star trek infographic

• Planet Earth
• Strange News

The Evolution of ‘Star Trek’ (Infographic)

Table of Contents:

See the entire history of TV’s “Star Trek” in this infographic timeline of the iconic show’s first 45 years. “Star Trek” debuted on Sept. 8, 1966.

On Sept. 8, 1966, an American science fiction icon was born. The “Star Trek” television show lasted only three seasons, but spawned a lasting legacy that has stretched across decades and led to four spinoff live-action shows, a cartoon series and a dozen feature films. Gene Roddenberry and his team set their show aboard the U.S. S. Enterprise, a sophisticated starship with a competent crew of professional astronauts. A pilot episode starring Jeffrey Hunter was rejected by the NBC TV network as “too cerebral” for a general audience. The show was retooled with William Shatner in the starring role of Captain James T. Kirk. Leonard Nimoy was featured as the alien officer Spock. After its cancellation in 1969, the show grew even more popular, appearing several times per week (or even daily) in syndication. The Star Wars phenomenon of 1977 led Roddenberry to consider bringing the show back to television. Soon the plan changed, and “Star Trek the Motion Picture” appeared in 1979 to lukewarm reviews.

Video advice: The Evolution of Star Trek in Television & Film (50 Years of Trek)

Star Trek turns 50! AND Star Trek Beyond is here! So how about the ultimate Star Trek supercut with clips from every Star Trek movie and show? Sounds great to us.

Sci-Fi Development Graphics – ‘The Evolution of Star Trek’ Infographic – Avid Star Trek fans will be flocking to ‘The Evolution of Star Trek’ Infographic to confirm their carefully self-constructed timelines….

This graphic, which is set up like a timeline, examines film that sets the stage for the Star Trek franchise, iconic moments in the area of real space exploration and the first ever Star Trek convention. It also explores the specific episode occurrences of particular characters including the Romulans and Klingons.

Watch ‘Spocko’ Save Chris Pine’s ‘Star Trek’ Crew in SNL Spoof

The May 6 “Saturday Night Live” skit portrayed Captain James T. Kirk — played by Chris Pine, star of the last three “Star Trek” movies — sitting In the…

Inside a new spoof “lost” episode of “Star Wars: The Initial Series,” the USS Enterprise is saved not by Kirk, Scotty or Spock, but by Spock’s half brother, who comes from Queens, New York The May 6 “Saturday Night Live” skit portrayed Captain James T. Kirk — performed by Chris Pine, star from the last three “Star Wars” movies — relaxing in the captain’s chair, coping with the results of the Romulan attack that broken his ship. “I am unfamiliar with the mechanics of plasma systems,” states “SNL’s” Kyle Mooney, playing Spock, a Vulcan alien. “But I know somebody that is — my buddy. ” (The Evolution of ‘Star Trek’ (Infographic))”You’ve got a brother?” Kirk states, doing his best William Shatner (Kirk within the original series) impression. “One half brother,” Spock continues, stating that his relative is actually certainly one of Starfleet Academy’s best engineers. Then, “Spocko” (“SNL’s” Bobby Moynihan) seems around the bridge, flashing the Vulcan “live lengthy and prosper” signs with hands. “My name’s Spocko, reporting for duty right here,” the type states within an exaggerated New You are able to accent.

45 Years of Star Trek (Infographic)

Whenever you download any file to your hard drive via your browser, Windows automatically flags it as coming from the Internet and potentially dangerous. As a result when you open the respective file, depending on the type, Windows will warn you with a dialog box or prevent the file from executing.

More stories – This week the Star Trek franchise turns 45. Check out this infographic to see a sweeping retrospective that includes everything from the pilot episode to the introduction of the BORG to the current generation movie. Of all the interesting things on the infographic one of the most interesting is how close Star Trek came to being canceled. Early on the show didn’t have the widespread appeal and cult status it has now. The massive fan campaign that saved the show, 100,000 letters strong, was no small feat in a pre-internet age. Have a bit of Star Trek trivia or lore to share that wasn’t included in the infographic? Let’s hear about it in the comments. The Evolution of Star Trek (Space.

Video advice: Evolution of Star Trek Series Music Theme (1966- 2022)

The ultimate Star Trek Medley for all the Trekkies out there, with all the Star Trek TV Series music themes, in chronological order:

Here’s why we still love ‘Star Trek’ after all these years

An IMAX poster forParamountBy Miriam KramerSpace. comThe interstellar voyages of the Starship Enterprise have captured imaginations around the world for decades. Astronauts, movie makers, scientists, engineers and others from all walks of life cite “Star Trek’s” science and technology as an influence on their lives and world view. But why? What makes “Star Trek” the enduring and thrilling science fiction epic it is today? The optimistic crew ledby Captain Kirk in the original series and Jean-Luc Picard in “Star Trek: The Next Generation” gave a science-minded generation an outlet for expression, Dr. Mae Jemison, one of the astronauts inspired by the show, said. (See the Evolution of the Starship Enterprise in Photos)”I saw ‘Star Trek’ the original series as a little girl and for me it was really great because it talked about and it dealt with situations that were going on at the time, but you saw it with a lens of another place, another time, another world, another group of people,” Jemison, a former astronaut and the principal for the 100 Year Starship Foundation, told Space.

15 Things You Didn’t Know About Star Trek – Star Wars has influenced our lives in some manner because it first aired in 1966. Now it’s time to learn these 15 details concerning the legendary show?

Even if you didn’t grow up watching Star Trek after school, our culture has pulled so much inspiration from the original show that we can still see it every day. It’s not just die-hard Trekkies who are trying to bring the sci-fi tech into everyday use either. The modern cell phones that we use on a regular basis have been designed with the idea of Star Trek communicators in mind.

Images: A Collection Of Star Trek Infographics that Show The Evolution Of The Franchise, Uniform History, And How It Stacks Up To Star Wars – This is a collection of infographics that look at the legendary franchise that Star Trek has grown to become since its debut roughly fifty years ago. One provides a brief history of the franchise, another takes a look at the uniform changes that it has undergone, and one examines how it stacks up against Star Wars. These were created by Karl Tate at Space.com, Costume Supercenter, Hark.spoiler free movie review from the movie sleuth.

This is a collection of infographics that look at the legendary franchise that Star Trek has grown to become since its debut roughly fifty years ago. One provides a brief history of the franchise, another takes a look at the uniform changes that it has undergone, and one examines how it stacks up against Star Wars. These were created by Karl Tate at Space. com, Costume Supercenter, Hark. 

A Close-Up Look At ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Uniforms (INFOGRAPHIC)

We take a very deep dive into the new uniforms for Star Trek; Discovery, including a detailed infographic explaining all the details.

A much more obscure detail was spotted just for a couple of milliseconds inside a scene within the corridor from the U.S. S. Shenzhou. Once we follow one officer (within the above pointed out variant) lower the hall, a short flash of some other crew person wearing some type of white-colored jacket could be spotted. This white-colored jacket might be casual put on, however a good guess may be that it’s a medical smock.

• The Jackets
• Trousers and Boots

“Happy Transporter Accident”

For the past few weeks this has been me: “Zoom in…is that a seam, or is that just a digital artifact?” “See that person coming down the hall on the left…what are they holding?” “Ok back, and to the left…what’s on her boot?” I feel a bit like I have been on a CSI case, teasing out details from the smallest of clues, interviewing suspects who just aren’t talking. These new “Beastly Blues” are tricky! Hey, the original series movies had the “Monster Maroons” we need a catchy name too.

How Geeks Have Evolved Over Time (Infographic) – Where Star Wars and Star Trek geeks share common ground.

Hundreds of years ago, the term geek wasn’t as benign as it is today (high fives all around, gang). In 18th-century Austria-Hungary it was synonymous with freak–literally, used as the word for circus performers. Now, at worst, it’s used to describe someone who’s maybe a little too into comic books or tech.

Official Timeline of Star Trek

The team at StarTrek.com has released an official infographic video A Timeline Through the Star Trek Universe, Part 1 that includes all of the various TV and Movie series in their inter-connected places on the timeline. WATCH: A Timeline Through the Star Trek Universe, Part I The Star Trek.

They at StarTrek. com has released the official infographic video A Period With the Star Wars World, Part 1 which includes all the various TV and Movie series within their inter-connected places around the timeline. WATCH: A Period With the Star Wars World, Part IThe Star Wars saga has strongly traveled through space and time throughout its over fifty year history. Starfleet has visited a time long ago, the far future, as well as some alternate timelines. Take some context before you decide to dive deep into Star Wars: Discovery and get ready for Star Wars: Picard? We have got your back partly Our video timeline. Here’s an overview from the complete timeline:Interesting they refer to this as “Part 1”… Implying that there’s a lot more in the future. From the DataViz design perspective, I’m not keen on timelines that don’t have a consistent scale. There’s an enormous jump in the Big Bang 13. 8 Billion years back towards the year 1900, then your scale is fairly despite 50-year jumps before the year 2150, and so the scale changes again, making the 50-year jumps tend to be farther apart.

Related Articles:

• How ‘Star Trek’ Technology Works (Infographic)
• ‘Star Trek’ Starship Enterpise Evolution in Photos
• Inside Star Trek’s Galileo Shuttlecraft (Infographic)
• ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ season 3 will introduce Trek’s first transgender and nonbinary figures
• ‘Star Trek: Fleet Command’ mobile strategy game is beaming in the entire Trek timeline
• ‘Star Trek: Picard’ Actors Remember Their First Trek Encounters

You may also like

What ‘Star Trek’ Capt. Jean-Luc Picard Trained Me About Existence … And Love

Earth’s Shields Safeguard Existence in the Sun on ‘One Strange Rock’

New You are able to Comic Disadvantage 2022: Space Panels and Screenings to look at

Add comment, cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recent discoveries

Would You Like To Travel Into Space Ielts Speaking

How Much Space Is Required For A Workstation

______ Is Regarded As The Father Of Modern Geology

Will The Innovation For Homeland Security Work

• Animals 3041
• Astronomy 8
• Biology 2281
• Chemistry 482
• Culture 1333
• Entertainment 1139
• Health 8466
• History 2152
• Human Spaceflights 1209
• Physics 913
• Planet Earth 3239
• Science 2158
• Science & Astronomy 4927
• Search For Life 599
• Skywatching 1274
• Spaceflight 4586
• Strange News 1230
• Technology 3625
• Terms and Conditions 163

Random fact

You’re Fake News – People Misremember Statistical Details to suit Their Biases

Star Trek Timeline Infographic

In anticipation of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, we've compiled a complete timeline of Star Trek from 1969 to present.

Edited By Aaron Gates

Share | Apr 25, 2022

The 12th Star Trek series, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds , debuts Thursday, May 5 on Paramount+ . To mark the occasion—and show just how far the franchise has come in its 50+ year history—we’ve compiled a complete timeline of Star Trek from 1969 to present, including series, movies, trivia, villains, and more.

Star Trek  timeline

Don't miss an update

Stay updated on the latest products and services anytime anywhere.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy & Terms and Conditions .

Filter By :

Infographic

Interactive

Presentation

Fearsome & Fantastical Fictional Fleets

Wikia: The Year in Fandom

Star Trek Uniform Guide

Starfleet Insignia: Evolution of the Star Trek Delta Shield

15 Things You Didn't Know About Star Trek

Big Data - The Next Frontier of IT

An Astonishing Agglomeration of Robots and Artificial Intelligence

Star Trek Random Facts

The Eternal Debate: Star Wars vs. Star Trek

Starship Size Comparison Chart

So You Think You're A Robot?

Star Trek Interactive Infographic

Star Trek Timeline

The Evolution of Star Trek

Millenium Falcom vs. USS Enterprise

We don't have any Visuals to show you in this category.

Star Trek Timeline

by David Wallace | Mar 23, 2017 | Entertainment Industry Infographics

Here is a handy infographic which provides the dates of when all of the different Star Trek TV shows and films were set. Discover when the Star Trek original series was set, Star Trek Next Generation was set, Star Trek The Motion Picture was set and all of the rest by reading this piece.

[Click image for full size version]

David Wallace is a search & social media marketer who lives in Ahwatukee Arizona with his lovely wife. Interests & hobbies include all things Disney, roller coasters, musicianship and Christianity.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Instagram

Related Content

Search 11,800+ infographics, browse archives by category.

• Animated Infographics
• Business Infographics
• Career & Jobs Infographics
• Education Infographics
• Entertainment Industry Infographics
• Environmental Infographics
• Finance & Money Infographics
• Food & Drink Infographics
• Health Infographics
• Historical Infographics
• Home & Garden Infographics
• Interactive Infographics
• Internet Infographics
• Law and Legal Infographics
• Lifestyle Infographics
• Marketing Infographics
• Offbeat Infographics
• Parenting Infographics
• Pets & Animals Infographics
• Political Infographics
• Shopping Infographics
• Sports and Athletic Infographics
• Technology Infographics
• Transportation Infographics
• Travel Infographics
• Video Infographics

Inside Star Trek's Galileo Shuttlecraft (Infographic)

Deep-space exploration vehicles such as the starship U.S.S. Enterprise in the iconic science fiction series "Star Trek" carry several auxiliary craft for short trips to other spacecraft or to make planet landings. "Galileo" is perhaps the most famous such vehicle.

The Galileo shuttlecraft is a Class F shuttlecraft carries up to seven passengers and has space-warp engines for interstellar travel. A Constitution-class starship like the U.S.S. Enterprise typically carries four shuttlecraft.

For " Star Trek ," the sets that would represent Galileo were constructed by the Aluminum Model Toys company (AMT). The sets were built for free in exchange for the rights to manufacture plastic model kits of the show's various spaceships. Early designs by "Star Trek" designer Walter "Matt" Jefferies proved too complex to build in time, so AMT redesigned a boxier shape. [ See Photos of the Galileo Restoration ]

Car customizer Gene Winfield led the team that built the Galileo exterior mockup. The 23-foot (7 meters) mockup has a 5.5-foot (1.7 meters) ceiling height and is empty inside with no interior details. The mockup's framework was welded from 2-inch square steel tubing. Carpenters covered the frame with wood and sheet metal.

Original Star Trek Galileo Spacecraft - Where Is It Today? | Video

The mockup's three-panel hatch was operated by stagehands pulling cables. The cylindrical warp engine pods were made from oil well tubes. Aircraft surplus landing gear was added at the rear of the shuttle.

A separately-constructed interior set was more spacious than the exterior mockup and had a higher ceiling so that actors could stand upright without crouching. The interior set includes an "aft compartment" with its own exit to the outside, even though no such compartment could have fit into the exterior mockup.

In special effects sequences Galileo was represented by a small model. A miniature Enterprise hangar bay was also constructed.

After multiple failed restoration attempts and decades of exposure to the elements, Galileo was in bad shape . Wood had rotted, metal had rusted and only bits remained of the original exterior finish. In 2012, the carcass of Galileo was purchased at auction by super-fan Adam Schneider, working with “Star Trek” blogger Alec Peters.

Boat builders Hans Mikaitis and Ken Foster led the team of restorers. They stripped Galileo down to its steel framework, fabricating all-new wood panels and constructing a new mechanism for opening and closing the three-panel entry door.

Details such as the impulse engine and access hatch on the ship's rear had to be built from scratch. The warp engine pods and landing gear are still original parts from 1967. Fans of the show contributed to the project as well, offering information, rare photos and even the replica “busy box” installed on the Galileo’s stern.

The Galileo first appeared in a "Star Trek" episode aired in January 1967. The first official NASA mention of a "space shuttle" dates to 1968, during the original network TV run of "Star Trek." Prior to that, the concept had been called "orbital ferry" or "integral launch and re-entry vehicle."

The first real-life NASA shuttlecraft to be built was to be named Constitution in honor of the 200th anniversary of the United States Constitution. The ship was renamed Enterprise in part thanks to 100,000 letters written by “Star Trek” fans. Enterprise was rolled out in a ceremony on September 17, 1976, that included most of the cast members of the original show. 

• The Evolution of 'Star Trek' (Infographic)
• 'Star Trek - Into Darkness': A Photo Gallery
• The Top 10 Star Trek Technologies

Follow us on Twitter , Facebook and Google+ .

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: [email protected].

Get the Space.com Newsletter

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

Karl's association with Space.com goes back to 2000, when he was hired to produce interactive Flash graphics. From 2010 to 2016, Karl worked as an infographics specialist across all editorial properties of Purch (formerly known as TechMediaNetwork).  Before joining Space.com, Karl spent 11 years at the New York headquarters of The Associated Press, creating news graphics for use around the world in newspapers and on the web.  He has a degree in graphic design from Louisiana State University and now works as a freelance graphic designer in New York City.

Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin could soon launch Nigeria's 1st-ever space tourist

International Space Station: Live updates

Massive radio telescope array investigates the birth of planets around twin stars

• 2 Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin could soon launch Nigeria's 1st-ever space tourist
• 3 Supermassive black hole winds blowing at 36 million miles per hour can sculpt entire galaxies
• 4 Florida family files claim with NASA after ISS space junk crashes into home
• 5 Air sealed in Perseverance's Mars sample return tubes is as precious as the rocks themselves

The Science of Star Trek (Infographic)

re: the first season uniforms, I think it’s a hark back to the early complaints that the OS uniforms didn’t look “futuristic” enough. As the OS costume designer once said: “We talked to NASA about what people would wear in the future and it always sounded like long underwear”.

It’s probably also why they tried the shorts on men in the first season, to respond to complaints that the miniskirts in the OS were sexist in that there was no male equivalent.

Ah, yes, the so-called “space cheerleader” uniform (as described by Marina Sirtis). Personally, I thought they were kinda hokey (translation – looked stupid on men), and quite unnecessary.

• June 26, 2024 | Rosario Dawson Had To Turn Down Playing A Changeling In ‘Star Trek’ Because Of ‘Ahsoka’ Role
• June 26, 2024 | Check Out 14 Preview Images From ‘Star Trek: Prodigy’ Season 2
• June 26, 2024 | See Worf’s Crew Fight Giant Interdimensional Space Bugs In Preview Of ‘Star Trek: Defiant’ #16
• June 21, 2024 | Podcast: ‘Star Trek: Prodigy’ Co-EP Aaron Waltke Joins All Access To Talk Season 2
• June 20, 2024 | Watch: First ‘Star Trek: Prodigy’ Season 2 Trailer Reveals New Classified Mission And A Time Paradox

INFOGRAPHIC: Where Does Star Trek Online Fit Into Canon?

| September 22, 2016 | By: Kayla Iacovino 53 comments so far

Cryptic, makers of the hit game Star Trek Online , have just released this handy infographic explaining where the video game’s story fits into Star Trek canon, which can get confusing what with six series, thirteen movies, and multiple timelines.

Download the full resolution version here

Related Articles

DS9 , Star Trek Online , VOY

Nicole de Boer Returning As Captain Ezri Dax For ‘Star Trek Online: Both Worlds’

Star Trek Online , Star Trek: Resurgence , TNG

‘Star Trek: Resurgence’ Disc Release Gets Star Trek Online And Comic Book Pre-Order Bonus

Star Trek Online

‘Star Trek Online: Unraveled’ Launches Next Week With New Multiverse Story

Star Trek Online , TNG

Gates McFadden Joins ‘Star Trek: Online’ As Mirror Beverly Crusher For “Refractions”

I love these infographics! Keep them coming!

It would be nice if those who created these infographics spent time on proofreading. Why do the dates have apostrophes in them? Not very professional.

Why so critical?

Because I take pride in my own work. It would be nice to see others do the same.

So basically you think you should criticize another persons effort?

Mike Krukow,

Re: So basically you [Dandru] think you should criticize another persons effort?

It seems obvious that Dandru takes pride in his own works of criticizing others. So, yes?

I didn’t realize he designed it , if that is the case , I sincerely apologize

And if no one pointed out the errors, how would the author ever be able to grow and improve his efforts?

Trump\’s Tribble,

Re:if no one pointed out the errors

Pointing out errors is one thing, but throwing in condescension and derision has absolutely NOTHING to do with promoting the growth and improvement of others, but rather, everything to do with self-stroking the insecure ego of someone who isn’t content with merely having achieved one’s own goals. Such individuals are driven to let everyone else, who likely therefore do not share the exact same priorities and values, know what lesser undeserving beings they are, i.e. not looking to encourage anything but one’s own sense of superiority over the unwashed rabble.

Technically this is not an error. It is very common to see something that has no specific year, just a loose group of time, such as a decade, referred to as “The 1980’s”. This infographic simply follows the same convention for a century (rather than a decade). So for example it says somewhere in the 2600’s the temporal war occurred. This is considered an acceptable style in various publications. While the use of an apostrophe has started to fall into disuse, you can easily still find it in use today. There is also a bit of a cultural difference, in the USA, the apostrophe with a date was commonly used, while in the Britain it was apparently never considered proper styling. http://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/9199/do-decades-ever-get-apostrophes http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/13631/is-an-apostrophe-with-a-decade-e-g-1920-s-generally-considered-incorrect

Matt, According to AP, APA, MLA, and Chicago Manual of Style (in other words, the majority of American publishing and academia), the apostrophe is incorrect.

And it hasn’t “started to fall into disuse.” The incorrect way (using an apostrophe) gained ground in the 90s and early 2000s thanks to the Internet, desktop publishing, and the rise of other non-edited (or poorly edited) work by anyone with a computer. While there had been some confusion before, now the apostrophe became common, just like many myths or errors that spread virally.

This infographic uses apostrophes incorrectly, just like people who use “figuratively” when they mean “literally.” It’s common, and it gets overlooked or accepted, but it’s still incorrect. (Sadly, some dictionaries have added figuratively as an alternate meaning for literally, which literally is one of the dumbest things ever done regarding language.)

BTW, StackExchange is a rotten resource. It’s like using Yahoo Answers or asking random strangers on a bus.

Yes I know StackExchange is like using Wikipedia as a source (or worse), but it had some handy links to more legitimate sources if you’d care to follow the links through instead of just shouting “terrible resource” as if I didn’t know it wasn’t to be trusted, they include links and/or excerpts of various books where some say you can use it, and others do not. A source that says an apostrophe may be used includes the New York Times, so to say it is outright incorrect, is just not true, a major publication allows it in their style guide.

So while I agree, since the major style guides say not to use an apostrophe, it shouldn’t be used. However there are also conflicting style guides. So maybe folks can take it down a notch on the grammar teacher shtick?

Either way, that apostrophe was clearly done intentionally (if perhaps incorrectly). So Dandru’s original snarky comment is clearly wrong, someone did proofread it, the apostrophe is used in multiple places. They may have gotten the style incorrect, but wasn’t because Cryptic is too stupid to check their graphic.

Matt, my comment didn’t deserve ANY of the sneering tone and vitriol with which you replied. NOTHING in my comment to you justifies the snide tone of your reply. An apology would be appreciated.

(And I *did* click through the links before declaring StackExchange a terrible source. That’s a big part of *how* I know it’s a terrible resource. So there’s no need for your sneering and condescension on THAT matter, either.)

Yeah, you’re right, probably got too carried away there. Many people do what I’d call “drive by” comments and really don’t take the time to check things out. This is especially prevalent when a person thinks they’ve “gotten one up” on a site, and they think they’ve caught an error. They comment without real thought and then move on.

The New York Times eliminated this use of apostrophes from their date style in 2006/2007. Have they since reinstated apostrophes in this usage? Which edition of their style manual?

It sounds like they eliminated the apostrophe more recently than what I had access to (2002 edition).

Matt Wright,

Re:It sounds like they eliminated the apostrophe more recently

If it is indeed as PaulB suggests, it would seem prideful grammarists:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/travel/melania-trump-ljubljana-slovenia-then-and-now.html

“At Tozd, a cafe with a bicycle on the wall, Tito-era ashtrays on the tables and tapas named after 1980’s [ sic ] pop stars …” — ‘Melania Trump’s Ljubljana, Then and Now’; By JASON HOROWITZ; NEXT STOP Column; THE NEW YORK TIMES, AUG. 4, 2016

have bigger fish to fry than po’ lil’ ol’ Cryptic or you.

Re: It sounds like they eliminated the apostrophe more recently

If I am reading this correctly:

afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com/faqs-on-style/

Nov. 14, 2011

Matt Wright: The apostrophe is incorrect. There’s nothing “technically” about that. It is not considered an acceptable style. Anyone doing so is in error. It hasn’t started to fall into disuse since it was never the correct style to begin with.

Re:There’s nothing “technically” about that.

As a speaker of the language, I believe that you are entitled to an opinion on the matter. But you have never offered anything in your many peeves here that has revealed yourself to be an undeniable final authority in the matters which are of personal concern to you.

Contrary to your assertion, Matt is correct that THE NEW YORK TIMES supported the apostrophe numerical pluralization construct in the 2002 edition of his NYT STYLE GUIDE. The source for that was none other than their own William Safire, who I and numerous others do recognize as an authority on the matter:

http://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/21/archives/on-language-goodbye-girl-the-weighty-80s.html?_r=0

“The big question that faces all of us in these end‐of‐the‐decade thumbsuckers is: does the plural of a number take an apostrophe?

The answer is yes. (If you prefer: The answer is “yes.”) We are not leaving the 1970s, we are leaving the 1970’s — or if you like to abbreviate, as in the “spirit of ‘76,” we are leaving the 70’s. Not the ‘70s. (The apostrophe goes only before a single year, not a decade.)” – ‘On Language Goodbye Girl’; By WILLIAM SAFIRE; NYT; OCT. 21, 1979;

Disinvited, Yes, the NYT supported the apostrophe in the *2002* edition–14 years ago. In 2006/2007, they dropped the apostrophe from decades. That’s just a little bit more recent than (*checks your comment*) 1979. Yes, Safire was an authority and his comment was valid–37 years ago.

This use of apostrophes is incorrect. Current versions of every major style manual say the apostrophe is wrong in this usage. The New York Times has said so since 2006/2007.

So, no, the answer is NOT yes. You are simply wrong on this. The apostrophe is incorrect according to the vast majority of modern American publishing (including the NYT!), so using an outdated-and-replaced 2002 NYT style guide as your source is simply ludicrous (in an already ludicrous thread).

Sure, Dandru is being pedantic and trying to push an argument with Matt, it appears, so Dandru deserves a smackdown, but at least try to be current and accurate in your smackdown.

Re: 14 years ago

That wasn’t the issue for Dandru. He insisted that It NEVER was any other way than the way you and he assert it is now.

And again, as I said to him, I say to you: I haven’t seen anything in your posts to give an indication why I should recognize you as a sole authority on the matter.

Here’s what the University of Chicago Press via their online version of their THE CHICAGO MANUAL OF STYLE says on the matter:

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Plurals/faq0007.html

“Chicago style omits the apostrophe, but the thing about style is, there is no single great arbiter who makes rules that everyone follows. Different houses use different styles. Following a particular style allows a person to be consistent within a given document, but it really doesn’t matter which style you choose.” — THE CHICAGO MANUAL OF STYLE ONLINE, chicagomanualofstyle.org

Bona fides:

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/about16_history.html

Disinvited, You haven’t offered any authority either, so get off your high horse. Of all of us in this chat, I have provided more complete and accurate information than any of all–heck, than all of you combined–so you really need to chill out.

If you’d like, I can provide the links to information for AP, APA, and MLA to go along with Chicago saying to eliminate the apostrophe.

And yes, duh, of course there is no ABSOLUTE ARBITER of the English language. As I’ve been clear to say repeatedly, I’m using the vast majority of current style guides as my guidance. I could mention my 30+ years of professional editing and writing, as well as my three degrees in writing and teaching, as well as my ongoing profession as a college writing teacher. But I don’t need to because you haven’t provided anything to contradict my claims here, so…sorry, you’re just barking up the wrong tree, buddy.

You should get off your high horse and stop trying to condescend to all of us. If you feel a need to continue doing so, leave me out of it.

Re: You haven’t offered any authority either

I have never contended I personally was or that my opinion should be the only thought on the matter, but I have provided links to reputable sources with ideas that counter what’s been bandied about while others merely assert and provide nothing that can be as readily checked.

According to sources I’ve cited, these two observations have no merit:

(Dates with apostrophes in them) “Not very professional.” — NYT which you have mentioned several times as a “professional” resource in the matter still publishes what you call the incorrect plural date constructs in this year’s articles as recent as last month [See my previous cite.] I’m just saying how serious are we supposed to take his “Not very professional.” observation if the reigning professional authority on the matter is still getting it wrong and still hasn’t corrected it in over a month in print and online ten years after you say it was adopted?

“It hasn’t started to fall into disuse since it was never the correct style to begin with.”

You couldn’t be more wrong about what I am wrestling with here or how high a horse I am riding. I couldn’t have made it more clearer when I said, “As a speaker of the language, I believe that you are entitled to an opinion on the matter.”

And I definitely don’t know how my taking issues with ad hominems got turned around to me supposedly taking issue with the change as a valid style shift?

It’s amazing how one man’s small, idiotic criticisms of some thing so completely unimportant turns into such a large thread. I gotta stop reading the comments section.

Dozens of posts talking about an apostrophe. This is why Trekkies are seen as petty nit picking nerds.

Silvereyes,

It has nothing to do with Trekkies. If you do the following pet peeve search in Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22grammar+pet+peeves%22+%22apostrophes%22%22pluralization%22+&btnG=Search&tbs=qdr%3Aa

You will get around 22 results when duplicates are removed.

If you subtract out all results which mention the word “TREK”:

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22grammar+pet+peeves%22+%22apostrophes%22%22pluralization%22+-TREK&btnG=Search&tbs=qdr%3Aa

You get 20.

Clearly those petty nit picking nerds, which concern you so, transcend Trekkies at least eleven to one, and only someone with a chip on their shoulder could twist that spilling over to here as some sort of solely Trek fan marginalizing stereotypical activity.

Disinvited, your logic is flawed. I’m not saying all nit picking nerds are Trekkies, I’m saying many (too many) Trekkies are nit picking nerds.

Your post tends to support my observation.

And yes I have a chip on my shoulder. I tire of reading people who have nothing better to do than complain about apostrophes!

Re:your logic is flawed

No, the issue I was directly addressing was your intimation which you conveniently restated in your reply as “I’m saying many (too many) Trekkies are nit picking nerds.” How can Trekkie nitpicking nerds be “too many” as exemplified by those complaining about apostrophes as you contended, when nitpicking nerds that complain about apostrophes outnumber them at least eleven to one?

I suppose I could follow your lead and take a stab at restating my response too: I don’t see how a proven extreme minority can logically be “too many” and singled out from a far bigger majority’s identical concerns without recourse to an irrational, and therefore illogical, bigotry, i.e. an admitted chip, against their values and priorities not aligning with your own?

Obviously, I do share your concerns about Trek nitpickers being unduly petty. Especially, when they mix valid concerns with ad hominem embellishments, such as in reporting an inaccuracy, which are not just merely offensively petty but themselves demonstrably fraught with inaccuracy to boot.

Re: I tire of reading people who have nothing better to do than complain about apostrophes!

This can be addressed. See my response too sean_skroht in the next message immediately following this one as I post it, but which can be directly accessed by this link here:

https://trekmovie.com/2016/09/22/infographic-where-does-star-trek-online-fit-into-canon/#comment-5326440

if that position changes in the future.

sean_skroht,

Re: I gotta stop reading the comments section

You don’t even have to do that with the new comments options. If you look at Dandru’s seed comment here:

https://trekmovie.com/2016/09/22/infographic-where-does-star-trek-online-fit-into-canon/#comment-5326320

You will note in its bottom right hand corner the words “Hide Replies ∧”. If you click on that, all replies to that post of his will be hidden from you and you can easily progress to the next post without ever spying a one of them.

Saw this the other day and wondered if it was suggesting that the timeline split happened from the Earth Romulan War rather than Nero’s arrival? Wasn’t sure if it was just the way the graphic was layed out or if it was suggesting something different…would of thought that would be where the two would divide.

Yeah, that part is really confusing and does not make much sense

Yeah I see what you’re saying, but Nero’s arrival didn’t happen in the Prime timeline, so it would also be confusing to propagate the split from there (implying it happened in both timelines and then they diverged).

I consider it Cannon My Self its a great game and great company behind it that takes there players seriously I love Cryptic

You consider it a large-barreled weapon that propels lead balls?

“Call not me slanderer; thou, and thine, usurp The dominations, royalties, and rights, Of this oppressed boy: This is thy eldest son’s son, Infortunate [ sic ] in nothing but in thee; Thy sins are visited in this poor child; The cannon [ sic ] of the law is laid on him, Being but the second generation Removed from thy sin-conceiving womb.” — KING JOHN, by William Shakespeare, PLAYS OF WILLIAM SHAKSPEARE [ sic ] , p 210 – 211

https://books.google.com/books?id=OEsbAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

Aha I see what you did there!

You used sarcasm to describe Cryptic in the exact opposite of how they really are ;)

The thing to keep in mind with STO is that it just a video game. Meaning: everything that is actually canon, realistic and plausible in the Star Trek universe, is all thrown out the airlock.

Here, Starfleet officers in the 25th century fly in ships from the past, ships from far in the future, ships from the JJ-verse, ships from all kinds of alien races and fire every kind of weapon except phasers.

In the article title, the word “canon” is used to describe how the game’s story ties in to actual Star Trek on-screen canon. While the devs are real Trek fans and the content they put out is very trek-knowledgeable and can very entertaining, the game itself is in no way, shape or form, canon.

It is however fully vetted by the franchise owners, licensed, and approved at every step by those owners.

Wrong name of Dyson sphere

They have 2 Dyson Spheres in the game, the Jenolan Sphere where Scotty crashed in the USS Jenolan & the Solanae Sphere, near New Romulus.

While I totally understand setting the TNG spinoff (DS9) on a space station near a wormhole, it would have been fascinating to have had a series set entirely within the Jenolan Dyson Sphere. With that amount of ‘class M’ landmass, there’d be decades worth of stories to tell. The whole concept of a Dyson sphere is mind blowing!

Beautiful graphic — so informative!

I don’t play the silly game so for me it doesn’t fit in any where.

Why are you even on this thread in the first place if you consider it “silly?” Get a grip.

Anyone has noticed a two more timelines?

My guess is that one of those phantom timelines is the one featured in “Yesterday’s Enterprise” (TNG), and the other is the pre-Temporal Cold War/TMP timeline. I say this because, in TMP, when Decker was showing Robo-Ilia around the Recreation Area, there isn’t an NX-01 “Enterprise” among the other ships named “Enterprise”. I always felt that ENT was the result of a temporal incursion, but, unfortunately, that plot point was never fleshed out.

I have played this game and spent money on it. Love the ship to ship combat. Great game. Unfortunately, I can’t get it to work anymore. Bummer.

If you own an Xbox one or PS4 they recently launched STO there, doesn’t have everything from the PC version yet but if your PC can’t handle the game anymore it might allow you to get back into playing it by going that route.

http://www.startrek.com/article/50-years-later-where-no-man-has-gone-before

Rodden and McCartney https://www.facebook.com/roddenberry/photos/a.379278853143.160328.39143388143/10153871172413144/?type=3&theater

Well, so long as we’re playing the backseat-copyeditor game (for the record, I *am* a professional copyeditor in a large corporation, and assuming Cryptic even *has* a stylebook for STO, I appreciate the difficulty of getting all staff to adhere to its strictures)…

1. For the solanogen-based aliens from subspace who abducted Riker et al, who reappeared in the “Star Trek: Titan” novel _Sight Unseen_ (2015), and who get a Dyson sphere in STO … the novel and game use spelling “Solanae” (see: http://sto.gamepedia.com/Solanae ) but the infographic is mis-spelled twice as “Solane.”

2 and 3. Left side: Most, but not all, of the TV episodes are labeled with season and episode. Both exceptions appear under “Klingon War.” There’s an (unavoidable?) inconsistency that the movies are numbered only through “VI,” whereas the four TNG films aren’t sequenced.

4. Right side: Most, but not all, of the events use sentence-casing, e.g., “2258 Vulcan is destroyed … 2393 Bajor gains full Federation membership” vs. “2293 First Khitomer Accords Signed … 2344 Tasha Yar Captured by Romulans.”

In all my years of enjoying trekmovie.com, yours was the most professional contribution that I have ever seen made in a comment chain addressing such issues. While I haven’t concerned myself directly with raising my own concerns on some other posted article that may appear, to me, to require, if not an emending, at least another once over, you certainly put the pale to my own past feeble attempts to so do.

Re: assuming Cryptic even *has* a stylebook for STO

Drawing on my personal experience in coding and working with teams to that end, I can’t imagine Cryptic putting something together like STO without recourse to some sort of guide from at least the code writing side of it. I suspect their infographic might have its root origins leaning more to service that end, over, say, merely “Wouldn’t this be a cool thing to do?”

GraphicsPedia

Star trek: 15 fascinating facts you haven’t heard before – infographic.

Star Trek first hit the airwaves in 1966 and even now, 56 years later, it holds sway on the imagination of people of all ages and made a lasting impression on pop culture. Whether it’ phrases: It’s time we learned that freedom is never a gift, it has to be earned , or it’s unprecedented futuristic thinking: think Teleportation, Artificial Intelligence!

While there’s a whole, fat dictionary of interesting facts spread over the internet – what this infographic does is bring you 15 mindboggling lesser-known facts – like the fact that the Vulcan salute is best achieved with glue!

15 Things You Didn’t Know About Star Trek:

Infographic by – rickylinndesign

• More to Explore
• Series & Movies

Published Jun 20, 2024

The Official Trailer and Key Art for Season 2 of Animated Series Star Trek: Prodigy Is Here

Season 2 will premiere with all 20 episodes on July 1 exclusively on Netflix in the U.S. and select countries around the world.

StarTrek.com

CBS Studios debuted the official trailer and key art for the second season of the original animated kids' series, Star Trek: Prodigy . The hit series will premiere all 20 episodes on Monday, July 1 on Netflix in select countries around the world. Season 1 episodes of the series are currently available on Netflix.

In Season 2, these six young outcasts who make up the Prodigy crew are assigned a new mission aboard the U.S.S. Voyager -A to rescue Captain Chakotay and bring peace to Gwyn's home world. However, when their plan goes astray, it creates a time paradox that jeopardizes both their future and past.

The Star Trek: Prodigy voice cast includes Kate Mulgrew (Kathryn Janeway), Brett Gray (Dal), Ella Purnell (Gwyn), Rylee Alazraqui (Rok-Tahk), Angus Imrie (Zero), Jason Mantzoukas (Jankom Pog), Dee Bradley Baker (Murf), John Noble (The Diviner), and Jimmi Simpson (Drednok).

Season 2 recurring voice cast members include Robert Beltran (Captain Chakotay), Robert Picardo (The Doctor), Jason Alexander (Dr. Noum), Daveed Diggs (Commander Tysess), Jameela Jamil (Ensign Asencia), Ronny Cox (Admiral Jellico), and Michaela Dietz (Maj’el).

Developed by Emmy Award winners Kevin and Dan Hageman ( Trollhunters and Ninjago ), along with Alex Kurtzman and his team at Secret Hideout, the CG-animated series Star Trek: Prodigy is the first Star Trek series aimed at younger audiences and follows a motley crew of young aliens who must figure out how to work together while navigating a greater galaxy, in search of a better future.

"We deeply appreciate our fans who have stood by us and our passionate crew who made this all possible. The work speaks for itself, but it's the heart that will endure," said co-showrunners Kevin and Dan Hageman about the Season 2 release.

Star Trek: Prodigy received a 2023 TCA Award nomination for "Outstanding Achievement in Family Programming" along with a 2022 Children's and Family Emmy Award nomination for Outstanding Animated Series, and production designer, Alessandro Taini, won the award for Outstanding Individual Achievement in Animation.

Star Trek: Prodigy is from CBS' Eye Animation Productions, CBS Studios' animation arm; Nickelodeon Animation; Secret Hideout; and Roddenberry Entertainment. Alex Kurtzman, Heather Kadin, Aaron Baiers, Rod Roddenberry and Trevor Roth serve as executive producers, alongside co-showrunners Kevin and Dan Hageman. Ben Hibon directs, executive produces and serves as the creative lead of the animated series. Aaron Waltke and Patrick Krebs also currently serve as co-executive producers. Star Trek: Prodigy is distributed by Paramount Global Content Distribution.

Get Updates By Email

Star Trek: Prodigy will stream on Netflix globally (excluding Canada, Nordics, CEE, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Poland, Russia, Belarus and Mainland China) and Season 1 is currently available on SkyShowtime in the Nordics, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and Central and Eastern Europe with Season 2 coming soon. Season two has launched in France on France Televisions channels and Okoo.

Follow Cool Infographics

Need infographics.

Designer | Author | Instructor | Speaker

FREE Sample Chapter

Apr 18 Star Wars vs. Star Trek

Which one wins, Star Wars or Star Trek? This is one of the most heavily debated question of all time. The Star Wars vs Star Trek  infographic from hark.com  and TrekNews.net will not give you the answer on who is better… However, it will give you some concrete numbers on things like awards, social media followers, number of video games, and movies.

The war wages on. The battle between two of sci-fi’s most iconic franchises, Star Trek and Star Wars, is a battle that has been discussed by fans for over 30 years. The recent news of  J.J. Abrams accepting the director’s job on the next Star Wars film , only fanned the flames. Today’s infographic pits the two franchises against each other once again — with criteria including number of films, box office gross, number of Academy, Grammy and Emmy Awards, video games, books, toys, and social media followers.

This is a fun topic, perfect to incite discussion and links from the online community.  My only criticism of the design is the many of the statistics are not visualized.  Big fonts are not visualizations, so the infographic would be easier to comprehend if numbers like the Total Box Office Gross proceeds were visualized.

Found on infographicjournal.com

Apr 22 8 New Punctuation Marks We Need

Apr 16 The Anatomy of the Social Media Command Center

Related posts.

Oct 22 Star Wars Size Comparison Video

Sep 26 App Store Wars infographic

Oct 1 Star Wars Commander