the Excursion TR12 yet. The Saucony Excursion TR12 is a trail shoe and an updated version of the ...
Saucony Excursion TR 15 Trail Shoe Review
Website: https://www.couriersdepot.comShopfront: https://www.couriersdepot.com/shopShop Trainers: https://www.couriersdepot.com/mens-work-trainersBlog po...
Saucony Excursion Trail Running Shoes
Men's Excursion TR16. $65.00. Wishlist. Official Saucony site - Shop the full collection of Excursion Shoes and find what you're looking for today.
Men's Excursion TR9
Excursion TR9. Select a Color : Black | Orange. $70.00 $53.00. Black | Orange. No Longer Available. Sorry! This item is sold out. Product Details. The Excursion TR9 has a trail-specific outsole that provides excellent protection and traction on rough terrain, along with an upper that hugs and supports your foot throughout your run.
Saucony Excursion VS Cohesion: Major Differences Explained
The Excursion excels in providing durability, traction, and support for trail running, while the Cohesion offers a lightweight design, comfortable cushioning, and versatile usage for road running. Whether you prioritize off-road adventures or regular road runs, both models deliver reliable performance.
Saucony Ride 15 TR Multi Tester Review with 9 Comparisons
Saucony Ride 15 TR ($140, $160 GTX) Introduction. Take the excellent road daily trainer the Ride 15 with its new softer, lighter, more energetic PWRRUN foam, give it a trail focused upper and outsole and you get the Ride 15 TR. At light 9.2 oz / 261 g (US9) yet high stacked at 35mm heel / 27mm forefoot. it is the door to trail offering in the ...
Saucony Ride 15 TR Review: Ride on the Wild Side
ALEX: This was a fun shoe to test, mostly due to the fun mixed surface route that I mapped out to test it in. The lower tread makes this a versatile road-to-trail option. The PWRTRAC outsole is equipped with 3.5mm lugs vs. the Saucony Peregrine's 5mm lugs. The ride is nice and smooth on gravel, with just the right amount of traction and support.
"Metallurgical Plant "Electrostal" JSC
Round table 2021. "Electrostal" Metallurgical plant" JSC has a number of remarkable time-tested traditions. One of them is holding an annual meeting with customers and partners in an extеnded format in order to build development pathways together, resolve pressing tasks and better understand each other. Although the digital age ...
Toroidally focused ultrasonic flaw detectors
New-type toroidally focused ultrasonic flaw detectors, whose application provides an appreciable increase in the flaw detection rate with retention of high sensitivity to flaws, are considered. The construction of a flaw detector is presented, the sizes of a gauge for the formation of the toroidal surface of a lens are given, and the technology of the manufacturing of a toroidal lens is described.
Machine-Building Plant (Elemash)
In 1954, Elemash began to produce fuel assemblies, including for the first nuclear power plant in the world, located in Obninsk. In 1959, the facility produced the fuel for the Soviet Union's first icebreaker. Its fuel assembly production became serial in 1965 and automated in 1982. 1. Today, Elemash is one of the largest TVEL nuclear fuel ...
Rosatom Starts Life Tests of Third-Generation VVER-440 Nuclear Fuel
The life tests started after successful completion of hydraulic tests (hydraulic filling) of the mock-up with the aim to determine RK3+ hydraulic resistance. Life tests are carried out on a full-scale research hot run-in test bench V-440 and will last for full 1500 hours. The aim of tests is to study mechanical stability of RK3+ components ...

Recent Posts

Top rated products

Product tags

Saucony Excursion Tr15: The Ultimate Trail Running Shoe Review

Saucony Trail Running Shoe: Excursion Tr15

Key Features and Benefits

Positive Reviews

Negative Reviews

Final Thoughts

Your Expert Guide to the Saucony Excursion TR15: Unleash Your Trail Running Potential!

Discover the Best Alternatives to the Saucony Excursion TR15 Trail Running Shoe

What to consider when choosing the perfect pair of trail running shoes

Frequently Asked Questions about Trail Running Shoes

9 thoughts on “ Saucony Excursion Tr15: The Ultimate Trail Running Shoe Review ”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Saucony Excursion TR11

Breathability

Training advice & race plans Weekly coaching office hours Deals from brands you love

The Saucony trail running shoe range explained

Saucony Peregrine 13, Peregrine 13 ST and Peregrine 13 GTX

Saucony Peregrine 13

Saucony Peregrine 13 ST

Saucony Peregrine 13 GTX

Saucony Endorphin Trail and Endorphin Trail Mid

Saucony Endorphin Trail

Saucony Endorphin Trail Mid

Saucony Endorphin Edge

Saucony Xodus Ultra

Saucony Ride 15 TR and Ride 15 GTX

Saucony Ride 15 TR

Saucony Ride 15 TR GTX

Saucony Excursion TR16 GTX

For all the latest news, tips and gear reviews, sign up to the Trail Running Newsletter .

Did you mean?

Like being first?

Refer A Friend Give $20,

Excursion TR9

Alternate Views

No Longer Available

LIKE BEING FIRST?

The original running brand

Saucony Excursion VS Cohesion: Major Differences Explained

Overview And History Of Saucony Excursion And Cohesion

Saucony Excursion

Saucony Cohesion

History And Evolution Of The Excursion Line And Cohesion Line

Excursion Line

Cohesion line

Major Differences : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Design And Construction : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Upper Construction And Materials

Saucony Excursion

Midsole Cushioning And Support Features

Outsole Design And Traction Capabilities

Fit And Comfort : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Fit Characteristics And Considerations

Comfort Features And Technologies

Saucony’s Advanced Cushioning Technologies

Performance And Functionality : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Performance In Different Terrains And Conditions

Important Point

Stability And Support For Trail Running And Road Running

Durability And Long-Lasting Performance

Weight And Flexibility : Saucony Excursion Vs Saucony Cohesion

Weight Comparison

Flexibility Assessment

Impact On Performance And Fatigue Levels

Performance

Fatigue Levels

Breathability : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Waterproofing : Saucony Excursion vs Saucony Cohesion

Saucony Excursion Waterproofing

Important Note :

Saucony Cohesion Waterproofing

Pros And Cons : Saucony Excursion VS Saucony Cohesion

Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Are the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Cohesion suitable for long-distance running?

Do these shoes provide arch support?

Are these shoes suitable for people with wide feet?